Gravitymaster 0 #76 July 18, 2012 QuoteQuote http://factcheck.org/2012/07/factcheck-to-obama-camp-your-complaint-is-all-wet/ Of course, that was written BEFORE Bain's SEC filings came to light stating that in 2000, 2001 and 2002 Mitt was CEO, President, Chairman and sole shareholder. Hard to believe that a CEO, president and chairman of a company has no involvement whatsoever in running the company. Unless you live in the GOP alternate universe. So what. The only thing voters are going to care about in November is which candidate is going to make their lfe better. I don't remember lefties being so concerned about lies when Clinton was President. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 1,662 #77 July 18, 2012 Quote Quote Quote http://factcheck.org/2012/07/factcheck-to-obama-camp-your-complaint-is-all-wet/ Of course, that was written BEFORE Bain's SEC filings came to light stating that in 2000, 2001 and 2002 Mitt was CEO, President, Chairman and sole shareholder. Hard to believe that a CEO, president and chairman of a company has no involvement whatsoever in running the company. Unless you live in the GOP alternate universe. So what. Admission of defeat there, I'd say.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #78 July 18, 2012 Quote Quote Quote Quote http://factcheck.org/2012/07/factcheck-to-obama-camp-your-complaint-is-all-wet/ Of course, that was written BEFORE Bain's SEC filings came to light stating that in 2000, 2001 and 2002 Mitt was CEO, President, Chairman and sole shareholder. Hard to believe that a CEO, president and chairman of a company has no involvement whatsoever in running the company. Unless you live in the GOP alternate universe. So what. Admission of defeat there, I'd say. Nope, everything is still here. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 1,662 #79 July 18, 2012 Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote http://factcheck.org/2012/07/factcheck-to-obama-camp-your-complaint-is-all-wet/ Of course, that was written BEFORE Bain's SEC filings came to light stating that in 2000, 2001 and 2002 Mitt was CEO, President, Chairman and sole shareholder. Hard to believe that a CEO, president and chairman of a company has no involvement whatsoever in running the company. Unless you live in the GOP alternate universe. So what. Admission of defeat there, I'd say. Nope, everything is still here. Alternate realities are like that, I'm told.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #80 July 18, 2012 Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote http://factcheck.org/2012/07/factcheck-to-obama-camp-your-complaint-is-all-wet/ Of course, that was written BEFORE Bain's SEC filings came to light stating that in 2000, 2001 and 2002 Mitt was CEO, President, Chairman and sole shareholder. Hard to believe that a CEO, president and chairman of a company has no involvement whatsoever in running the company. Unless you live in the GOP alternate universe. So what. Admission of defeat there, I'd say. Nope, everything is still here. Alternate realities are like that, I'm told. I'm sure you have a lot of first hand experience. I'll have to take your word on that. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 1,662 #81 July 18, 2012 Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote http://factcheck.org/2012/07/factcheck-to-obama-camp-your-complaint-is-all-wet/ Of course, that was written BEFORE Bain's SEC filings came to light stating that in 2000, 2001 and 2002 Mitt was CEO, President, Chairman and sole shareholder. Hard to believe that a CEO, president and chairman of a company has no involvement whatsoever in running the company. Unless you live in the GOP alternate universe. So what. Admission of defeat there, I'd say. Nope, everything is still here. Alternate realities are like that, I'm told. I'm sure you have a lot of first hand experience. I'll have to take your word on that. And a reading problem too!... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #82 July 18, 2012 Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote http://factcheck.org/2012/07/factcheck-to-obama-camp-your-complaint-is-all-wet/ Of course, that was written BEFORE Bain's SEC filings came to light stating that in 2000, 2001 and 2002 Mitt was CEO, President, Chairman and sole shareholder. Hard to believe that a CEO, president and chairman of a company has no involvement whatsoever in running the company. Unless you live in the GOP alternate universe. So what. Admission of defeat there, I'd say. Nope, everything is still here. Alternate realities are like that, I'm told. I'm sure you have a lot of first hand experience. I'll have to take your word on that. And a reading problem too! So once again you are basing an opinion on 3rd party information that you have no idea is reliable. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,456 #83 July 18, 2012 >The only thing voters are going to care about in November is which candidate is >going to make their lfe better. True. And if the economy continues to recover all Obama has to say is "I will continue doing that." Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 1,662 #84 July 18, 2012 Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote http://factcheck.org/2012/07/factcheck-to-obama-camp-your-complaint-is-all-wet/ Of course, that was written BEFORE Bain's SEC filings came to light stating that in 2000, 2001 and 2002 Mitt was CEO, President, Chairman and sole shareholder. Hard to believe that a CEO, president and chairman of a company has no involvement whatsoever in running the company. Unless you live in the GOP alternate universe. So what. Admission of defeat there, I'd say. Nope, everything is still here. Alternate realities are like that, I'm told. I'm sure you have a lot of first hand experience. I'll have to take your word on that. And a reading problem too! So once again you are basing an opinion on 3rd party information that you have no idea is reliable. Well, I also read what you and rushmc write, which provides pretty good confirmation. Do YOU believe that a CEO, president and chairman of a company has no involvement whatsoever in running the company, all the while drawing a salary from it?... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #85 July 18, 2012 Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote http://factcheck.org/2012/07/factcheck-to-obama-camp-your-complaint-is-all-wet/ Of course, that was written BEFORE Bain's SEC filings came to light stating that in 2000, 2001 and 2002 Mitt was CEO, President, Chairman and sole shareholder. Hard to believe that a CEO, president and chairman of a company has no involvement whatsoever in running the company. Unless you live in the GOP alternate universe. So what. Admission of defeat there, I'd say. Nope, everything is still here. Alternate realities are like that, I'm told. I'm sure you have a lot of first hand experience. I'll have to take your word on that. And a reading problem too! So once again you are basing an opinion on 3rd party information that you have no idea is reliable. Well, I also read what you and rushmc write, which provides pretty good confirmation. Do YOU believe that a CEO, president and chairman of a company has no involvement whatsoever in running the company, all the while drawing a salary from it? What part of "I don't care" did you have trouble understanding? Let me repeat it for you so you get it "I DON"T CARE". Clear enough? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 1,662 #86 July 18, 2012 Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote http://factcheck.org/2012/07/factcheck-to-obama-camp-your-complaint-is-all-wet/ Of course, that was written BEFORE Bain's SEC filings came to light stating that in 2000, 2001 and 2002 Mitt was CEO, President, Chairman and sole shareholder. Hard to believe that a CEO, president and chairman of a company has no involvement whatsoever in running the company. Unless you live in the GOP alternate universe. So what. Admission of defeat there, I'd say. Nope, everything is still here. Alternate realities are like that, I'm told. I'm sure you have a lot of first hand experience. I'll have to take your word on that. And a reading problem too! So once again you are basing an opinion on 3rd party information that you have no idea is reliable. Well, I also read what you and rushmc write, which provides pretty good confirmation. Do YOU believe that a CEO, president and chairman of a company has no involvement whatsoever in running the company, all the while drawing a salary from it? What part of "I don't care" did you have trouble understanding? Let me repeat it for you so you get it "I DON"T CARE". Clear enough? OK, so you don't care if Romney is a liar or a felon (or both), you will support him anyway. Got it.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #87 July 18, 2012 Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote http://factcheck.org/2012/07/factcheck-to-obama-camp-your-complaint-is-all-wet/ Of course, that was written BEFORE Bain's SEC filings came to light stating that in 2000, 2001 and 2002 Mitt was CEO, President, Chairman and sole shareholder. Hard to believe that a CEO, president and chairman of a company has no involvement whatsoever in running the company. Unless you live in the GOP alternate universe. So what. Admission of defeat there, I'd say. Nope, everything is still here. Alternate realities are like that, I'm told. I'm sure you have a lot of first hand experience. I'll have to take your word on that. And a reading problem too! So once again you are basing an opinion on 3rd party information that you have no idea is reliable. Well, I also read what you and rushmc write, which provides pretty good confirmation. Do YOU believe that a CEO, president and chairman of a company has no involvement whatsoever in running the company, all the while drawing a salary from it? What part of "I don't care" did you have trouble understanding? Let me repeat it for you so you get it "I DON"T CARE". Clear enough? OK, so you don't care if Romney is a liar or a felon (or both), you will support him anyway. Got it. Over Obama? You bet. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ChangoLanzao 0 #88 July 18, 2012 "Though Brooks Jackson and Glenn Kessler have become heroes to the Romney campaign and its Republican backers, these “independent fact-checkers” have found themselves increasingly isolated within the journalistic community as more news outlets note the contradictory Bain filings and call for more disclosures by Romney’s camp." This is pertinent too: Romney’s ‘Fact-Checker’ Cover-up Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #89 July 19, 2012 QuoteQuote OK, so you don't care if Romney is a liar or a felon (or both), you will support him anyway. Got it. Over Obama? You bet. So how far does this go, exactly? What if David Duke were the nominee? How about Joe Lieberman....a DINO if there ever was one? Goebels? The head of Richard Nixon? What if Romney were an orthodox Mormon bigamist? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,150 #90 July 19, 2012 Anything is better than a socialist kenyan pinko communist. Probably drives a smart car too. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
headoverheels 292 #91 July 19, 2012 Quote Probably drives a smart car too. Probably a stretch limo Smart Car, like those stretch Hummers you see. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #92 July 19, 2012 QuoteQuoteQuote OK, so you don't care if Romney is a liar or a felon (or both), you will support him anyway. Got it. Over Obama? You bet. So how far does this go, exactly? What if David Duke were the nominee? How about Joe Lieberman....a DINO if there ever was one? Goebels? The head of Richard Nixon? What if Romney were an orthodox Mormon bigamist? I don't care when he left Bain. When he left has no effect on whether I will vote for him or Obama. Especially since Obama has told some whoppers that make when Romney left Bain insignificant. Nice try at spin, though. Keep trying and one day you might be as good as Kallend. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,456 #93 July 19, 2012 >I don't care when he left Bain. When he left has no effect on whether I will vote for >him or Obama. Well, nothing he can do would affect whether you will vote for him. For many staunch democrats, nothing will prevent them from voting for Obama. But a great many people will care whether or not he's been lying to the SEC. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 3 #94 July 19, 2012 Quote>I don't care when he left Bain. When he left has no effect on whether I will vote for >him or Obama. Well, nothing he can do would affect whether you will vote for him. For many staunch democrats, nothing will prevent them from voting for Obama. But a great many people will care whether or not he's been lying to the SEC. Bill, with all due respect, the people that are even aware of the SEC are probably people who will vote for Rmoney anyway.quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #95 July 19, 2012 Quote>I don't care when he left Bain. When he left has no effect on whether I will vote for >him or Obama. Well, nothing he can do would affect whether you will vote for him. I never said that. Knock it off with the SCBS. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #96 July 19, 2012 QuoteQuote>I don't care when he left Bain. When he left has no effect on whether I will vote for >him or Obama. Well, nothing he can do would affect whether you will vote for him. I never said that. Knock it off with the SCBS. You said quite clearly that you'd support him even if he were a proven liar or felon, so what part of Bill's statement was inaccurate? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #97 July 19, 2012 QuoteQuoteQuote>I don't care when he left Bain. When he left has no effect on whether I will vote for >him or Obama. Well, nothing he can do would affect whether you will vote for him. I never said that. Knock it off with the SCBS. You said quite clearly that you'd support him even if he were a proven liar or felon, so what part of Bill's statement was inaccurate? I said I didn't care when he left Bain. I never said I would vote for him no matter what he did. And before you start your usual word parsing, I' not getting into a multiple page thread with you where you try and tell me what I said. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,456 #98 July 19, 2012 >You said quite clearly that you'd support him even if he were a proven liar or felon, so >what part of Bill's statement was inaccurate? Well, Gravitymaster said he'd vote for Romney over Obama even if Romney: -lied about when he left Bain -was a felon -was lying about other things To be fair, if Romney murdered someone tomorrow, then that wouldn't be covered under those conditions, and Gravitymaster conceivably might consider not voting for him. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 3 #99 July 19, 2012 Well, where was Romney in 1985 and what did he know about "salamander"? I really wish he'd come clean and show us some sort of proof he wasn't involved in the murders. quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
devildog 0 #100 July 19, 2012 Well, its not like he killed a border agent or anything. Or killed a US citizen w/o due process...You stop breathing for a few minutes and everyone jumps to conclusions. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
