Recommended Posts
kallend 1,853
Quote
Consider me to be a accused of rape and consider you to be a Texas prosecutor. Maybe in thirty years there will be enough evidence to cause a reasonable doubt in your mind. Go on. Tell me how my explanation that there are plenty of alternative explanations is ridiculous. Shoot. Had the guy been convicted on computer model evidence then there would have been no need for actual raw DNA data. DNA evidence showing he didn't do it? it would be impossible if the computer models showed that he did...
Shitty analogy.
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
turtlespeed 212
QuoteQuote
Consider me to be a accused of rape and consider you to be a Texas prosecutor. Maybe in thirty years there will be enough evidence to cause a reasonable doubt in your mind. Go on. Tell me how my explanation that there are plenty of alternative explanations is ridiculous. Shoot. Had the guy been convicted on computer model evidence then there would have been no need for actual raw DNA data. DNA evidence showing he didn't do it? it would be impossible if the computer models showed that he did...
Shitty analogy.
Just because you disagree with it doesn not make it as you would describe it.
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun
kallend 1,853
QuoteQuoteQuote
Consider me to be a accused of rape and consider you to be a Texas prosecutor. Maybe in thirty years there will be enough evidence to cause a reasonable doubt in your mind. Go on. Tell me how my explanation that there are plenty of alternative explanations is ridiculous. Shoot. Had the guy been convicted on computer model evidence then there would have been no need for actual raw DNA data. DNA evidence showing he didn't do it? it would be impossible if the computer models showed that he did...
Shitty analogy.
Just because you disagree with it doesn not make it as you would describe it.
You miss the point.
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
brenthutch 422
http://musicifi.com/gossip/Massive-Fish-Kill-in-the-Chesapeake-Bay-Is-American-Wildlife-Cursed-4471331.html
You must be so smart that you think that Socrates and Plato were morons.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eQNHBUqfLnM
[url]
brenthutch 422
QuoteQuoteQuoteQuote
Consider me to be a accused of rape and consider you to be a Texas prosecutor. Maybe in thirty years there will be enough evidence to cause a reasonable doubt in your mind. Go on. Tell me how my explanation that there are plenty of alternative explanations is ridiculous. Shoot. Had the guy been convicted on computer model evidence then there would have been no need for actual raw DNA data. DNA evidence showing he didn't do it? it would be impossible if the computer models showed that he did...
Shitty analogy.
Just because you disagree with it doesn not make it as you would describe it.
You miss the point.
What point? You had a point to make?
I think we're all Bozos on this bus.
Falcon5232, SCS8170, SCSA353, POPS9398, DS239
billvon 2,772
>was due to the warm?
Do you think that weather is the same as climate?
mnealtx 0
Quote>Do you think that the fish die off in the Chesapeake from the cold
>was due to the warm?
Do you think that weather is the same as climate?
Of course not - everyone knows that any pattern that doesn't support AGW is 'weather' and everything else is 'climate'.
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706
Quote>Do you think that the fish die off in the Chesapeake from the cold
>was due to the warm?
Do you think that weather is the same as climate?
Again, no.
But when weather is hapening that we were told was a thing of the past, then people start getting pissed off. When Hansen said that thew Russian summer was a weather event, but a weather event that wouldn't have happened without global warming then the door gets opened. If hot weather is caused by global warming then cold weather must be either caused by global warming or happen in spite of global warming.
Hot weather is now attributed to global warming. Cold weather? Bahhh. That's just weather.
My wife is hotter than your wife.
Holy cow! I wrote that a couple of days ago and now look what was released just today!
http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/2011/010511.html
I'm sad to say that despite the low ice extent in the Atlantic, the northwest passage looks pretty well socked in with ice. We'll have to see how the ice recovers with the dissipation of that blocking high and ask ourselves how this will affect ice extent this summer.
This is not hard to look at. It doesn't take a Ph.D. to figure out what the heck is going to happen. Another interesting thing to look at is the purple median lines for 1979-2000. Not quite there, but it's still looks fairly close in those areas that weren't hammered by a repeating event (oscillation).
My wife is hotter than your wife.
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites