mamajumps 0 #1 January 11, 2008 http://www.theledger.com/article/20080111/NEWS/801110408/1039 This is one sick f**K! He should not be allowed to consume oxygen any longer, especially since he confessed! What a piece of shit! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pop 0 #2 January 11, 2008 Quote http://www.theledger.com/article/20080111/NEWS/801110408/1039 This is one sick f**K! He should not be allowed to consume oxygen any longer, especially since he confessed! What a piece of shit! This is one of those cases where I see the death penalty to be appropriate. The kid was born, but wasnt given a chance at living. This guy shouldnt have that chance either.7 ounce wonders, music and dogs that are not into beer Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lastchance 0 #3 January 11, 2008 I think an appropriate punishment for this guy is to be beaten nearly to death only to be somewhat nursed back to health and the beaten nearly to death again and again and again. Let him live the remainder of his days in severe, constant, agonizing, excruciating pain. Instant death would be to good for this sick piece of shit. I may be getting old but I got to see all the cool bands. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Armour666 0 #4 January 11, 2008 I like that use because the second time around they know exactly what’s coming and it worse for them. Also a good use for medical experiments that wouldn’t even do on animals and lab rats.SO this one time at band camp..... "Of all the things I've lost I miss my mind the most." Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
diablopilot 2 #5 January 11, 2008 Small potatoes. This occurs very often in China where there is the one child limit. Try not buying anything from China.---------------------------------------------- You're not as good as you think you are. Seriously. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
diablopilot 2 #6 January 11, 2008 I can't agree with that. Torture is not the answer, and revenge solves nothing. We simply want him to never ever do it again. If he's dead, he can't, and he's not a drain on resources.---------------------------------------------- You're not as good as you think you are. Seriously. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JohnRich 4 #7 January 11, 2008 QuoteThis is one of those cases where I see the death penalty to be appropriate. So you're ready to execute him, even though he hasn't been tried in court yet? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lawrocket 3 #8 January 11, 2008 I think a little time spent in the general population at prison would probably end up in some form of justice. My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mamajumps 0 #9 January 11, 2008 Quote Quote This is one of those cases where I see the death penalty to be appropriate. So you're ready to execute him, even though he hasn't been tried in court yet? Why should he be tried (wasting tax-payers money) when he confessed, explained what he did (in detail) and why? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,772 #10 January 11, 2008 >We simply want him to never ever do it again. If he's dead, he can't, >and he's not a drain on resources. Agreed. Execution or life in prison with no parole - whatever's cheaper. Not because some will enjoy watching him die or rot in prison, but because that way he can never harm anyone again. Revenge helps no one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lefty 0 #11 January 11, 2008 QuoteExecution or life in prison with no parole - whatever's cheaper. My sentiments exactly.Provoking a reaction isn't the same thing as saying something meaningful. -Calvin Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lastchance 0 #12 January 11, 2008 I had to think about that for a second, thinking they never put these people in general population. But he is not a child molester, he is just one sadistic SOB. So the general population would probably take care of him but I still don't think the tax payers should be responsible for keeping this SOB alive for one second. I may be getting old but I got to see all the cool bands. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 18 #13 January 11, 2008 Quote>We simply want him to never ever do it again. If he's dead, he can't, >and he's not a drain on resources. Agreed. Execution or life in prison with no parole - whatever's cheaper. Not because some will enjoy watching him die or rot in prison, but because that way he can never harm anyone again. Revenge helps no one. You throw a piece of perspective which I never thought of before. That being "whatever's cheaper"! Very nice. I agree."America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Royd 0 #14 January 12, 2008 Quote This is one of those cases where I see the death penalty to be appropriate. The kid was born, but wasnt given a chance at living. This guy shouldnt have that chance either. The doctors could have taken her life three seconds before she took her first breath, and all would have been well with the world. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Casurf1978 0 #15 January 12, 2008 Oh yeah those doctors are bastards. Like the one who performed one on a women who had conjoined twins that had only one set of lungs and one heart, or the woman who had metastic melanoma and needed immediate chemo, or wait how about the one where the fetus had a three-chamberd heart and would never live. Yeah, the doc that performed all these is in the same class as this guy. Argumentum ad ignorantiam plain and simple. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
happythoughts 0 #16 January 12, 2008 QuoteThe child's mother, Juana Rodriguez, was also interviewed. She said Gomez-Romero was "violently aggressive" toward their daughter and he would carry their daughter by her hands into the bedroom and close the door, and shortly afterward she would hear their daughter begin to cry. This had been going on for a while and the mother knew. Seems like there needs to be some space in jail for two. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nanook 1 #17 January 12, 2008 Yeah, I was thinking the same _____________________________ "The trouble with quotes on the internet is that you can never know if they are genuine" - Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
aprilcat 0 #18 January 12, 2008 QuoteQuoteThe child's mother, Juana Rodriguez, was also interviewed. She said Gomez-Romero was "violently aggressive" toward their daughter and he would carry their daughter by her hands into the bedroom and close the door, and shortly afterward she would hear their daughter begin to cry. This had been going on for a while and the mother knew. Seems like there needs to be some space in jail for two. I'm thinking Hedda Nussbaum...Joel Steinberg and Lisa Steinberg. This new perp probably had the mother terrified. Let the courts do what they gotta do but NO protective custody for him...put him in Gen Pop. He'll get whats coming to him. If you really think about it...we're out in GP too and you get what you got coming to you. Be decent, you may live a natural life. Act like an asshat and you won't ever make to court. do something vile and end up in jail and you're own your own, Abused women in this situation with children can't protect themselves, and that cycle of abuse seems to be 'family tradition'; some rise above but this is an extreme case.Focus on who hurt the baby and what was the mother afraid of.~~~April Camelot II, the Electric Boogaloo! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 1 #19 January 12, 2008 Quote Quote This is one of those cases where I see the death penalty to be appropriate. So you're ready to execute him, even though he hasn't been tried in court yet? Why....that's refreshingly liberal of you, John! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tkhayes 300 #20 January 12, 2008 no one said that - let him have his day in court. THEN when he is convicted, turn his ass loose int he general population in prison. he will either get killed or have to become somebody's bitch forever for protection. either one is pretty good justice.... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pop 0 #21 January 14, 2008 QuoteQuoteThis is one of those cases where I see the death penalty to be appropriate. So you're ready to execute him, even though he hasn't been tried in court yet? I'd be ready to execute him if after he went to trial he was found guilty and the accusations made against him were proven true. Should it be proven tha the article is telling thwe truth, the death penalty is appropriate in this case.7 ounce wonders, music and dogs that are not into beer Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pop 0 #22 January 14, 2008 Quote Quote Quote This is one of those cases where I see the death penalty to be appropriate. So you're ready to execute him, even though he hasn't been tried in court yet? Why should he be tried (wasting tax-payers money) when he confessed, explained what he did (in detail) and why? I dont think a confession is enough. Recall John Mark Karr's confesion in the Ramsey case? The guy just wanted publicity.7 ounce wonders, music and dogs that are not into beer Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,379 #23 January 14, 2008 Quote Quote Quote This is one of those cases where I see the death penalty to be appropriate. So you're ready to execute him, even though he hasn't been tried in court yet? Why should he be tried (wasting tax-payers money) when he confessed, explained what he did (in detail) and why? Because (crazy piece of info coming at ya here) confessions don't always mean that someone is guilty! Some mentally ill people will confess to crimes for attention, other suspects will have confessions beaten out of them by the authorities. If we take the view that a confession is sufficient evidence to completely circumvent the legal process then some innocent people will be jailed/ executed and some guilty people will go free to re-offend. Shortcutting the system for any reason is a bad idea and no, it's not possible to make an exception 'just this once because we really really do know he definitely did it'.Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 1 #24 January 14, 2008 JohnRich, pop & jakee: Bravo. You 3 guys all get it. Genuine rule of law, and honoring it in practice (as opposed to "in the breach"), is neither liberal nor conservative. It neither coddles criminal defendants nor brutalizes them. It is, quite simply, the only legitimate way for a democratic nation to enact justice. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tigra 0 #25 January 15, 2008 Abused and afraid or not, the mother did nothing for 4 months while her child was abused right under her nose. She should be facing criminal charges as well. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites