0
Gawain

So, Folks Across the Pond, Prince Harry to Deploy...

Recommended Posts

Quote

Quote

It is, more than likely, simply a coincidence



nuts, the royal family is in cahoots with Haliburton who run the british parliament. Now, with Tony Blair and GWB under the secret pay of the Heinz corporation, who are held hostage by Pepsi-co, it is obvious that the British pull back is direct means of protecting young Harry from getting his hair sandy.

it's a conspiracy

what would people here say if young Chelsea or one of the Bush daughters were on track to go over in a couple months and the US would suddenly annouce a withdrawal in the same timetable????

they'd say nothing - if they knew what's good for them and they wanted to keep getting ketchup rations >:(



I expect they're trying to draw attention away from the OKC bombing conspiracy, those sneaky royals.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

You'll have to forgive us for having traditions.



Tea time is a tradition. Royalty is silly.

Sorry, that's just my opinion. If you want to honor someone for their blood line, have at it.



No more silly than making common actors into Royalty. Or treating some slapper who banged an old man till he croaked then pretended to be Marilyn Monroe until she OD'ed like a goddess. Have they finished fighting over her corpse over there yet?:S



At least actors did something for their noteriety other than being born.

Royality is silly and outdated. Accept it and move on.

Or kiss my "royal" ass.:o

If royalty is so obviously 'silly and outdated', why hasn't it been abolished yet? Or could it be that there are actually good reasons for their persistence?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote



At least actors did something for their noteriety other than being born.

Royality is silly and outdated. Accept it and move on.

Or kiss my "royal" ass.:o



Yup, John Wayne and Ronald Reagan did a great job fighting for freedom from Hollywood in WWII.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

You'll have to forgive us for having traditions.



Tea time is a tradition. Royalty is silly.

Sorry, that's just my opinion. If you want to honor someone for their blood line, have at it.



No more silly than making common actors into Royalty. Or treating some slapper who banged an old man till he croaked then pretended to be Marilyn Monroe until she OD'ed like a goddess. Have they finished fighting over her corpse over there yet?:S



At least actors did something for their noteriety other than being born.

Royality is silly and outdated. Accept it and move on.

Or kiss my "royal" ass.:o



Having a Royal family is the best soap opera of all. I wouldn't want to be one at all, their lives are not their own.
When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy.
Lucius Annaeus Seneca

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote



At least actors did something for their noteriety other than being born.

Royality is silly and outdated. Accept it and move on.

Or kiss my "royal" ass.:o



Your talking about notoriety, right? There are many in US (political) history who easily could claim that: Drinkers, liars, actors, another actor, killer/another liar ...

And "you" kissed all their a****, right? OK, now move on..

Long live the Queen, my aunt. B|B|

dudeist skydiver # 3105

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think its good, both Harry & William are good for our country and are proving to be very respectable. It annoys me when I see pictures of Harry having been out and had a few drinks with his friends. So what for gods sake. He deserves a night off like anyone else, paticularly as his spare time will be full of other royal duties. He doesn't just have a military career.

Heres hoping the throne skips Charles and goes straight to the younger blood

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

You'll have to forgive us for having traditions.



Tea time is a tradition. Royalty is silly.

Sorry, that's just my opinion. If you want to honor someone for their blood line, have at it.



No more silly than making common actors into Royalty. Or treating some slapper who banged an old man till he croaked then pretended to be Marilyn Monroe until she OD'ed like a goddess. Have they finished fighting over her corpse over there yet?:S



At least actors did something for their noteriety other than being born.

Royality is silly and outdated. Accept it and move on.

Or kiss my "royal" ass.:o

If royalty is so obviously 'silly and outdated', why hasn't it been abolished yet? Or could it be that there are actually good reasons for their persistence?



The monarchy was abolished in 1649, but restored in 1660. Many countries have abolished their monarchies.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abolished_monarchy
Monarchies abolished in the 20th century
Portugal, 1910
Korea, 1910 (native monarchy abolished; replaced by rule by Japan, a monarchy, through 1945)
China, 1912 (revolution/coup d'état)
Russia, 1917 (revolution)
Montenegro, 1918 (referendum deposed King and united with Serbia)
Germany, 1918 (All on account of German defeat in World War I)
Prussia, 1918
Bavaria, 1918
Württemberg, 1918
Saxony, 1918
Hesse and by Rhine, 1918
Baden, 1918
Saxe-Weimar-Eisenach, 1918
Mecklenburg-Schwerin, 1918
Mecklenburg-Strelitz, 1918
Oldenburg, 1918
Brunswick, 1918
Anhalt, 1918
Saxe-Coburg and Gotha, 1918
Saxe-Meiningen, 1918
Saxe-Altenburg, 1918
Waldeck-Pyrmont, 1918
Lippe, 1918
Schaumburg-Lippe, 1918
Schwarzburg-Rudolstadt, 1918
Schwarzburg-Sondershausen, 1918
Reuss Senior Line, 1918
Reuss Junior Line, 1918
Austria, 1918
(Finland, 1918 - never in effect)
(Lithuania, 1918 - never in effect)
Poland, (Regency Kingdom of Poland (1916-1918)), 1918
Hungary, 1918 (restored 1920, although throne remained vacant)
Bukhara (Uzbekistan), 1920
Turkey, 1922 (coup d'état)
Greece, 1924 (restored 1935)
Croatia, 1943
Iceland, 1944
Yugoslavia, 1945 (Communist reconstruction)
Manchukuo, 1945
Hungary, 1946
Italy, 1946 (referendum)
Bulgaria, 1946
Albania, 1946
Sarawak, 1946
Romania, 1947
Indian Princely States, 1947-1950
Ireland, 1949
India, 1950
Egypt, 1953 (coup d'état)
Vietnam, 1955 (referendum)
Pakistan, 1956
Tunisia, 1957
Iraq, 1958 (coup d'état)
Ghana, 1960
South Africa, 1961
Rwanda, 1961
Tanganyika, 1962
Yemen, 1962
Nigeria, 1963
Uganda, 1963
Kenya, 1964
Zanzibar, 1964
Burundi, 1966
Malawi, 1966
Maldives, 1968
Libya, 1969 (coup d'état)
Gambia, 1970
Guyana, 1970
Sierra Leone, 1971
Ceylon, 1972
Greece, 1973 (coup d'état, confirmed by referendum 1974)
Afghanistan, 1973 (coup d'état)
Ethiopia, 1974 (coup d'état)
Malta, 1974
Laos, 1975 (coup d'état)
Sikkim, 1975 (when Sikkim became part of India)
Trinidad and Tobago, 1976
Iran, 1979 (revolution)
Central African Empire, 1979
Fiji, 1987 (coup d'état)
Mauritius, 1992

--------------------------
Chuck Norris doesn't do push-ups, he pushes the Earth down.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well, bully for them... Thay can and did suit themselves. We, on the otherhand like our Royal family and couldn't give a flying fuck what anyone else thinks. It's none of the business.:)

(.)Y(.)
Chivalry is not dead; it only sleeps for want of work to do. - Jerome K Jerome

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

You'll have to forgive us for having traditions.



Tea time is a tradition. Royalty is silly.

Sorry, that's just my opinion. If you want to honor someone for their blood line, have at it.



Seems to me Prince Harry is acting on more than his bloodline.
So I try and I scream and I beg and I sigh
Just to prove I'm alive, and it's alright
'Cause tonight there's a way I'll make light of my treacherous life
Make light!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
<>

Elect? Elect? You don't vote for kings. ........

Quote


Woman: Well how'd you become king then?

King Arthur: The Lady of the Lake, her arm clad in the purest shimmering samite held aloft Excalibur from the bosom of the water, signifying by divine providence that I, Arthur, was to carry Excalibur. THAT is why I am your king.
Dennis: [interrupting] Listen, strange women lyin' in ponds distributin' swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony.



(.)Y(.)
Chivalry is not dead; it only sleeps for want of work to do. - Jerome K Jerome

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Your list is faulty. I believe that quite a few of the countries stated as abolishing monarchies actually rid themselves of our monarchy when they gained independence.

Similarly, quite a few eastern european countries listed had their monarchies removed by force once they were behind the iron curtain. Are you trying to suggest that the UK should become communist?;)
Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


At least actors did something for their noteriety other than being born.

Royality is silly and outdated. Accept it and move on.

Or kiss my "royal" ass.:o



I agree that the only thing royalty did to be royalty is being born among royalty. However, how is it diferent from being a Bush? You will agree that George Bush is not the brightest dude in the block, and he is president because his family had the money and the power.

I prefer royalty, since they inbreed they have a shorter life span that your president.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote



At least actors did something for their noteriety other than being born.

Royality is silly and outdated. Accept it and move on.

Or kiss my "royal" ass.:o



Your talking about notoriety, right? There are many in US (political) history who easily could claim that: Drinkers, liars, actors, another actor, killer/another liar ...

And "you" kissed all their a****, right? OK, now move on..

Long live the Queen, my aunt. B|B|



LOL:D
When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy.
Lucius Annaeus Seneca

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Or he can rely on his SAS minders to watch his back




Yea, 'causeno doubtthey can catch incoming RPG's with their teeth:S
When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy.
Lucius Annaeus Seneca

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


I prefer royalty, since they inbreed they have a shorter life span that your president.



Well, I would not bet my money on that: Having a look at the loooong fruitful lifes of British Royals - many of them reach an age of nearly 100, that's not bad :P :)
Not to forget about the entertainment value ... :D:D

dudeist skydiver # 3105

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0