Recommended Posts
Quote>I am struggling to think of how anyone's life is affected by the
>knowledge that Mercury is the rock right next to the sun.
It may not be. But in terms of relevance, surely knowing the planets in your solar system is more important than knowing the planets of a fictional solar system.
People don't know about Krypton because it's important to their lives. They know it because Superman has been one of the most successful franchises ever, with 6 (more?) movies, an old TV series, the Lois and Clark and Smallville series, and of course the comic book itself, and saturday morning TV. Same applies to Simpsons knowledge.
No value judgement is being made here - people are just choosing to pick pop culture as a leisure pursuit over reviewing what they learned in school for the rest of their lives.
But if you want, make a book of "Important information every American should know." It might even sell a good number of copies, though it won't reach the people you pity so much.
raggdoll 0
The poll is skewed. Who were the people interviewed?
Do they have children (knowledge of Harry Potter would be applicable here--perhaps these were working parents trying to instill the importance of books by reading to their children at bedtime after working a 10 - 12 hour day).
Were the respondents educated and if so, how educated? I know a 68 year old man who is currently learning to read because when he was young, he had to drop out of school in order to work to support his mother and siblings. Watching television may be the only source of entertainment he's able to enjoy because he's not literate--yet. Reading a newspaper is out of the question for him currently, though it is an eventual goal.
Perhaps the respondents don't have televisions, or cannot afford televisions. Perhaps some don't have cars with working radios or must rely on public transportation or don't listen to the BBC because they don't understand what the news discussions are. Perhaps they are too embarrassed by their lack of knowledge to ask someone who Tony Blair is, for fear of being thought and subsequently treated as an idiot, or worse.
Some may have to work 16+ hour days, as my parents both did, and after coming home and taking care of the children, find that they are simply too tired by having to work and support families to actually care about what is occurring outside of their own existence. These people are merely trying to survive.
The results are sad, yes. But sometimes, the reasonings behind the results are sadder and might require more explanation and thought than blaming education, teachers, lifestyles, televisions, etc.
Just another view.
Do they have children (knowledge of Harry Potter would be applicable here--perhaps these were working parents trying to instill the importance of books by reading to their children at bedtime after working a 10 - 12 hour day).
Were the respondents educated and if so, how educated? I know a 68 year old man who is currently learning to read because when he was young, he had to drop out of school in order to work to support his mother and siblings. Watching television may be the only source of entertainment he's able to enjoy because he's not literate--yet. Reading a newspaper is out of the question for him currently, though it is an eventual goal.
Perhaps the respondents don't have televisions, or cannot afford televisions. Perhaps some don't have cars with working radios or must rely on public transportation or don't listen to the BBC because they don't understand what the news discussions are. Perhaps they are too embarrassed by their lack of knowledge to ask someone who Tony Blair is, for fear of being thought and subsequently treated as an idiot, or worse.
Some may have to work 16+ hour days, as my parents both did, and after coming home and taking care of the children, find that they are simply too tired by having to work and support families to actually care about what is occurring outside of their own existence. These people are merely trying to survive.
The results are sad, yes. But sometimes, the reasonings behind the results are sadder and might require more explanation and thought than blaming education, teachers, lifestyles, televisions, etc.
Just another view.
A Zobgy poll likely is a decently representative sample of Americans, though likely a phone poll, which has small bias.
I find more fault likely with the questions (GIGO) than the sample obtained.
I find more fault likely with the questions (GIGO) than the sample obtained.
Shotgun 1
I fail to see how knowing the year that 9/11 occurred would affect anyone's life.
Supreme Court Justices - yeah, the general public could do with knowing a bit more about that.
Harry Potter vs. Tony Blair? Who cares? Personally, Harry Potter doesn't do anything for me. But, well, neither does Tony Blair. 50% knowing who he is? Doesn't sound like a bad number to me.
The Iliad and the Odyssey? Why do people need to be concerned with outdated boring poetry? I mean, if that's your thing, fine. But most people have no reason to read that crap. I mean, after all, we've got the Bible to read if we want to read outdated boring crap. Why read someone else's delusions on how 'gods' have affected our lives, when we have a much more current version which clearly shows that Jesus and his 'father' are the characters that _really_ control our lives???
Where the planets are? Useful to know if you work in any field that might involve going to other planets - which is a very small percentage of the population. And if you're just curious, the info is fairly accessible from many different sources.
Three branches of government? Again, yes I'll agree with that one - the general public should have a better understanding of our government.
Most recent Supreme Court appointee? Same as the last question.
But most of these poll questions are just silly. They sound like they were written by some elitist who wants to make himself feel better by showing that he has more knowledge of useless facts than the general public. Now if all the people who were polled were to write a list of questions that actually pertain to their daily lives, I wonder if the pollster would be able to accurately answer even half of those questions.
Supreme Court Justices - yeah, the general public could do with knowing a bit more about that.
Harry Potter vs. Tony Blair? Who cares? Personally, Harry Potter doesn't do anything for me. But, well, neither does Tony Blair. 50% knowing who he is? Doesn't sound like a bad number to me.
The Iliad and the Odyssey? Why do people need to be concerned with outdated boring poetry? I mean, if that's your thing, fine. But most people have no reason to read that crap. I mean, after all, we've got the Bible to read if we want to read outdated boring crap. Why read someone else's delusions on how 'gods' have affected our lives, when we have a much more current version which clearly shows that Jesus and his 'father' are the characters that _really_ control our lives???
Where the planets are? Useful to know if you work in any field that might involve going to other planets - which is a very small percentage of the population. And if you're just curious, the info is fairly accessible from many different sources.
Three branches of government? Again, yes I'll agree with that one - the general public should have a better understanding of our government.
Most recent Supreme Court appointee? Same as the last question.
But most of these poll questions are just silly. They sound like they were written by some elitist who wants to make himself feel better by showing that he has more knowledge of useless facts than the general public. Now if all the people who were polled were to write a list of questions that actually pertain to their daily lives, I wonder if the pollster would be able to accurately answer even half of those questions.
Just so you know, it was Taylor Hicks. However, I agree completely with Bill's point.
Chris
_________________________________________
Chris
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites