EBSB52 0
Quote
In a recent post, Kennedy wrote something about calling me an assbag w/o even a public admonishment.
Hmm. I checked the entire thread and your post was the only one containing "assbag".
Edit: What's even more funny is that you are complaining about attacks after referring to all police officers as "pigs" 17 times (I counted) in a recent thread.
RoadRash 0
QuoteSee, this makes DZ.com's rules a joke and draws obvious attention to the fact that they're absolutley subjective. Could it bo more obvius that the rules are for anyone with a conservative message to write what they want. In a recent post, Kennedy wrote something about calling me an assbag w/o even a public admonishment.
Here it is from my perspective:
1. Retaliate and be suspended
2. Draw attention to it and be called a whiner
3. Write the greenies and be told it's not an attack - but then return it to the conservtaives and rule 1,2, and 3 apply.
Let's get this straight - I'm not offended and prefer to exchange niceties like this. What I am offended by is the blatant actions of the greenies that overlook this stuff and penalize me when I return the serve. Actually it has been Biil so far that has done this, so I don't want to include them all.
I'm gonna be sure and send him a link to your post criticizing the moderation of this website...I believe that is one of the few things that isn't tolerated...this ain't no damned democracy...Have a nice day!
~R+R
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
Fly the friendly skies...^_^...})ii({...^_~...
Fly the friendly skies...^_^...})ii({...^_~...
EBSB52 0
QuoteQuote
In a recent post, Kennedy wrote something about calling me an assbag w/o even a public admonishment.
Hmm. I checked the entire thread and your post was the only one containing "assbag".
Edit: What's even more funny is that you are complaining about attacks after referring to all police officers as "pigs" 17 times (I counted) in a recent thread.
Hmm. I checked the entire thread and your post was the only one containing "assbag".
Hmm, I went and rechecked it too and didn't find that I wrote, "assbag" anywhere. Please, corect me if I'm wrong, but I didn't find it in my text. If you can't find it maybe you can admit that you misstated that.
Edit: What's even more funny is that you are complaining about attacks after referring to all police officers as "pigs" 17 times (I counted) in a recent thread.
Your brevity on, "attacks" from what should have been, personal attacks seesm to be intentional. See, the rule is about personal attacks, and my statement wasn't directed at anyone. In fact, I don't know of any cops on the forum. Even if I did, the statements were general and never directed at anyone. I have no problem referring to cops in any derogatory way, even though there are a couple good ones out there,
So your referrence that I'm being hypocritical about personal attacks is moot due to your reference given is not a personal attack.
JohnMitchell 14
Just a small thing, but the NATO 7.62 is the same as a Winchester .308, which is a shortened version of the venerable 30.06. Both can be very accurate rounds.QuoteKennedy's advice on The AR-10. NATO 762 (Winchester 30.06) with all the punch and accuracy that lies behind it - Mike.
RoadRash 0
QuoteSee, this makes DZ.com's rules a joke and draws obvious attention to the fact that they're absolutley subjective. Could it bo more obvius that the rules are for anyone with a conservative message to write what they want. In a recent post, Kennedy wrote something about calling me an assbag w/o even a public admonishment.
Just thought I would point out where you said the word assbag....
Ok...but isn't all this talk off topic anyway?
I was hoping to learn more about the AR-15, but I think I'll just watch History of the Gun on The History Channel...I can watch it without all the bickering, bitching, accusations, criticizing, and lies... ~R+R
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
Fly the friendly skies...^_^...})ii({...^_~...
Fly the friendly skies...^_^...})ii({...^_~...
Jimbo 0
QuoteI can watch it without all the bickering, bitching, accusations, criticizing, and lies...
But, but, but . . . What's the fun in that?
-
Jim
"Like" - The modern day comma
Good bye, my friends. You are missed.
Good bye, my friends. You are missed.
QuoteJust a small thing, but the NATO 7.62 is the same as a Winchester .308, which is a shortened version of the venerable 30.06. Both can be very accurate rounds.
Doh!
Sorry about that. Regarding the "difference between .223" & 5.56mm NATO. Apparently it used to be the same thing - until Nato changed the standard slightly in the 1980's after some shoot-off between the original .223" Remington, The British 4.5mm (same cartridge necked down with longer, narrower, heavier bullet) & a "new" 5.56mm with a (slightly) shorter case & longer, heavier bullet for the same overall length.
From there, I'd suggest that a weapon chambered for .223" will chamber & fire 5.56mm NATO, and even conceivably 4.5mm (or was it 4.85mm... BUT WITHOUT THE PRECISE FIT! Hence the throat erosion.
Mike.
Taking the piss out of the FrenchAmericans since before it was fashionable.
Prenait la pisse hors du FrançaisCanadiens méridionaux puisqu'avant lui à la mode.
billvon 2,476
.thumb.jpg.4bb795e2eaf21b8b300039a5e1ec7f92.jpg)
>Your reading comprehension sucks and you prefer to remain
>ignorant . . .
Kennedy, consider this your one warning.
>Here it is from my perspective:
>1. Retaliate and be suspended
>2. Draw attention to it and be called a whiner
>3. Write the greenies and be told it's not an attack - but then
>return it to the conservtaives and rule 1,2, and 3 apply.
A good summary, along with 4) do not read things that make you angry.
>What I am offended by is the blatant actions of the greenies that
> overlook this stuff and penalize me when I return the serve.
Believe it or not, I don't spend all my time reading threads here; I actually do things like work and skydive on occasion. From the sticky on personal attacks from the top of the page:
-----------------------------
The moderators make an effort to keep track of the threads in the various forums. But with over 2000 posts a day on Dropzone.com, it's just not possible to read every post. If someone posts a personal attack and it is not deleted, there are two possibilities:
1. It wasn't really a personal attack in the view of the moderators
2. A moderator hasn't seen it yet
In such cases an email/PM to the moderators of that section can help us keep tabs on the threads that are getting rambunctious.
------------------------------
>ignorant . . .
Kennedy, consider this your one warning.
>Here it is from my perspective:
>1. Retaliate and be suspended
>2. Draw attention to it and be called a whiner
>3. Write the greenies and be told it's not an attack - but then
>return it to the conservtaives and rule 1,2, and 3 apply.
A good summary, along with 4) do not read things that make you angry.
>What I am offended by is the blatant actions of the greenies that
> overlook this stuff and penalize me when I return the serve.
Believe it or not, I don't spend all my time reading threads here; I actually do things like work and skydive on occasion. From the sticky on personal attacks from the top of the page:
-----------------------------
The moderators make an effort to keep track of the threads in the various forums. But with over 2000 posts a day on Dropzone.com, it's just not possible to read every post. If someone posts a personal attack and it is not deleted, there are two possibilities:
1. It wasn't really a personal attack in the view of the moderators
2. A moderator hasn't seen it yet
In such cases an email/PM to the moderators of that section can help us keep tabs on the threads that are getting rambunctious.
------------------------------
ahegeman 0
Definitely a way cool gun, but at $2.50 a round I wouldn't be able to afford to shoot it as much as I'd like.
---------------------------------------------------------------
There is a fine line between 'hobby' and 'mental illness'.
--Dave Barry
There is a fine line between 'hobby' and 'mental illness'.
--Dave Barry
ahegeman 0
QuoteMy only caviat... try not to order parts from bushmaster.com. SLOW ass service.
Yeah, I ordered some of the manuals from then a week ago and have yet to receive them.
---------------------------------------------------------------
There is a fine line between 'hobby' and 'mental illness'.
--Dave Barry
There is a fine line between 'hobby' and 'mental illness'.
--Dave Barry
QuoteThe 5.56 chamber is a little looser than the .223 standard. I'm not sure it really matters much, as I have put quite a few rounds of mil-spec ammo through a .223 chambers before I was made aware of this. I'm speculating that it might be more of a problem if you don't clean you firearm regularly.
There is a difference though, many manufacturers make you specify which one you want when you order a barrel/upper/parts kit.
Edited to add this link from Fulton Armory on 5.56 vs. .233 chambers: http://www.fulton-armory.com/556-vs-223-Chambers.htm
From my experience (at least with bushmasters) you can only interchange if your barrel (sp? I just chugged 3 beers and there is a spelling for each bottle that makes sense) is stamped with "5.56 NATO", otherwise your weapon should ONLY be fired with .223 rounds. something about gas pressures of the 5.56 being MUCH higher to the point of causing the barrel to bulge and/or explode if it isnt stamped as such.
Two wrongs don't make a right, however three lefts DO!
Your reading comprehension sucks and you prefer to remain ignorant, while I am happy with my choice of firearms and continue educating myself...
Nope, I like my position better.
See, this makes DZ.com's rules a joke and draws obvious attention to the fact that they're absolutley subjective. Could it bo more obvius that the rules are for anyone with a conservative message to write what they want. In a recent post, Kennedy wrote something about calling me an assbag w/o even a public admonishment.
Here it is from my perspective:
1. Retaliate and be suspended
2. Draw attention to it and be called a whiner
3. Write the greenies and be told it's not an attack - but then return it to the conservtaives and rule 1,2, and 3 apply.
Let's get this straight - I'm not offended and prefer to exchange niceties like this. What I am offended by is the blatant actions of the greenies that overlook this stuff and penalize me when I return the serve. Actually it has been Biil so far that has done this, so I don't want to include them all.