SudsyFist

You are so gonna pay.

You rule.

... or a pornographic memory... Hey, that's MY line!

Hey! Wyatt was Chet's brother. And Gary was Wyatt's friend. And Lisa had DSL's that make Jolie look like a turnip.

Drive faster.

In A-min, right?

I'm interested in seeing if anyone tops Angie Everhart. Photographic proof required.

Who's Wiat? You really did forget me, didn't you?

Good point. It took all of four weeks last time I bailed this site for everyone to forget me. Except Corn, bless him.

It doesn't work??? How can you say that? Torture has been used for centuries to obtain information. If it didn't work, it wouldn't have stood the test of time... I'll be clear: torture is an ineffective interrogation tool because it yields inconsistent, inaccurate data, especially when compared to the methods we employ that conform to laws and treaties. Your logic is highly flawed, and I'd suggest you visit Google and do some searching on this subject to see why.

Your painting a scenario that is so remote and lacking in so many variables that it's moot, dude. If you want to give carte blanche to troops to abuse anyone they detain for .001% of the scenarios where it might possibly be effective, then I've got a whole laundry list of similarly outrageous bullshit I can add to yours. EDIT: Sorry for sounding so harsh. I've got sand in my vagina.

Without external oversight, people *will* get out of hand. Quite a lot, actually. I'm not saying that there isn't oversight, but I'd feel much more comfortable if the policy, along with enforcement procedures, was documented and made public. This is exactly what makes me terribly uneasy. I don't think they should have the discretion to abuse detainees at will. What are you talking about? Do you even know how professional interrogators operate? Correction: you don't know how professional interrogators operate. Let me clue you in: it's got nothing to do with attorneys, daisies, and lollipops. Would you agree, then, with the same being done to our troops captured by the enemy? In the situation you provided, "twisting" isn't likely to yield good information. In fact, it can yield bad information, which, in many cases, is deadlier than none at all. Further, it's illegal. As far as I know, most bust-the-door-down types of units don't include on-hand interrogators in their missions. If that's the case, then I certainly hope that those soldiers and marines get good training on effective techniques to get the information that they need. Legal interrogation techniques work, plain and simple. And if you think something as obviously common as time-sensitivity is going to be an issue, then I suppose we should just toss all our tactical HUMINT assets down the shitter, because, as any field commander will tell you, tactical intelligence is time-sensitive by nature.

I-15 South.

Start driving and we'll figure it out.

Chuck, Arthur... Any of y'all down for some grub tonight?

Let's see... it's 68F out here, and the the sun is beginning to set over the bay...

Me? I'd rather play with my transFORMERs in the yard behind my HOUSE, but given my standing alone amongst the MAJORITY drinking crowd here, I suppose I'm relegated to being the LEADER of my ragtag crew of nobody.

Last Cry/Sexual Predator

He/she didn't enter anything on their profile...

WOOOOOOOOOOOSSSSSSSSSSHHHHHHHHHHH!

You've got some training to do then, young man. Thanatos340? Hook this brotha up!

Doh! I can't believe it took me this long to figure out... ANGIE EVERHART. Duh! Haven't seen her at Perris since, oh, maybe '01, but she's got the best female skydiver boobies I've seen, hands fucking down. See attached.

Dude, This thread's really got me thinking. I mean, I've seen dozens of skydiver boobies in my time -- some big, some small, some natural, some fake -- and I'm sincerely having trouble picking out a clear winner from memory. Perhaps I need a refresher.

Was that a compliment?