JoeWeber

When you're down to hopefully you're down to the quality of your defense lawyers. Don't anyone for a second believe there isn't wiggle room in this.

In court that would be a nifty piece of evidence showing intent; that's the tricky bit to prove.

Thank you for your service but I doubt it. 4 years of disrupting every norm concerning presidential records, not the least of which was tearing them up and tossing them on the floor or flushing them down the crapper, will give anyone an excellent excuse for doing what to them was normal. Even Trump might be able to claim innocence: What? Seriously? No one ever told me no or to stop it or else! If you need to blame anyone blame my advisors! And it might just work.

And I hope you get every year plus some. Unfortunately, I'm pretty sure that an entire Brentocene and more won't be long enough to prove out your theories.

Garland is not screwing around. DOJ filed today to keep the supporting affidavit under wraps. The filing won't read well to Trump or his lawyers. doj-filing.pdf

We have common ground. I think we should never have put large forces on the ground. Special Forces, absolutely. Air power, absolutely. Western nations spent 3300 lives, wrecked many more, and wasted $2 Trillion dollars on a nation whose president skied out before the end with a pallet of cash and an army that surrendered before being asked. Thank Bush before you blame Biden.

While we were there 2300 American soldiers were killed, was that outrageous? There are posters here who will drone you to death if you aren't careful; I have no problem with the government doing the same to terrorists who are known to have killed Americans, or anyone else for that matter. You'll see no outrage from me. In my view we should never have entered Afghanistan or Iraq. Better to have maintained or expanded the no-fly zones and when required kill those who need it from above.

Welcome aboard, you'll do well here.

He's not. He simply whacked an asshole. We need more of that.

Is it actually free for professors emeritus or did someone pay for the system and comp you because you're so lovable.

When certain states pass their fetal personhood laws will sex with a pregnant women be prosecutable as child abuse? Maybe we'll get to sue guy's who have sex if they're guilty, knowingly or not. Surely probable cause is enough, I'm thinking.

Sure. That's a 2' X 3' size, way too large to prove anything, which is the point I was making. But it's on a human silhouette, as attached, correct? That is also a part of the unfortunate, subconscious altering, narrative that supports needing a pistol for personal protection. I know that automatic weapons are often mistakenly referred to, in the vernacular, as machine guns. I'll point out it's the same as calling high capacity magazines "hi cap mag's" if you're in the mood for exactness.

Something new? You're already world famous in denier and contrarian circles, maybe look for something that shows a bit of commonality with your fellow man to show you aren't a troll but just a big teddy bear.

We've heard it all, and then some. Cover some new ground. It's fun.

You might not have noticed down at the gas station while you were pumping premium but other things have been happening in the world. For giggles, why not this time set the tone arm in it's rack and change the record?

What about those of us, unlike you and Elon who are hell bent on overpopulating the world with solar customers, who don't have kids to make EV's work? Will we get subsidies or maybe Kid Kredits?

You’re back! I was thinking Colonel Klink has tossed you back in the cooler. While it’s never too early to troll it is still a little early for hurricanes. But did you notice that early named storm that went through the ABC’s?

New glob of spaghetti sliding down the wall: the documents were protected by attorney client privilege and must forthwith be returned. TRUTH!

Yes. As you'll no doubt recall that roused my ire in particular to the point where I felt personal confrontation was required. Of course, sometime later I was forced admit my error and concede the point, just to get that out of the way. So which thread should we use?

Next up: no ones been treated worse since I was cut from the 400 way!

You're a goddamn genius, Gump! Of course it must be from the time of the constitution. You can bet your corn cob pipe that the Supreme Court would rule that way. "Sorry there, Billy Bob, but that one went straight through that fellers fat apron and they didn't have them in 1776. No Machine Gun license for you!"

I need some help here. Armed Trump supporters are outside the Phoenix FBI office protesting. They're saying: "We're here in support of Trump, for what happened to him, the unlawful search with the FBI at his Mar-a-Lago home," "We are sick and tired of this tyrannical government called the Biden regime. We will not stand by and we will not stand down. "We're gonna take the fight to the FBI if need be." Is this the correct thread or should this information be in the Second Amendment thread? What about the President Potty thread or the FBI Excuses thread? Perhaps we should just combine them all and start a Future of America Thread in Bonfire.

A full size silhouette? Of a human being? Where do the rounds need to hit to count?

Methinks they protest too much.

I sort of like this angle from Trumps office: "President Trump, in order to prepare for work the next day, often took documents, including classified documents, from the Oval Office to the residence. He had a standing order that documents removed from the Oval Office and taken into the residence were deemed to be declassified the moment he removed them," the statement said. Just an innocent example of doing homework, you know, like everyone continues to do after they were fired. And besides, we had a swell sign on the exit door reading all documents leaving here are now declassified.