agentsmith413 0 #1 September 11, 2010 can anyone recommend some video editing software for editing skydiving videos for a beginner? i would like to learn to edit videos and eventually edit the tandem videos in the future(assuming im good enough). im looking for something versatile but somewhat easy to pick up. any suggestions would be appreciated. EDIT: and before anyone asks. i am NOT shooting video im just looking to learn to edit.Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside, all used up, and loudly proclaiming: Wow, what a ride! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 3 #2 September 11, 2010 Quotecan anyone recommend some video editing software for editing skydiving videos for a beginner? i would like to learn to edit videos and eventually edit the tandem videos in the future(assuming im good enough). im looking for something versatile but somewhat easy to pick up. any suggestions would be appreciated. EDIT: and before anyone asks. i am NOT shooting video im just looking to learn to edit. What kind of computer do you have?quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
agentsmith413 0 #3 September 11, 2010 nothing extravagant but it should be able to handle basic video editing software.. i also was told to have it compatible with avchd(not sure if thats what its called) format its a sony vaio the specs are as follows... intel core i3 cpu@ 2.27ghz 4GB ddr3 ram nvidia geforce 310m 500GB hddLife is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside, all used up, and loudly proclaiming: Wow, what a ride! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DSE 3 #4 September 11, 2010 2GB per core is a good plan... That machine is on the light side for heavy AVCHD processing, but it'll do you JUST fine for one-stream, maybe dual stream edits Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
agentsmith413 0 #5 September 11, 2010 ok well with that being said what would be a good program to learn on?Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside, all used up, and loudly proclaiming: Wow, what a ride! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DSE 3 #6 September 12, 2010 A search or sticky read would answer this Vegas Premiere Canopus would all be good PC picks I'm a fan of Vegas by far, and Premiere a distant second. Vegas Movie Studio 10 is a great place to start if you don't need automation Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Icon134 0 #7 September 12, 2010 I'll second Vegas... its a very good editing platform and easy to learn on...Livin' on the Edge... sleeping with my rigger's wife... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Coreece 190 #8 September 12, 2010 Quoteim looking for something versatile but somewhat easy to pick up. Nothing's easy in this business...just persevere and you'll find it. Vegas is probably the easiest, but Premiere/Adobe Creative Suite will force you to know what you're doing, and will ultimatly make things easier on you when that time comes.Your secrets are the true reflection of who you really are... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DSE 3 #9 September 12, 2010 Quotebut Premiere/Adobe Creative Suite will force you to know what you're doing, and will ultimatly make things easier on you when that time comes. Elaborate, please? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
agentsmith413 0 #10 September 12, 2010 thanks for the info guys i appreciate itLife is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside, all used up, and loudly proclaiming: Wow, what a ride! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ronaldo 0 #11 September 13, 2010 Check the Pinnacle Studio, it is really easy to use and has some really nice features and effects. I learned to use it by myself.Engineering Law #5: The most vital dimension on any plan drawing stands the most chance of being omitted Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FreeflyChile 0 #12 September 13, 2010 DSE, I was looking at Vegas the other day on the Sony site, and one thing I really want to do is to do some basic stop-motion animation and rotoscoping stuff. Which one (if any or all) allow for dropping still frames into a timeline for the purposes of animation? Would any of these allow for the dropping of photo files into a timeline and then converting the whole thing into a video clip of varying definitions? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mircan 0 #13 September 13, 2010 QuoteThat machine is on the light side for heavy AVCHD processing, but it'll do you JUST fine for one-stream, maybe dual stream edits I`m totally clueless about what you refer here. What is considered heavy processing? What do you mean by one stream/dual stream? Please?dudeist skydiver #42 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PhreeZone 15 #14 September 13, 2010 Vegas will let you run more then one session at a time concurrently. Think about it this way, most times to edit two videos at the same time needs two computers, Vegas can run multiple copies of itself at the same time and then can edit and render multiple at the same time too. If you want to render 4-5 videos at the same time you need a MUCH higher computer these these. If you just want to edit one at a time then its fine.Yesterday is history And tomorrow is a mystery Parachutemanuals.com Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mircan 0 #15 September 13, 2010 Ooooh... He ment parallel instances of program... Still, in which category would standard tandem video go to? Dozen crossfades, couple of titles, two audio tracks, one instance of program... Light? I`m trying to build HD editing PC around Intel`s i3 CPU (4GB DDR3 RAM). Still, I`m not sure if it could handle vanilla tandem video edit smoothly and in reasonable amount of time. dudeist skydiver #42 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Coreece 190 #16 September 13, 2010 QuoteQuotebut Premiere/Adobe Creative Suite will force you to know what you're doing, and will ultimatly make things easier on you when that time comes. Elaborate, please? I don't want to get into the old debate of which system is better and start listing all the pro/cons of each because at the end of the day I'm sure we'll both agree that when it comes to basic editing it's all subjective. It's not until you get into color grading, compositing, motion graphics and SPX that you start to realize the shortcommings of inferior software like Vegas. Now, I'm not knocking Vegas at all, I think it's a wonderful system and every editor should have a copy on hand no matter what system you prefer. Vegas is hands down the best value when it comes to editing and actually performs better in some cases, like when a newbie is editing HD on a weak computer that still uses Vista, for example. I think it all comes down to how far you want to take your video career...if you want to go pro, I think it'd be best to just jump right into Adobe CS or Final cut Studio....if you can. Furthermore, Dynamic link is an awesome tool that simply just makes things easier in the long run.Your secrets are the true reflection of who you really are... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PharmerPhil 0 #17 September 13, 2010 QuoteStill, in which category would standard tandem video go to? Dozen crossfades, couple of titles, two audio tracks, one instance of program... Light? Audio shouldn't be a problem with anything that can handle decent video editing, but scrapping the cross-fades will speed things up. Use simple cuts instead. If you don't think they are "professional" enough, then watch what the major networks do when they edit. 90 percent of their transitions (or more) are simple cuts. (Although I'll admit NFL broadcasts are using some pretty creative transitions these days between plays.) Also, if you aren't delivering (or planning on delivering) your videos in HD, shooting and editing in SD should speed things up considerably and reduce the demands on your processor. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mircan 0 #18 September 13, 2010 SD edits are no problem, of course. We always use simple cross-disolve or "dip-to-white" transitions. I have a project that is going to be in HD and I want to build and buy a PC for it (and for the latter work). Simply put: Is i3 CPU capable to do smooth scrubbing of timeline on simple cross-disolve transitions with AVCHD video? In Premiere CS4 or Vegas.dudeist skydiver #42 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PhreeZone 15 #19 September 13, 2010 i3 will do it with out an issue. I'm running an much older core system and I can do the edits, its all down to how fast it will do it. you'll be happy with an i3 until you try something faster. Overall.. spend what you can and ignore the newer systems. Yesterday is history And tomorrow is a mystery Parachutemanuals.com Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dragon2 0 #20 September 13, 2010 It depends more on the speed you want to have the finished dvd. I'm using a core i7/12 gb ram/ssd pc and do not like to edit on my quadcore 4gb laptop (even though the laptop is slightly more expensive...), because I need to have the finished dvd within 20 minutes (and be packed, have the photo cd ready, have done the interview with the next pax). So, the faster the better. However if your dz ships the dvds within a few days, a core i3 laptop will do just fine. But if speed really matters, better get a core i7 pc. ciel bleu, Saskia Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mircan 0 #21 September 13, 2010 The "speed" would be "working speed", with rendering time as second. I`ll go with i3, especially b/c I got a deal to change the CPU to stronger one if this appears to be inadequate. Thank you very much guys/girls! Quite informative.dudeist skydiver #42 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AndyMan 7 #22 September 13, 2010 Is anyone using the free stuff? Is Microsoft Movie Maker really that painful? Any other free suggestion for PC? _Am__ You put the fun in "funnel" - craichead. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FreeflyChile 0 #23 September 13, 2010 I used movie maker for some really basic stuff for my own old videos - but I don't know about HD stuff or anything like that. Certainly not for anything fancy. One thing I noticed that is different (maybe I just didn't figure it out yet) in the Windows 7 movie maker is that you can't insert a photo or still frame into a video clip. It used to be you could just drop a picture in there no problem. For some reason, it wasn't letting me do it when I wanted to the other day. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rover 9 #24 November 2, 2012 Looking for information - hence bumping this thread - have there been any new developments in this area?2 wrongs don't make a right - but 3 lefts do. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites