0
ralu

Students jumping with / without altimeter

Recommended Posts

In finland everyone (licensed or not) have to wear a visual altimeter on every jump.
I think that students need to wear one, even if it's a s/l jump, they need it under canopy too, when they are planning the landing pattern, not only in freefall. It's hard to judge altitude under canopy when you have a couple of jumps.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


In finland everyone (licensed or not) have to wear a visual altimeter on every jump.
I think that students need to wear one, even if it's a s/l jump, they need it under canopy too, when they are planning the landing pattern, not only in freefall. It's hard to judge altitude under canopy when you have a couple of jumps.



The same in Australia. It used to be that you could not wear an alti on on jumps shorter then 10 sec but not anymore i don't think.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Always have to wear one. I'm thinking of the canopy ride as well as the freefall.



I see your point, but what do you think about this situation: at one exit, 3 jumpers got out. The first one was an experienced skydiver followed by the students ( at that jump without altimeters). The students knew that they must follow the first. All landed perfectly safe in the target area.

:)

what would be a woman without her dreams....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

In finland everyone (licensed or not) have to wear a visual altimeter on every jump.
I think that students need to wear one, even if it's a s/l jump, they need it under canopy too, when they are planning the landing pattern, not only in freefall. It's hard to judge altitude under canopy when you have a couple of jumps.



In Denmark,students use visual alti,licened can chouse between visual or audiable(or use them both)
Licened jumpers that are planing a jump whith less than 10 sek of freefall and to land in water can jump whith out any alti at all.

Personaly i use my visual and my loved Pro-Track,just cant see why i shouldnt

Stay safe
Stefan Faber

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

The students knew that they must follow the first



Why would they do that?
Normaly do experienced(licened jumpers in this case)have different kind of cannopies.I usaly spin my crossfire 99 down before i do a 180hook(only if there are space to all this fun),a student in a 200+sqft canopi will hang up there while im staring to pack my chute..If he would follow my fligth he probaly will get hurt,while a hook looks way lower from above than from the ground..I belive that studentes (atleast total newbies)should make an aproch like a U and cut of 300ft each side of it(rughly)

Stay safe
Stefan Faber

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

In finland everyone (licensed or not) have to wear a visual altimeter on every jump

Quote

The same in Australia.


The Netherlands too...



Peter, do we have to wear one for a (planned) water jump?
The BVR says nothing about that I believe, so the answer would be, Yes?

ciel bleu,
Saskia

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

The Netherlands too...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Peter, do we have to wear one for a (planned) water jump?



Hi Saskia,

I don't want to hijack the thread into "merits and shortcomings of the dutch basic safety regulations" (the BVR) but uh... yes we have to.

Makes you wonder if everybody always requests an exemption (par. 703 BVR) - " They Are Violating The BSR's - Somebody Spank Em!!!"
B|

"Whoever in discussion adduces authority uses not intellect but memory." - Leonardo da Vinci
A thousand words...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Two comments:
First wearing an altimeter on a water jump is very expensive. Every time you dip an altimeter in water, it has to go back to the factory for overhaul. Consequently, few people do more than 10 second delays on water jumps.

Secondly, "follow the leader" is a great way to teach landing patterns. It helps if the "leader" is jumping a similar canopy. Even with first-time tandem students, I tell them "we are going to follow the green tandem for landing."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

First wearing an altimeter on a water jump is very expensive



Well, uh... we don't do that either, taking our altimeters for a swim - but Saskia asked me if we were obliged to, under our equivalent of the BSR. So I checked and apparently we are...
(everybody knows BSR to be an acronym for 'BullShitRules', isn't it? :)
Quote

Secondly, "follow the leader" is a great way to teach landing patterns.



I do that also, with my tandempassengers - makes great conversation. Teaching it to the static-line students however has the built in problem that when jumper A looks down on jumper B from 1500ft upwind it might seem as if A is at 500ft on a certain spot downwind while in fact he is much more upwind than it appears for the untrained eye. In fact for students to locate another canopy at a certain place and altitude (assuming the other canopy didn't land already) is almost impossible. When you 'follow the other tandem' it is a whole different balgame, with - if I might ad - you overseeing the student and correcting him if necessary. On your typical Cessna 182 static line operation you have students land at 45-60 sec intervals. You on the tandem left at the same run as the other tandem and created some vertical separation during the descent - just enough not to get in eachothers way and for the catchers to help tandem 1 and then dash for tandem 2, usually...

Assigning 'an experienced jumper to lead' to every static line student is simply impractical, static line students following eachother is something I always try to discourage - using strong words if necessary...>:(:S>:(:S

"Whoever in discussion adduces authority uses not intellect but memory." - Leonardo da Vinci
A thousand words...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Every student should wear a visual altimeter until they at least get off AFF. At some later time, they might want to consider doing one jump without one to get used to judging altitude without an altimeter.



------------------------------------------------------------

I'm from a small DZ in Canada. Here first jumps are
made with no alti. (IAD)
Reason: Chest mounts present a danger to chest
area on bad face plant landings. wrist/hand mounts
can get entangled in opening parachutes or impair
use of emergency handles. Extra time would have to
be spent teaching proper alti use.
from first jump on ...we learn to count" develop time
sense"and make visual references" eyeballing ".
This is easy stuff to teach. alti use comes later"freefall more than 10sec".
So no student can take up instrument flight until
they prove themselves competent at VFR. That includes canopy control.
What some call head down we call feet up!
mike.
-----------------------------------
Mike Wheadon B-3715,HEMP#1
Higher Expectations for Modern Parachutists.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If I want to practice my ability to recognize altitude visually, I just won't look at my altimeter. I'll still wear it in case I am completely uncertain and have a moment of panic though.


"Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain and most fools do." Ben Franklin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0