0
wan2doit

USS Fitzgerald - accident or Intentional

Recommended Posts

Sunday's network talking heads mention the US ship hit the container ship BUT the track of the ships shown on main networks clearly illustrate the container ship made almost a complete U-Turn (145 +- degrees counter clockwise) after nearly missing the aft of the US ship on the 1st pass to come back and eventually ramming and nearly sinking the USS Fitzgerald during a 2nd pass.

Maybe someone here can explain how this could possibly be an accident.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Can somebody explain to me how a container ship out maneuvers a destroyer to ram it?

Container ships do NOT turn on a dime and the ACX Crystal is roughly five times more massive than the Fitz. It would have taken the container ship maybe 15 minutes to a half hour to make a turn such as described.

Regardless of any conspiracy theories, this was almost certainly avoidable by the Fitz, if only it had.
quade -
The World's Most Boring Skydiver

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
at least 400 container ships traverse that corridor every day. I'm not going to speculate on how and why it happened, but it did happen at what, 2:20 AM or so? Wasn't somebody supposed to be manning the ship radar that sees other ships in close proximity? If yes, you'd think evasive maneuvers would have been ordered.

Some heads are gonna roll (not literally).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Not intentional.

If the vessel made a U-turn it's possible that they had removed the contact from the list of vessels they were tracking electronically since it had already gone by them.

There would have been someone standing watch on that starboard bridge wing just above the damage. He would've seen red/green on a constant bearing but not moving left or right all the way until collision. It's easy to say that he should've seen it but he also has radio chatter coming back through his ear as each watch updates their visual contacts while tracking literally an ocean of flashing and moving lights.

Navy salts I've talked to have also said that some vessels don't transmit their locations.
"I encourage all awesome dangerous behavior." - Jeffro Fincher

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
nolhtairt

at least 400 container ships traverse that corridor every day. I'm not going to speculate on how and why it happened, but it did happen at what, 2:20 AM or so? Wasn't somebody supposed to be manning the ship radar that sees other ships in close proximity? If yes, you'd think evasive maneuvers would have been ordered.

Some heads are gonna roll (not literally).



Not just ships radar, but also the venerable mark-1 eyeball on the forecastle, stern, port, and starboard.

The amount of failure which had to happen for this to occur is astounding.
quade -
The World's Most Boring Skydiver

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DJL

Navy salts I've talked to have also said that some vessels don't transmit their locations.



Regardless of whether the container ship was transmitting, the Fitz should have seen it coming in a couple of ways, AND shouldn't the Fitz ALWAYS be looking out for threats from small Zodiacs filled with explosives to generic navigational threats?
quade -
The World's Most Boring Skydiver

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Once is a indication that something is very wrong. This is not a bridge where a single sailor is tired after a long 12 hour watch.

Twice??? Some senior admirals who are overseeing command selection should be answering some questions. Serious career ending type questions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The Navy is always running into things. While on board the USS Constellation, we ran into a freighter in the IO. It always amazed me how we could be underway at night with how dark the flight deck would get with no lights and no moon, you couldn't see your hand in front of your face.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jclalor

The Navy is always running into things. While on board the USS Constellation, we ran into a freighter in the IO. It always amazed me how we could be underway at night with how dark the flight deck would get with no lights and no moon, you couldn't see your hand in front of your face.



When was this? I can find no record of the Connie having any significant collision.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Constellation_(CV-64)
http://www.popularmechanics.com/military/navy-ships/a27021/ship-collisions-us-navy-history/

Collisions do happen, but "always running into things" is, I think, an exaggeration.
quade -
The World's Most Boring Skydiver

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DJL

He would've seen red/green on a constant bearing but not moving left or right all the way until collision.



But that's an instant alarm to any private sailor, let alone a navy trained seaman.

Being able to see red and green without any aspect change means only one thing - Move and make yourself known any way you can.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
yoink

***He would've seen red/green on a constant bearing but not moving left or right all the way until collision.



But that's an instant alarm to any private sailor, let alone a navy trained seaman.

Being able to see red and green without any aspect change means only one thing - Move and make yourself known any way you can.

CBDR is very hard to distinguish in a harbor with a million lights on the shore-line. Add in some drowsy 20-year old watch-standers who think CIC and the bridge have a better eye on things and this isn't surprising.
"I encourage all awesome dangerous behavior." - Jeffro Fincher

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Commander Of Navy's 7th Fleet Dismissed After Series Of Ship Mishaps

"Adm. Scott Swift, commander of U.S. Pacific Fleet, today relieved the commander of Seventh Fleet, Vice Adm. Joseph Aucoin, due to a loss of confidence in his ability to command.

"Rear Adm. Phil Sawyer, who has already been nominated and confirmed for the position and promotion to Vice Adm., will assume command immediately."

Aucoin's removal follows four accidents involving Navy ships in the Pacific this year.
http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/08/23/545423389/commander-of-navys-7th-fleet-to-be-removed-after-collisions-reports-say

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0