0
hwt

Obama's Next Frontier for NASA

Recommended Posts

Quote

What are Muslims going to do for the Space program? set them back 2000 years?



The Arab world was literally instrumental in humans understanding of the positions of the stars in the skies. They understood quite a bit about the nature of the universe hundreds of years before western culture.

The Arab world, specifically Saudi Arabia, continues to be interested in astronomical positioning. I will admit they seem to be somewhat obsessed with the concept of time, but it's all related.

It would be tragic if we left them out of the discussion for any one of a number of reasons.

Regardless of what Bolden told the reporter in the interview, part of the reason for international cooperation is diplomatic . . . and I'm ok with that. Mankind as a whole should engage in exploration and saving itself from natural disasters. Let each country participate in whatever way they can. Maybe they know something we don't and maybe their efforts can spare us unnecessary duplication of efforts.
quade -
The World's Most Boring Skydiver

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

They understood quite a bit about the nature of the universe hundreds of years before western culture.



and I was thin in the mid eighties. Does that mean you want to follow my diet plan today.

I hate the diplomacy of inclusion. I think it is perfectly OK...no, it's preferable to try your best to be better than everyone else.
You are only as strong as the prey you devour

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

. . . it's preferable to try your best to be better than everyone else.



Try, sure, but what if the actual best just happens to be some other guy that knows something you don't that's vital to a mission?

I think a person would be foolish to just "try" without doing the research to find out if maybe there's something that could be learned from somebody else.

Does it make sense for a person to write a book without having somebody proofread it? Would you submit a scientific paper without having somebody else check your math? Would you have brain surgery performed without getting a second opinion?
quade -
The World's Most Boring Skydiver

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

it's preferable to try your best to be better than everyone else

And I think it's preferable to get the best result possible, even if that means it's not mine, or not mine alone.

Wendy P.
There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

reply]

With only two shuttle missions left, what else is NASA going to do?

Quote



Sad, isn't it? Alas, we give away our technology and then lay back to watch the Russians take the lead...again. Leadership we don't have anymore. That left with our last administrator AND President.



To add one point, Our tax dollars are paying for the Russians to take the lead.>:(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

The US will lose the ability to put man in space for the first time. It is a tragedy of national proportions that is not getting enough visibility.



Actually... we didn't have the ability to put man in space between 1975 and 1981.



True. However that was not really going to be the case. When Apollo 18,19 and 20 (that were scheduled to fly but didn't) were scrubbed, that stopped the wholesale layoffs and lengthened the fly interval.

That was just a handful of years after Apollo before Shuttle. We are now talking of what, a 15 year or more gap?

Obama is about to layoff over 5000 of your best and brightest. And during a piss poor economy to boot.



My intent was to point out that this crossroads situation has come up before in NASA's manned spaceflight history. The Apollo / Saturn programs had just demonstrated going to the moon, launching and getting to a space station in LEO, and successful international rendezvous and docking. And we abandoned that program.

Shuttle has demonstrated excellent up and down mass capability, the largest crew of any single space vehicle, the ability to perform on orbit servicing of satellites, and amazing logistics capabilities in assembling a very large modular space station. And we're abandoning that program. The shame in this, to me, is less about us relying on Soyuz/Dragon/CST-100/whatever to get to low earth orbit and more about the fact that ISS modules were sacked in the process.

I'm torn about constellation being cancelled. Yes there's some free drift going on right now, but I'm wondering how it would have fit as a third paragraph to this post.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

reply]

With only two shuttle missions left, what else is NASA going to do?

Quote



Sad, isn't it? Alas, we give away our technology and then lay back to watch the Russians take the lead...again. Leadership we don't have anymore. That left with our last administrator AND President.



To add one point, Our tax dollars are paying for the Russians to take the lead.>:(


What up Channing.......yes, we've paid the Russians for over 30 years. Why stop now I guess! lol


Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

>To add one point, Our tax dollars are paying for the Russians to take the lead.

And Russian tax dollars are being launched into our Space Station. Which is a good thing.



Ever read Walt Cunningham's book? He can definitely enlighten you on the Russian space program and our help we've given them over the years... It's sickening.

And a link to his recent discussion:

http://www.talkingspaceonline.com/home/episode-223-a-true-american-hero.html


Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>He can definitely enlighten you on the Russian space
>program and our help we've given them over the years... It's sickening.

And vice versa. The RD-180, the rocket engine on our Atlas missile, is a Russian design. And of course they are now ferrying all the personnel and supplies for the Space Station for us.

I don't see cooperation as a bad thing. Indeed, the country I worry most about in that arena is China - our relations with them are currently poorer and they have no stake in our space program, as we have in Russia's (and they in ours.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

And vice versa. The RD-180, the rocket engine on our Atlas missile, is a Russian design.



Sure, hell we bought the rights to the damn thing! Or some "contractors" did.

Besides, we've given wayyyy more than we've ever received. Look, we can argue that we stole technology from the Germans and made it better.

But in the end our program will slowly die under the hands of the current adminstration.


Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

>To add one point, Our tax dollars are paying for the Russians to take the lead.

And Russian tax dollars are being launched into our Space Station. Which is a good thing.



I'm pretty sure you meant the International Space Station that's a collective work between the US, Europe, Russia, Japan and Canada, since "our" space station, Skylab, was de-orbited in 1979...right?
Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>I'm pretty sure you meant the International Space Station that's a
>collective work between the US, Europe, Russia, Japan and Canada . . .

Definitely. But given the animosity towards cooperation on this thread, I figured I'd refer to it by its largest contributor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

>I'm pretty sure you meant the International Space Station that's a
>collective work between the US, Europe, Russia, Japan and Canada . . .

Definitely. But given the animosity towards cooperation on this thread, I figured I'd refer to it by its largest contributor.



Uh huh.....
Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

>To add one point, Our tax dollars are paying for the Russians to take the lead.

And Russian tax dollars are being launched into our Space Station. Which is a good thing.



Bill, we give the Russians millions and millions. So much damn corruption in their program, it's sickening. It's our own damned money that's getting them into space! ugh!


Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Bill, we give the Russians millions and millions. So much damn corruption in their program, it's sickening. It's our own damned money that's getting them into space! ugh!



There's corruption in every country. That's a weak argument.

If you want a good one, it would be that jobs and tax dollars go out of the country. By keeping the manufacture and launches in the US it would solve that problem.

Fortunately, that's precisely the direction NASA is heading by opening up space to US commercial ventures.
quade -
The World's Most Boring Skydiver

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

> It's our own damned money that's getting them into space!

And getting US into space. We are currently relying on them for transferring people and supplies to the ISS.



How did this thread start?

I give up on this thread.... Where are the believers? When I was young I watched us land on the moon. We had vision. We had esprit de corps. We were patriotic, fuck we believed in miracles! Now, everyone is all PC and have their heads stuck so far up the Presidents ass they can't see straight. Sadly, I and most of you reading this will probably not be around to see anybody land on an asteriod or Mars.

Peace..........


Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

When I was young I watched us land on the moon. We had vision. We had esprit de corps. We were patriotic, fuck we believed in miracles!



Another person that didn't quite understand what the space program was about.
quade -
The World's Most Boring Skydiver

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

To add one point, Our tax dollars are paying for the Russians to take the lead.>:(



Stepping back to this post, for just a minute, in what way do you feel the Russians are "taking the lead" in manned space flight?

Does the US throwing them a few bucks to keep them building Soyuz, Progress, and DOS modules (which they've been doing in a largely unchanged fashion for 40 years) because it's convenient for our budget really constitute them "taking the lead"?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

When I was young I watched us land on the moon. We had vision. We had esprit de corps. We were patriotic, fuck we believed in miracles!



Another person that didn't quite understand what the space program was about.



Get fucking real...... Tell ya what, tomorrow morning when I step into work, I'll ask two of America's finest astronauts what their views are of the current space program and how they felt as children about NASA when we landed on the moon. Bet you a 100 to 1, it'll be more a resemblance of my take on it versus yours........


Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

When I was young I watched us land on the moon. We had vision. We had esprit de corps. We were patriotic, fuck we believed in miracles!



Another person that didn't quite understand what the space program was about.



Get fucking real...... Tell ya what, tomorrow morning when I step into work, I'll ask two of America's finest astronauts what their views are of the current space program and how they felt as children about NASA when we landed on the moon. Bet you a 100 to 1, it'll be more a resemblance of my take on it versus yours........



Awesome, then find a historian and ask him about what Sputnik did for the US space program and why Kennedy said we were going to the Moon.

Space exploration was the sizzle that sold the program to the public, but the entire endeavor was a reaction to intercontinental nuclear capabilities. That is the reason we went into space.
quade -
The World's Most Boring Skydiver

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0