Liberal judge soft on Child Porn

[DJL 232]

Quote

Quote

So...what would Jesus do?

Obviously, you know enough Scripture to answer that question yourself.

At this point in time, that is post resurrection, the only question Jesus could pose to the woman in your example is, "Why should I let you come into my Heaven?"

However, I do believe that my first response, to pray for America, was also a correct one.

So basically, you're OK with Jesus being a Liberal and not allowing justice to take place? How can you live with this?

"I encourage all awesome dangerous behavior." - Jeffro Fincher

[Amazon 7]

Quote

Quote

Defiant Judge Takes On Child Pornography Law

Judge Weinstein, who sits in the United States District Court in Brooklyn, has twice thrown out convictions that would have ensured that the man spend at least five years behind bars. He has pledged to break protocol and inform the next jury about the mandatory prison sentence that the charges carry. And he recently declared that the man, who is awaiting a new trial, did not need an electronic ankle bracelet because he posed “no risk to society.”

The man he has spent three years trying to save from a long incarceration is Pietro Polizzi, a married father of five who collected more than 5,000 graphic pictures of children.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/22/nyregion/22judge.html?pagewanted=1

5,000 pictures?

Do you think that a conservative judge would be harder on child pornography??

[billvon 2,450]

>Liberal is a philosophy not a political party.

So is "conservative". And all in all the two philosophies have about the same level of morality/immorality, good/evil and sacrifice/hedonism. The difference is that conservatives tend to condemn their own particular vice/fetish/alternative orientation while simultaneously performing it.

[RonD1120 58]

Quote

Quote

Quote

So...what would Jesus do?

Obviously, you know enough Scripture to answer that question yourself.

At this point in time, that is post resurrection, the only question Jesus could pose to the woman in your example is, "Why should I let you come into my Heaven?"

However, I do believe that my first response, to pray for America, was also a correct one.

So basically, you're OK with Jesus being a Liberal and not allowing justice to take place? How can you live with this?

I have totally lost the track of this thread. I don't know what you or billvon are talking about.

I going to ride my motorcycle for a while.

Look for the shiny things of God revealed by the Holy Spirit. They only last for an instant but it is a Holy Instant. Let your soul absorb them.

[kallend 1,659]

Quote

I going to ride my motorcycle for a while.

Watch out for loonies in cars who will try to kill you,

...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

[RackJR 0]

Quote

I have totally lost the track of this thread. I don't know what you or billvon are talking about.

And completely avoided the questions you don't want to answer. I guess you can't help being slippery. Probably stems from the book you cling to.

Say what you mean. Do what you say.

[DJL 232]

Quote

I have totally lost the track of this thread. I don't know what you or billvon are talking about.

By your own definition Jesus was a Liberal who would not allow punishment to be dealt out my others. He preached forgiveness and repentance. Yet here's a judge who went soft on someone and you think this philosophy is destroying the American way of life. Is that an accurate summary?

"I encourage all awesome dangerous behavior." - Jeffro Fincher

[RonD1120 58]

Quote

Quote

I going to ride my motorcycle for a while.

Watch out for loonies in cars who will try to kill you,

Thank you for your expression of concern. It touched my soul.

Look for the shiny things of God revealed by the Holy Spirit. They only last for an instant but it is a Holy Instant. Let your soul absorb them.

[RonD1120 58]

Quote

Quote

I have totally lost the track of this thread. I don't know what you or billvon are talking about.

And completely avoided the questions you don't want to answer. I guess you can't help being slippery. Probably stems from the book you cling to.

Cling to the Holy Bible, you are absolutely correct. For the past 29 years it is the only thing that makes sense.

Somewhere around the late summer or early fall of 2009, I learned that many responses to my postings are nothing more than bait from the minds of adolescent rebels. They attempt to suck me down a rabbit hole of argument through twists and turns of minutia. Homey decided not to play that s**t.

To categorize my strategy as slippery is not correct. To be slippery is to be deliberately misleading for personal gain.

As mnealtx accurately noted once, I can be snarky when I am being attacked. However, be assured I do not start with the desire to be anything other than Christ's messenger.

Matthew 7:6
" Do not give what is holy to dogs, and do not throw your pearls before swine, or they will trample them under their feet, and turn and tear you to pieces.

Look for the shiny things of God revealed by the Holy Spirit. They only last for an instant but it is a Holy Instant. Let your soul absorb them.

[RonD1120 58]

Quote

By your own definition Jesus was a Liberal who would not allow punishment to be dealt out my others. He preached forgiveness and repentance. Yet here's a judge who went soft on someone and you think this philosophy is destroying the American way of life. Is that an accurate summary?

If I have given you the impression that Jesus was a Liberal I am sorry. He was not or is not, in the sense of the term in this age.

Let me explain. Jesus came to earth for one reason only and that was to be the propitiation of all sin through His atoning death.

During Jesus' two year ministry He taught forgiveness of sin through faith. Forgiveness of sin means the slate is wiped clean for past behaviors. Forgiveness does not mean that the behavior may be continued without penalty.

Jesus told his followers that their faith had healed them and/or their sins were forgiven and "Go and sin no more."

In today's ideology, Liberalism represents license to continue the sinful behavior. Liberalism demands that the parameters of sexual perversion be constantly expanded.

In my opinion, a judge that provides slack judgment for a pedophile is attempting the expand the acceptance of perversion.

Look for the shiny things of God revealed by the Holy Spirit. They only last for an instant but it is a Holy Instant. Let your soul absorb them.

[RonD1120 58]

Quote

>Liberal is a philosophy not a political party.

So is "conservative". And all in all the two philosophies have about the same level of morality/immorality, good/evil and sacrifice/hedonism. The difference is that conservatives tend to condemn their own particular vice/fetish/alternative orientation while simultaneously performing it.

This morning I made sense of your statement. I agree with you.

Look for the shiny things of God revealed by the Holy Spirit. They only last for an instant but it is a Holy Instant. Let your soul absorb them.

[Andy9o8 0]

Quote

Liberalism demands that the parameters of sexual perversion be constantly expanded.

That's one of the more creative gratuitous liberal-bashes I've read on here in at least 2 or 3 days.

[Amazon 7]

Quote

Quote

Liberalism demands that the parameters of sexual perversion be constantly expanded.

That's one of the more creative gratuitous liberal-bashes I've read on here in at least 2 or 3 days.

I have observed over the years that after libralism defines it for them... the conservatives jump into the expanded perversion sexual pool to try out the deeper water with glee.

[turtlespeed 212]

Quote

Quote

Liberalism demands that the parameters of sexual perversion be constantly expanded.

That's one of the more creative gratuitous liberal-bashes I've read on here in at least 2 or 3 days.

And you think it untrue?

I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

[champu 1]

Quote

>Liberal is a philosophy not a political party.

So is "conservative"

Whenever I'm in a diner and see someone use two things of jam on one slice of toast I think, "What a liberal use of jam! That person probably supports banning guns and a 100% marginal tax rate to create more welfare programs." But if they split a thing of jam across two slices of toast I think, "What conservative jam application! I'll bet they're pro-life, hate the gays, and want creationism taught in science class."

[DARK 0]

Quote

In today's ideology, Liberalism represents license to continue the sinful behavior. Liberalism demands that the parameters of sexual perversion be constantly expanded.

let me just get this straight

you are comparing paedophilia with homosexuality and you are saying liberals are pro paedophilia?

[RonD1120 58]

Quote

Quote

In today's ideology, Liberalism represents license to continue the sinful behavior. Liberalism demands that the parameters of sexual perversion be constantly expanded.

let me just get this straight

you are comparing paedophilia with homosexuality and you are saying liberals are pro paedophilia?

Ah, the rabbit hole.

No, I am not comparing pedophilia with homosexuality. However, they both fall under the concept of sexual perversion as they are both examples of individuals unable to express normal sexual desires.

Liberalism, as an ideological concept, will always seek to expand, accept and redefine previously aberrant behavior into the realm of normal. Conceptually, liberalism seeks to restrict Christian or conservative ideology. It is the Yin and Yang of social order.

Look for the shiny things of God revealed by the Holy Spirit. They only last for an instant but it is a Holy Instant. Let your soul absorb them.

[DARK 0]

Quote

Liberalism, as an ideological concept, will always seek to expand, accept and redefine previously aberrant behavior into the realm of normal.

so do you think liberals are pro paedophilia or not?

***Conceptually, liberalism seeks to restrict Christian or conservative ideology.

[RonD1120 58]

Homey not going to play. Have a good weekend Rabbit.

Look for the shiny things of God revealed by the Holy Spirit. They only last for an instant but it is a Holy Instant. Let your soul absorb them.

[Andy9o8 0]

Quote

Quote

Quote

Liberalism demands that the parameters of sexual perversion be constantly expanded.

That's one of the more creative gratuitous liberal-bashes I've read on here in at least 2 or 3 days.

And you think it untrue?

Homey not going to play.
Here's your turtle-hole.

[DARK 0]

Quote

Homey not going to play. Have a good weekend Rabbit.

why do you post in a debate orientated forum if your not willing to debate?

also we can do without the patronising thanks hun

[billvon 2,450]

>Liberalism, as an ideological concept, will always seek to expand,
>accept and redefine previously aberrant behavior into the realm of normal.

True to a degree. Liberalism ended slavery, and redefined blacks as normal people, with the same rights as everyone else. Liberalism got women the vote, and redefined them as normal, thinking, responsible humans. Liberalism ended the laws against interracial marriages, and allowed what was previously considered aberrant behavior into the realm of normal. Liberalism is now ending laws outlawing homosexuality, and will continue until gays have the same rights as anyone else.

I am sure there are uber-conservatives people who pine for the olden days when blacks were property, women were little better, gays could be arrested and any black man who touched a white woman would be arrested at best - but more likely lynched. Fortunately they are greatly in the minority. Even people who identify themselves as 'normal' conservatives scoff at the idea of outlawing interracial marriage, and become insulted if anyone suggests that they would oppose that formerly radical-liberal concept.

Some day in the future, someone just like you will be condemning the next class of perversion. Call it virtual sex. And that person will make a statement like "well, of course I support interracial and gay marriage; don't insult me by suggesting I'm a bigot! But virtual sex is aberrant behavior; these people have behavioral problems expressing normal sex."

And conservatives will once again follow behind the paths that liberals blazed, as they have done historically.

[RonD1120 58]

Quote

Quote

Homey not going to play. Have a good weekend Rabbit.

why do you post in a debate orientated forum if your not willing to debate?

also we can do without the patronising thanks hun

Sorry, I couldn't resist.

Go back and read all my posts in this thread. I thought I stated my position clearly.

Look for the shiny things of God revealed by the Holy Spirit. They only last for an instant but it is a Holy Instant. Let your soul absorb them.

[Shotgun 1]

Quote

Conceptually, liberalism seeks to restrict Christian or conservative ideology.

Just curious... Do you think that most Christians and/or conservatives would like to see the sodomy laws reinstated? And would you like to see them reinstated?

Personally, I don't want to restrict you from living your life the way you want to, as long as you are not harming someone else. But if your ideology seeks to keep me (or anyone else) from having that same freedom, then yes, I would want to restrict it.

[RonD1120 58]

Quote

>Liberalism, as an ideological concept, will always seek to expand,
>accept and redefine previously aberrant behavior into the realm of normal.

True to a degree. Liberalism ended slavery, and redefined blacks as normal people, with the same rights as everyone else. Liberalism got women the vote, and redefined them as normal, thinking, responsible humans. Liberalism ended the laws against interracial marriages, and allowed what was previously considered aberrant behavior into the realm of normal. Liberalism is now ending laws outlawing homosexuality, and will continue until gays have the same rights as anyone else.

I am sure there are uber-conservatives people who pine for the olden days when blacks were property, women were little better, gays could be arrested and any black man who touched a white woman would be arrested at best - but more likely lynched. Fortunately they are greatly in the minority. Even people who identify themselves as 'normal' conservatives scoff at the idea of outlawing interracial marriage, and become insulted if anyone suggests that they would oppose that formerly radical-liberal concept.

Some day in the future, someone just like you will be condemning the next class of perversion. Call it virtual sex. And that person will make a statement like "well, of course I support interracial and gay marriage; don't insult me by suggesting I'm a bigot! But virtual sex is aberrant behavior; these people have behavioral problems expressing normal sex."

And conservatives will once again follow behind the paths that liberals blazed, as they have done historically.

I never thought of Liberalism as the catalyst to end slavery. For me it was Christian morality that spurred freedom to the blacks. It was simply right and good and that comes from God's love and His Word.

Remember, around the beginning of the 20th Century, Liberalism morphed into Progressivism. It is that social concept that is the evil of the day.

It is the Yin and Yang, the energy of opposites that helps to generate the creativity of society. I have my chosen side as do you.

Most folks here have a difficult time separating my Christian values from my social science understanding. I think you do an admirable job picking apart the pieces.

For the record here, the primary definition of Conservative for me is, less government. I realize there is more to the concept but that is how I tend to use the term.

Look for the shiny things of God revealed by the Holy Spirit. They only last for an instant but it is a Holy Instant. Let your soul absorb them.