0
billvon

Texas "fact-optional" science education bill

Recommended Posts

Quote

I appreciate your substantive stance.



Ptolemy's equant was no more proof of his theory than a tree is proof of the theory that goddidit. I would have expected that a lawyer would know what constitutes proof and what doesn't. Assuming you do know the difference, then the only alternative is that you must be willfully misrepresenting the facts. That may be an acceptable (yet dishonerable) trait for a lawyer, it is not acceptable in science.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Physicists are considering reworking our theories of gravity so that they dony need to invoke dark matter.
You should look up scalar tensor vector gravity . The problem is these alternative theories have to prove themselves before one cannot do away with dark matter as the explantion for the rotation of galaxies.
You do physics a disservice to think they are so naieve as to have not thought of this .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm pretty sure that phycisists have thought of these things. We don't hear much about it for good reason - they are new theories without proof.

As an aside, I've looked more into my Big Bang criticisms and have shot my ideas way full of holes.

It's pretty convincing...


My wife is hotter than your wife.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0