0
kallend

Do you startle easily?

Recommended Posts

I believe that it has been sidetracked by the distortion of the definition of "liberal" & "conservative".


Never mind left vs. right: I believe that statists are more fearful, and the brave are more willing to take the risk of "too much" freedom.
Speed Racer
--------------------------------------------------

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
As a matter of fact, I do startle easi ... AAAAGHH!! .... ..... easily. (Sorry - the cat walked in.) And everyone knows what a rightie Fascist I am.

Maybe it's a false correlation. When ice cream sales go up, so does the rate of violent crime. Ergo ice cream causes violent crime. And everyone knows that the dude in the pickup truck can be counted on to speed and never use his turn signal. He's also pretty likely to smoke. So obviously smoking causes vehicular fucktardedness. And so it goes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I really wanted to post a witty reply but I'm side-tracked thinking about what a cool, totally descriptive word "startle" is.

That and the mental image of Wile E Coyote about to make a Wile E Coyote shaped crater in something.
Owned by Remi #?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

fucktardedness



Andy:

Know thy audience, my learned friend. Most people are not comfortable around legalese. You are clearly an attorney of the old breed. Nowadays, young attorneys are trained to avoid such antiquated terminology, though we are familiar with it.


My wife is hotter than your wife.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The study seems to commit a classic logical fallacy: mistaking correlation for causation.

What they fail to recognize is that situations that tend to increase the startle response, such as being the victim of a crime or serving in the military, also tend to increase the likelihood of a conservative point of view.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

The study seems to commit a classic logical fallacy: mistaking correlation for causation.

What they fail to recognize is that situations that tend to increase the startle response, such as being the victim of a crime or serving in the military, also tend to increase the likelihood of a conservative point of view.



While some of the secondary & tertiary accounts may make those mistakes, the actual study & the authors don't. One more example of my obsession with primary data.

"Political Attitudes Vary with Physiological Traits" Science 19 September 2008: Vol. 321. no. 5896, pp. 1667 - 1670. (If anyone without access would like a full text version, for educational reasons, PM me.):

"Our data reveal a correlation between physiological responses to threat and political attitudes but do not permit firm conclusions concerning the specific causal processes at work. Particular physiological responses to threat could cause the adoption of certain political attitudes, or the holding of particular political attitudes could cause people to respond in a certain physiological way to environmental threats, but neither of these seems probable. More likely is that physiological responses to generic threats and political attitudes on policies related to protecting the social order may both derive from a common source. Parents could both socialize their children to hold certain political attitudes and condition them to respond in a certain way to threatening stimuli, but conditioning involuntary reflex responses takes immediate and sustained reinforcement and punishment, and it is unlikely that this conditioning varies systematically across political beliefs.

"Alternatively, political attitudes and varying physiological responses to threat may both derive from neural activity patterns, perhaps those surrounding the amygdala. There is a connection between localized activation of the amygdala and aversive startle response (30). Amygdala activity is also crucial in shaping responses to socially threatening images (31, 32) and may be connected to political predispositions. Indeed, given that political and social attitudes are heritable (33–36) and that amygdala activity also has been traced to genetics (37–40), genetic variation relevant to amygdala activity could affect both physiological responses to threat and political attitudes bearing on threats to the social order.

"Our findings suggest that political attitudes vary with physiological traits linked to divergent manners of experiencing and processing environmental threats. Consequently, our research provides one possible explanation for both the lack of malleability in the beliefs of individuals with strong political convictions and for the associated ubiquity of political conflict."

Some secondary sources/reports have appreciated the difference as well:
"The study's authors are quick to point out that these correlations won't necessarily apply across the board, and that the findings don't imply that people take political positions out of fear. (Fear, of course, is not a bad thing — a certain amount of it is necessary for survival.) The point, rather, is that there may be something fundamentally biological about politics."

VR/Marg

Act as if everything you do matters, while laughing at yourself for thinking anything you do matters.
Tibetan Buddhist saying

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

The study seems to commit a classic logical fallacy: mistaking correlation for causation.

What they fail to recognize is that situations that tend to increase the startle response, such as being the victim of a crime or serving in the military, also tend to increase the likelihood of a conservative point of view.



I didn't see any suggestion of causation in the article. And they specifically stated that other factors are at work.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

The study seems to commit a classic logical fallacy: mistaking correlation for causation.

What they fail to recognize is that situations that tend to increase the startle response, such as being the victim of a crime or serving in the military, also tend to increase the likelihood of a conservative point of view.



I didn't see any suggestion of causation in the article. And they specifically stated that other factors are at work.



And sitting around smoking dope slows your reaction time....lol.

:)
linz
--
A conservative is just a liberal who's been mugged. A liberal is just a conservative who's been to jail

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

The study seems to commit a classic logical fallacy: mistaking correlation for causation.

What they fail to recognize is that situations that tend to increase the startle response, such as being the victim of a crime or serving in the military, also tend to increase the likelihood of a conservative point of view.



I didn't see any suggestion of causation in the article. And they specifically stated that other factors are at work.


And sitting around smoking dope slows your reaction time....lol.

:)
linz
:D:D

Dam, say it isnt






.
.
.
.
.
.
ah, so!
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
My son's going frog giggin' tonight. Am I a Lib or a Neo Con? Surely someone here knows....based on my lifestyle...lol.

Edited to add: I'm also having knee replacement in a little over a week....and I'm paying for it MYSELF.
--
A conservative is just a liberal who's been mugged. A liberal is just a conservative who's been to jail

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

My son's going frog giggin' tonight. Am I a Lib or a Neo Con? Surely someone here knows....based on my lifestyle...lol.

Edited to add: I'm also having knee replacement in a little over a week....and I'm paying for it MYSELF.



I like this thread!!:)
best wishes on your knee replacement!
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0