0
kallend

The rules

Recommended Posts

Quote


How is it possible to make a personal attack against an anonymous poster.



I guess only a moderator is alllowed to answer that question. After, getting his answer peer reviewed by other moderators of course. :|
Dave

Fallschirmsport Marl

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


How is it possible to make a personal attack against an anonymous poster.



Quote

Anonymous Meaning and Definition
(a.) Nameless; of unknown name; also, of unknown or unavowed authorship; as, an anonymous benefactor; an anonymous pamphlet or letter.



just because you don't know somebody's name, doesn't mean you can still verbally insult them on here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote


How is it possible to make a personal attack against an anonymous poster.



Quote

Anonymous Meaning and Definition
(a.) Nameless; of unknown name; also, of unknown or unavowed authorship; as, an anonymous benefactor; an anonymous pamphlet or letter.



just because you don't know somebody's name, doesn't mean you can still verbally insult them on here.


Some folks should know that better than others:o

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

"Personal attacks and hate posts will not be tolerated in any forum. Personal attacks on another user are a great way to earn some time off." This goes for any poster no matter how they fill out their profile.



I was curious as to the logic of "personal" as applied to someone who chooses to be an unperson.

With the exception of women with a legitimate fear of stalkers, I consider anonymous posters to be cowards.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>I was curious as to the logic of "personal" as applied to someone
>who chooses to be an unperson.

You don't have to agree with it. It's more a cause and effect thing. Make PA's, get warned/banned. You can create any logical underpinnings you like.

>With the exception of women with a legitimate fear of stalkers,
>I consider anonymous posters to be cowards.

That's fine; you can think whatever you want. You just can't post attacks directed towards them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

>I was curious as to the logic of "personal" as applied to someone
>who chooses to be an unperson.

You don't have to agree with it. It's more a cause and effect thing. Make PA's, get warned/banned. You can create any logical underpinnings you like.

>With the exception of women with a legitimate fear of stalkers,
>I consider anonymous posters to be cowards.

That's fine; you can think whatever you want. .



Thank you. I shall.:)
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
> Why do the rules allow for anonymous posters?

Because there's no way we can verify the information. If we required people to fill out their forms, then we'd get people like Dick Hertz from Uganda with 9999999 jumps. (Come to think of it, we get people like that anyway.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A sampling of Kallend's replies to me, today:

Quote

Feeling insecure? I have no idea what rushmc does. For all I know he is a climatologist. AT LEAST MARC HAS THE DECENCY TO POST HIS NAME AND NOT SNIPE ANONYMOUSLY.



Quote

Anonymous posters have no credibilty on any topic anyway.



Quote

For someone without the balls to reveal your name, your sure are obnoxious.



Followed, after a warning by Billvon, with:
Quote

I consider anonymous posters to be cowards.



I'm sure Kallend's statement wasn't directed at anyone particular. :P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Why do the rules allow for anonymous posters? Is it for people with financial ties that do not want to be identified with their beliefs? Just guessing.



Well, at the extreme end you have someone like PhillyKev who lost his job because some asshole didn't like his postings. Short of that there has been other examples of hostile behavior. So I don't see any reason to fault those who make that choice.

I take a middle ground - if you wanted to find me, you could. Many here know me personally. But you have to do more than just look me up in the phone book or the USPA database.

---
Kallend - you know full well that PAs spawn more PAs. If you choose an unnamed person to justify your lob at many named persons, they would respond in kind, and then we'd get exactly the environment that DZ attempts to avoid.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

just because you don't know somebody's name, doesn't mean you can still verbally insult them on here.


YES IT DOES! Some Dz.commers do it all the time! Of course who could blame them, they obviously have no other life! And have probably never been accussed of being mentally stable!
It just helps them to point themselves out those of us that are mentally stable! POST-ON!
You're as wonderful as a slinkie!! NOT REALLY GOOD FOR ANYTHING BUT THEY BRING A SMILE TO YOUR FACE WHEN PUSHED DOWN THE STAIRS.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

just because you don't know somebody's name, doesn't mean you can still verbally insult them on here. Some folks should know that better than others:o


YES they SHOULD : SHOULDN'T THEY?
You're as wonderful as a slinkie!! NOT REALLY GOOD FOR ANYTHING BUT THEY BRING A SMILE TO YOUR FACE WHEN PUSHED DOWN THE STAIRS.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0