0
gmanpilot

Calling All Liberals.

Recommended Posts

Which version of Liberalism do you more closely identify yourself with?

EDIT:

Well, I can't edit the poll, but I think this is how I wrote it:

A=
Classical Liberalism: old school; primary importance of the individual being unencumbered by the power of the state; the importance of the individual, and their freedom; life, liberty and property; property is a more compelling natural right than the right to participate in collective decision making; rejection of the “tyranny of the majority”.

B=
Present Day Liberalism: modern; argues for government regulation and partial intervention in economy; society has a responsibility to guarantee equal opportunity for each of its citizens; international institutions, such as the United Nations, are an implicit part of creating world peace and order; financial aid to poorer citizens.
_________________________________________
-There's always free cheese in a mouse trap.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Could you please edit so that each option is shown in its enirety? Perhaps explaining the difference between the two in your post?



Pretty clear to me.

Yesterday, liberals were a good thing. They brought about great changes like civil rights and fair labor laws.

But today, they represent crappy things, like baby killing, gay marriage, and calling handicapped people "handicapable". ;)


. . =(_8^(1)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Could you please edit so that each option is shown in its enirety? Perhaps explaining the difference between the two in your post?



Pretty clear to me.


;)



Yesterday, liberals were a good thing. They brought about great changes like civil rights and fair labor laws.

They still do, who do you think opposed Bush's Overtime Bill/Law? Who backs labor unions and who destroys them? I fail to see your point here in regard to, "civil rights and fair labor laws."

But today, they represent crappy things, like baby killing, gay marriage, and calling handicapped people "handicapable".

"baby killing" - as in abortion rights, as opposed to loss of control of one's body? It must be one way or the other.

"gay marriage" - as in the right to convert benefits and asets to another person the individual claims as their life partner? Seems pretty harmless to me.

"handicappable" - as in what? Not sure what this means; expanding the definition of who is handicapped?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
***Yesterday, liberals were a good thing. They brought about great changes like civil rights
. . .
But today, they represent crappy things, like . . . gay marriage . . ."

Seems to me they haven't changed all that much since the sixties. Gays have rights too, and as long as straights can't get better than a fifty percent success rate with their marraiges, it seems rather hypocritical that we tell the gays that we know what makes a marriage, and they don't.

And, I've never seen a liberal in favor of killing babies. Not one. Shrub apparently favors it, in Iraq, though. You don't really believe all the innocent civilians dying are all adults, do you?

Of course, the Democratic party originally supported slavery, so, yes, they have changed a lot since then.
Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Ok, I'm stumped...how can I edit the poll to display correctly??



I have no idea. Maybe if you re wrote the options in a post, so they could be read in their entirety, then an edit would no longer be necessary.
Don't mean to be a pain in the ass, I just like to know what I vote for.
Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Ok, I'm stumped...how can I edit the poll to display correctly??



You can't. In titles and polls, their are no line breaks, so they just scroll off the right side. You can always read them by rolling your browser window over there, though.

If you want to put everything into the standard post box, you ought to edit your first post to include the definitions.
-- Tom Aiello

[email protected]
SnakeRiverBASE.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Seems to me they haven't changed all that much since the sixties.



I'd take issue with that.

Contrast:

"I have a dream that my four children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character."

with current pushes for affirmative action (i.e. judgment by color of skin).
-- Tom Aiello

[email protected]
SnakeRiverBASE.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

You can always read them by rolling your browser window over there, though.



I don't seem to have the horizontal scroll bar on the poll questions. Is this something specific with Mozilla Firefox, or do other browsers have this limitation, as well?
Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

You can always read them by rolling your browser window over there, though.



I don't seem to have the horizontal scroll bar on the poll questions. Is this something specific with Mozilla Firefox, or do other browsers have this limitation, as well?



No idea. I'm using Safari, and I can scroll right until you exceed the line limitation of the poll itself, at which point your text is cut off (that's about three page widths down there).

Perhaps just re-post the explanations into the thread?
-- Tom Aiello

[email protected]
SnakeRiverBASE.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

No idea. I'm using Safari,



LOL

Yeah, damn near everythimg works right on a Mac. Mozilla, which is superior to IE in most applications, IMO (although my roommate can't get it to work well on his Mac, go figure) is the next best thing, for those of us with PCs. Cuts way back on pop-ups, adware, etc.
Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I go with the dictionary definition, myself.

lib·er·al ( P )

1. Not limited to or by established, traditional, orthodox, or authoritarian attitudes, views, or dogmas; free from bigotry.

2. Favoring proposals for reform, open to new ideas for progress, and tolerant of the ideas and behavior of others; broad-minded.

3. Of, relating to, or characteristic of liberalism.

But what it really comes down to is what you do, as seen through the above definition.

Power shortage? A conservative will lobby to reduce emissions controls so more power plants can be built. A liberal will put in a solar power system.

Expensive gas? A conservative will push for more government support of drilling and reduction in regulations on refineries. A liberal will buy a diesel or a hybrid.

Gay marriage? A conservative will try to define marriage so as to exclude some people. A liberal will want everyone to have the same rights.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I go with the dictionary definition, myself....
3. Of, relating to, or characteristic of liberalism...



That's kind of what I was trying to get at; whether or not folks identify with the original intent and definition of Liberalism. The definition of Liberalism and the real-world policies that are thought to be liberal seem to be, to me, worlds apart.
_________________________________________
-There's always free cheese in a mouse trap.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

That's kind of what I was trying to get at; whether or not folks identify with the original intent and definition of Liberalism. The definition of Liberalism and the real-world policies that are thought to be liberal seem to be, to me, worlds apart.



I don't see the differences you do. Today's "liberal" seems to fit very well with the definition given by Billvon IMO.
Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

But today, they represent crappy things, like baby killing, gay marriage, and calling handicapped people "handicapable"


How's that crappy?

"For once you have tasted Absinthe you will walk the earth with your eyes turned towards the gutter, for there you have been and there you will long to return."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

That's kind of what I was trying to get at; whether or not folks identify with the original intent and definition of Liberalism. The definition of Liberalism and the real-world policies that are thought to be liberal seem to be, to me, worlds apart.



I don't see the differences you do. Today's "liberal" seems to fit very well with the definition given by Billvon IMO.



I see the difference very clearly. A liberal by the definition that billvon quoted, when confronted with a problem such as poverty, might look for new solutions to the problem that could benefit society as a whole. In reality, liberals are likely to tax the taxpayers to pay for programs that often perpetuate the problem, or pass legislation like affirmative action.

linz
--
A conservative is just a liberal who's been mugged. A liberal is just a conservative who's been to jail

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I go with the dictionary definition, myself.

lib·er·al ( P )

1. Not limited to or by established, traditional, orthodox, or authoritarian attitudes, views, or dogmas; free from bigotry.

2. Favoring proposals for reform, open to new ideas for progress, and tolerant of the ideas and behavior of others; broad-minded.

3. Of, relating to, or characteristic of liberalism.



That is pretty much the definition I would go with for myself too, since I would probably be considered a liberal...

But generally I don't like to label myself as such... since it seems to make people assume that I will automatically have "x" opinion on "x" issue (as labels of any kind tend to do).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

A liberal by the definition that billvon quoted, when confronted with a problem such as poverty, might look for new solutions to the problem that could benefit society as a whole. In reality, liberals are likely to tax the taxpayers to pay for programs that often perpetuate the problem, or pass legislation like affirmative action.



I don't see that at all. We don't have unemployment insurance in this country for the benefit of unemployed individuals, we have UI for the benefit of those who still have their jobs, because if you begin taking money out of the economy, the effects, including unemployment, are going to be exponential.

Personally, I favor certain social programs, because I understand that the money they cost will be made back in the long run with a more productive society that is better qualified to participate in an international economy in the future. I don't see liberal solutions perpetuating problems.
Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Classical Liberalism is often referred to as Libertarianism in the modern context.



Wait, I'venever head that and look at them as polar opposites. The Libertarians answer to social problems (health, etc) is to let the church dispose of them w/o any/much governmental help.

Modern day Libertarianism is akin to the neo-cons IMO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Today's "liberal" seems to fit very well with the definition given by Billvon IMO.



That's exactly what I am trying to define with my poll, whether or not todays Liberal (within the skydiving community at least) truly identifies with the classical definition of Liberalism or the present-day, US version of Liberalism. I would imagine the founders of Liberal Thinking would not recognize todays Liberal.
_________________________________________
-There's always free cheese in a mouse trap.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

In Reply To
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Classical Liberalism is often referred to as Libertarianism in the modern context.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Wait, I've never head that and look at them as polar opposites.



I think Tom's reference is dead on.
_________________________________________
-There's always free cheese in a mouse trap.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0