0
PhillyKev

I love it when moral crusaders are exposed for their true colors.

Recommended Posts

Quote

1. Proposition 54 will undermine accountability in school reform.

The California Public Schools Accountability Act of 1999 is the state’s central school reform program. It requires schools to set goals for student achievement and it demands accountability by instituting testing to measure achievement.

Racial data is a central part of the evaluation process. It allows schools to determine whether some groups are improving more than others and it allows schools to target resources for the best overall improvement. Without this measurement data, school reform would be stripped of accountability.



Racial data is a central part of the evaluation process? Schools are to be held accountable via racial statistics? Why not just say that "School 'A' is not meeting the standards, while School 'B' is meeting the standards?" Schools shoudl be held accountable to reading, writing and arithmetic. This is a problem with liberals. Conservatives see kids that can't read. Liberals see white kids, black kids, and hispanic kids that can't read.

Quote

2. Proposition 54 will eliminate public health programs that save lives.

Public health prevention resources are targeted by race because some health problems affect different races disproportionately, and because cultural differences make different prevention approaches more effective with different groups. For instance:

Contra Costa health officials noted that African American women had a lower rate of detection of breast cancer than white women. Through targeted outreach, the county achieved its goal of equalizing the rate of detection between African Americans and whites. This preventative approach saves lives and taxpayer dollars.
California state programs for teen pregnancy prevention credit dramatic drops in teen pregnancy to targeted programs which communicate differently to different groups of young people. Prevention ads to Latinas are different than to white women because they respond to different media messages in different ways. These prevention approaches, which would not be allowed under PROP. 54, prevent teen pregnancies and save taxpayers millions of dollars.
Similar racial data is used in preventing tobacco use, HIV/AIDS and obesity just to name a few examples.



Do you mean to suggest that there are differences between whitey, hispanics and blacks? Do you mean that using racial data allows people to treat races differently? You are advocating treating people differently on the basis of race. I always thought that was wrong.

Quote

3. Proposition 54 will hinder law enforcement efforts.

Hate crimes, racial profiling mitigation and community policing all rely on racial data of police officers, suspects and victims to carry out laws. Understanding and addressing hate crime patterns and racial profiling patterns are only possible if we have accurate information.



This one is a laugher! You are saying that if the state quits judging people on race, then we won't be able to make sure that cops don't racially profile! Yeah, we don't want to understand crime patterns. We only want hate crime patterns. Even funnier is that profiling is bad because it uses racial statistics, but profiling is good with community based policing.

It's too bad that dude that tried to mug me on Olympic Street never said he hated me. He just pulled a knife. No hate crime, no foul, I guess. Let's let the Eastside latino gangs shoot it out. Even though they kill Latinos, we know they don't hate Latinos.

Quote


4. Proposition 54 will wipe out civil rights enforcement.

Without racial data, victims of discrimination in state employment or contracting won’t be able to address patterns of racial discrimination. This initiative makes discrimination protections impossible to enforce. That’s why even Prop. 209 author Tom Wood opposes the measure.



Wow! I always thought that rights belonged to individuals, and not to races or sexes. I always thought that the 4th Amendment protected individuals against unreasonable search and seizure. Here I believed that the 5th Amendment protected an individual's right against self-incrmination and gave the right to confront and jury trial.

Silly me for thinking that that 1st Amendment stated that Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. I guess they could have meant "white people" or "black people" but they must have forgotten that word when they wrote it.

I guess I'm even worse for believing that the 14th Amendment stated that "No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

Dang. I forgot that equal protection means that some are more equal than others. I guess that's my blond self again, thinking that civil rights are individual rights, when really the Constitution meant black rights, and women's rights, and white rights, all of which are different.

Thanks for pointing that out. Boy, do I feel rotten that California wants to quit judging people on race. Now that I know that being colorblind is a bad thing, I'll make sure I vote no on 54.


My wife is hotter than your wife.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BUUUUZZZZ WRONG ANSWER AGAIN..

Quote

I haven't made up any facts I quoted the 1968 facts as they were. The fact that I stressed that this was even after 9 years of communism should have been enough to understand that I wasn't referring to anything after that



The Facts

Population

Total Pop. 2003 11,263,429
mulatto 51%, 5,744348
white 37%, 4,167,468
black 11%, 1,328977
Chinese 1% 112,634
------------------------------------------------------
Cubans with African descent 6,983,325

http://factfinder.census.gov/bf/_lang=en_vt_name=DEC_2000_SF1_U_DP1_geo_id=01000US.html

Lists all Cuban Americans at 1,241,685
White Cubans from above 4,167,468

Total 5,409,153

Edit to add... this is assuming that ALL Cuban Americans are white... which is not the case.

So when I do the Math..... you are a mathematician... I come up with more Cubans of African descent than of the Purity of Blood-Spanish you are espousing.

My whole point in all of this is facts... when people have racist ideas floating around in thier heads....at some point it will bite them in the ass.....Rush... to get back on topic .....screwed up and made assumptions based on his ideas floating around in his head..... Now People are calling him on it.

>:(Jeanne

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


BUUUUZZZZ WRONG ANSWER AGAIN..

Quote

I haven't made up any facts I quoted the 1968 facts as they were. The fact that I stressed that this was even after 9 years of communism should have been enough to understand that I wasn't referring to anything after that



The Facts

Population

Total Pop. 2003 11,263,429
mulatto 51%, 5,744348
white 37%, 4,167,468
black 11%, 1,328977
Chinese 1% 112,634
------------------------------------------------------
Cubans with African descent 6,983,325

http://factfinder.census.gov/bf/_lang=en_vt_name=DEC_2000_SF1_U_DP1_geo_id=01000US.html

Lists all Cuban Americans at 1,241,685
White Cubans from above 4,167,468

Total 5,409,153

So when I do the Math..... you are a mathematician... I come up with more Cubans of African descent than of the Purity of Blood-Spanish you are espousing.

My whole point in all of this is facts... when people have racist ideas floating around in thier heads....at some point it will bite them in the ass.....Rush... to get back on topic .....screwed up and made assumptions based on his ideas floating around in his head..... Now People are calling him on it.

>:(Jeanne


I get the feeling you are just doing this to annoy me but to give you the benefit of doubt I will answer you one more time. First of all we are looking at 2003 data and as I have already said I really don't care about that. Most of the Cubans in the U.S. came in the 60's or in 1980 through the Mariel. Next I think the main problem we have here is that you do not know what a Mulatto is. A mulatto is a person mixed between black and white. So when you take your
mulatto 51%, 5,744348, what you are saying is people born after races were mixed there after communism. The only solid number you have there that you could suggest was the case before 40+ years of communism is the black 11%, 1,328977. Even there Castro has replaced population with Africans from Angola after the fact. I don't know why it is so difficult to understand that I don't speak for Cuba after my family left it or for that matter after the overwelming majority of Cuban-Americans left it. The Cuban-Americans you see are people who came from a different Cuba. 40 years of Communisms changes everything. Take a trip to the former East Germany even 13 years after the reunification and then cross over into what used to be the the West. The only difference there is that they did not have different races which would mix during that time. But the poverty that was cause by left wing ideology is still extremely noticed.
If I could make a wish, I think I'd pass.
Can't think of anything I need
No cigarettes, no sleep, no light, no sound.
Nothing to eat, no books to read.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Text of my original post is green.
Text of Lawrocket's reply is purple.
Text of my response to Lawrocket is blue.
this stuff gets confusing when you have multiple quotes going on.


1. Proposition 54 will undermine accountability in school reform.

The California Public Schools Accountability Act of 1999 is the state’s central school reform program. It requires schools to set goals for student achievement and it demands accountability by instituting testing to measure achievement.

Racial data is a central part of the evaluation process. It allows schools to determine whether some groups are improving more than others and it allows schools to target resources for the best overall improvement. Without this measurement data, school reform would be stripped of accountability.



Racial data is a central part of the evaluation process? Schools are to be held accountable via racial statistics?



Yes. If, for some reason, Latinos and European Americans are performing at very different levels at the same school, the district needs to be able to analyze why this is and adjust methods accordingly... do they need to send notices home to parents in English and Spanish? do they need to re-evaluate their programs for English Language Learners? Is there some kind of discrimination going on that needs to be addressed? Schools need to be able to look at these things.



Why not just say that "School 'A' is not meeting the standards, while School 'B' is meeting the standards?"



They do. However, they also need to say WHY the school is not meeting standards. They need to analyze which areas they are having problems with, and which groups are having the problems... if, for example, females are performing at a much lower rate than males in science, perhaps teaching methods need to be re evaluated... without the gender data, they can't do that. If you don't know who to target for assistance, you can't make appropriate improvements.



Schools shoudl be held accountable to reading, writing and arithmetic. This is a problem with liberals. Conservatives see kids that can't read. Liberals see white kids, black kids, and hispanic kids that can't read.



No... what I see is WHY certain children can't read...
Children who are members of ethnic minority groups other than Asian statistically perform at a lower level than those children of Asian or European American descent. There has to be a reason for this very clear breakdown... Analyzing the racial data gives us some clues as to why.



2. Proposition 54 will eliminate public health programs that save lives.

Public health prevention resources are targeted by race because some health problems affect different races disproportionately, and because cultural differences make different prevention approaches more effective with different groups. For instance:

Contra Costa health officials noted that African American women had a lower rate of detection of breast cancer than white women. Through targeted outreach, the county achieved its goal of equalizing the rate of detection between African Americans and whites. This preventative approach saves lives and taxpayer dollars.
California state programs for teen pregnancy prevention credit dramatic drops in teen pregnancy to targeted programs which communicate differently to different groups of young people. Prevention ads to Latinas are different than to white women because they respond to different media messages in different ways. These prevention approaches, which would not be allowed under PROP. 54, prevent teen pregnancies and save taxpayers millions of dollars.
Similar racial data is used in preventing tobacco use, HIV/AIDS and obesity just to name a few examples.




Do you mean to suggest that there are differences between whitey, hispanics and blacks? Do you mean that using racial data allows people to treat races differently? You are advocating treating people differently on the basis of race. I always thought that was wrong.



There are many cultural differences between people of different races. Taking CULTURE into account is not wrong. it is effective. Culture is a large part of who someone is, because it plays a large role in dictating how we react to certain situations.

People who are marketing anything, be it medical responsibility or a new brand of soda, have to take their audience into account.



3. Proposition 54 will hinder law enforcement efforts.

Hate crimes, racial profiling mitigation and community policing all rely on racial data of police officers, suspects and victims to carry out laws. Understanding and addressing hate crime patterns and racial profiling patterns are only possible if we have accurate information.



This one is a laugher! You are saying that if the state quits judging people on race, then we won't be able to make sure that cops don't racially profile! Yeah, we don't want to understand crime patterns. We only want hate crime patterns. Even funnier is that profiling is bad because it uses racial statistics, but profiling is good with community based policing.



If we know, for example, that many more European Americans are being pulled over for speeding, we can draw one of two conclusions....

1. European Americans speed more.
2. European Americans are being unfairly targeted for speeding tickets.

If the first is true, no worries... justice is being served.
if the second is true, there is a miscarriage of justice happening, and something needs to be done. Without racial statistics, we have no assurance that people are not being targeted unfairly because of their skin color.




It's too bad that dude that tried to mug me on Olympic Street never said he hated me. He just pulled a knife. No hate crime, no foul, I guess. Let's let the Eastside latino gangs shoot it out. Even though they kill Latinos, we know they don't hate Latinos.



if he was attacking you for your money and not your race, it wasn't a hate crime.

A hate crime, for example, is when three men drag another man behind a truck for miles until he's dead just because they are uncomfortable with the gender of the person he loves.

the penalties are different based on motive.




4. Proposition 54 will wipe out civil rights enforcement.

Without racial data, victims of discrimination in state employment or contracting won’t be able to address patterns of racial discrimination. This initiative makes discrimination protections impossible to enforce. That’s why even Prop. 209 author Tom Wood opposes the measure.



Wow! I always thought that rights belonged to individuals, and not to races or sexes. I always thought that the 4th Amendment protected individuals against unreasonable search and seizure.



Racial data gives us the opportunity to ensure that no discrimination is taking place, and that everyone is being treated equally. If more Asian Americans are targeted for search warrants than African Americans who are suspected of similar crimes, chances are there is some discrimination taking place on the part of the judge issuing the warrants. This problem needs to be analyzed and dealt with. Wtihout racial data, we would never know that the problem exists.




Here I believed that the 5th Amendment protected an individual's right against self-incrmination and gave the right to confront and jury trial.


It does. And racial data ensures that all individuals in the system are treated equally, regardless of race. Racial data permits us to look at patterns and make sure no malice exists on the part of the people in charge of administering justice.




Silly me for thinking that that 1st Amendment stated that Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

I guess they could have meant "white people" or "black people" but they must have forgotten that word when they wrote it.

I guess I'm even worse for believing that the 14th Amendment stated that "No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."


none of this is relevant other than to say that racial data enables us to ensure that EVERYONE is treated equally. It is a safeguard to ensure that no one group is a target, and that justice is spread equally across the nation rather than targeted at specific racial groups while others face no consequences.



Dang. I forgot that equal protection means that some are more equal than others. I guess that's my blond self again, thinking that civil rights are individual rights, when really the Constitution meant black rights, and women's rights, and white rights, all of which are different.



they're not different. we collect racial data to ensure that these groups are NOT being treated differently when it comes to justice and civil rights.



Thanks for pointing that out.



Anytime.



Boy, do I feel rotten that California wants to quit judging people on race.



We're not judging people on race. We collect racial data to ensure that people are NOT being judged unfairly because of their race, but rather, by, as the great MLK Jr. said "the content of their character."


Now that I know that being colorblind is a bad thing, I'll make sure I vote no on 54.


please do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I get the feeling you are just doing this to annoy me but to give you the benefit of doubt I will answer you one more time. First of all we are looking at 2003 data and as I have already said I really don't care about that. Most of the Cubans in the U.S. came in the 60's or in 1980 through the Mariel. Next I think the main problem we have here is that you do not know what a Mulatto is. A mulatto is a person mixed between black and white. So when you take your
mulatto 51%, 5,744348, what you are saying is people born after races were mixed there after communism. The only solid number you have there that you could suggest was the case before 40+ years of communism is the black 11%, 1,328977.



The numbers speak for themselves.... this is the TOTAL Cuban population here and there.... Following the ENTIRE thread of this and other threads.. boils down to the racial purity that you keep coming up with. I really do not think that in this day and age that Racial Purity is a worthy goal on this planet. there has been so much admixture that finding PURE populations are impossible except in small enclaves where aborignal people managed to escape. Too many people have migrated from one place to another and assumptions such as Racial Purity lead to more Sarajevos, Kosovos, Croatias, Slovenias, and some of the other recent Ethnic cleansings in Africa. ITs not such a stretch for attitudes such as that to blossom into Dachau's, and Aushwitz's. At some point human beings need to allow other human beings the right to live as just another human being.

>:(Jeanne

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Actually all conversations should be like this, but unfortunately some people are too stubborn to reason with.



If they disagree with you, they are stubborn and unreasonable?



If people don't agree with me, I like to refer to them as "closed-minded". ;) Fortunately, the intelligent people always agree with me. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

the penalties are different based on motive.



So much for equal protection of the law. Interesting twist to justice. :o Don't think I've ever heard someone say that.




From the massachusetts state website:

Motives matter: The criminal justice system frequently differentiates the punishment assigned to a given crime and offender based on motive. For example, in many states a murder for hire is more likely to draw the death penalty, than a similar murder committed without this purpose. The distinction between murder one, murder two, and manslaughter turns largely on motive. A crime can draw dramatically different penalties, as well as a more intensive law enforcement response, if it reflects a purpose of causing violent political change—terrorism. In general, the more purposeful a criminal act, the more seriously it is regarded by the law, and the more likely it is to result in a harsher penalty.

another example...

Possession of marijuana is a misdemeanor under California Health and Safety Code Section 11357.

Possession with intent to sell any amount of marijuana is a felony. Health and Safety Code 11359.

see... motive. in both of the above examples, you have a person who possesses marijuana... however, WHY the person possesses marijuana affects how the court treats him or her.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
A well written post. I'm going to stray from your color scheme and quote sparingly. An underlying theme throughout your remarks is a belief that race is a factor in everything. I do not share this belief, as you'll see if you read on. Race doesn't really mean a damned thing to me.

Yes. If, for some reason, Latinos and European Americans are performing at very different levels at the same school, the district needs to be able to analyze why this is and adjust methods accordingly... do they need to send notices home to parents in English and Spanish? do they need to re-evaluate their programs for English Language Learners? Is there some kind of discrimination going on that needs to be addressed? Schools need to be able to look at these things.


Race is the factor here? I'd say parents' tax returns and education levels would show a much stronger correlation with student performance than race. Only those who adhere to the common stereotypes of minorities would believe otherwise.
Quote



They do. However, they also need to say WHY the school is not meeting standards. They need to analyze which areas they are having problems with, and which groups are having the problems... if, for example, females are performing at a much lower rate than males in science, perhaps teaching methods need to be re evaluated... without the gender data, they can't do that. If you don't know who to target for assistance, you can't make appropriate improvements.


Again you break people into groups based on race. There are poor performers from all races. Who cares what race they are? The students should be targeted for extra assistance by performance - not race. Academic tests determine who needs to be targeted. Race is irrelevant.
Quote



No... what I see is WHY certain children can't read...
Children who are members of ethnic minority groups other than Asian statistically perform at a lower level than those children of Asian or European American descent. There has to be a reason for this very clear breakdown... Analyzing the racial data gives us some clues as to why.


The race of a child has nothing to do with their academic success. You can possibly show a correlation between the two statistically, but those using such a statistic are using statistics as a drunk does a lamp post - it sure as HELL isn't for illumination. The amount of motivation they get from their parents - regardless of color - along with the child's work ethic determine his/her academic cuccess. Analyzing racial data for a reason would be beneficial only for those who believe race is a factor adhere to your tenets. I do not believe this and see absolutely no logical argument to change my belief. Again - try parents' tax returns as a metric.
Quote



If we know, for example, that many more European Americans are being pulled over for speeding, we can draw one of two conclusions....

1. European Americans speed more.
2. European Americans are being unfairly targeted for speeding tickets.

If the first is true, no worries... justice is being served.
if the second is true, there is a miscarriage of justice happening, and something needs to be done. Without racial statistics, we have no assurance that people are not being targeted unfairly because of their skin color.


And without checking underneath my bed every single night, I have no assurance that a one eyed one horned flying purple people eater isn't there. The argument you present is one based on fear. I don't buy it. Cops do their jobs well and 'tis the few bad apples that give cops some bad publicity. Unfairly targeted because of their skin color my ass. Contrary to the garbage put out by the left and their syncophant organizations, racism isn't prevalent in America today.

Quote



the penalties are different based on motive.


So much for equal protection under the law.

Nightingale, all throughout your well written and thought out post we see your assumption that race is the predominant factor in this, that, and the other. It isn't. Individuals determine who they are and what they do. Some choose to identify themselves by their race and blame their failures on everyone else being racially prejudiced. These are weak individuals who don't have the courage to face life and deal with it head on. Those are the ones who support racially discriminatory programs and scream 'racism' every time they lose or come up short in anything - it gives them an ez out from reality. They are cowards and I want no law on the books that will enable them to take this ez out in any manner.
Vinny the Anvil
Post Traumatic Didn't Make The Lakers Syndrome is REAL
JACKASS POWER!!!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Ummm...I said forget about the comments about McNabb.....I didn't really have a problem with his opinion on that matter. He said he thought the media needed to hype a black quarterback, and they may be entirely true. I think that was a non-story.

This post was specifically regarding his hypocrisy about drug addicts considering he is one.



This whole story is getting blown out of proportion because the white media was looking for a newsperson to hang himself :D

Well, guess he took care of the big and fat part....just not the idiot!
_________________________________________
you can burn the land and boil the sea, but you can't take the sky from me....
I WILL fly again.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That is interesting, but I was referring to justice, not law.

In your example, you use murder. For either case to be murder, the victim is dead and is not concerned with the motive. If they stabbed them twelve times, do they get a longer sentence than only 4 times? If they are angrier?

In England, Christine English murdered her boyfriend by ramming him into a utility pole. She confessed, but said she had PMS. She was not convicted.

Is "I was in a bad mood..." a defense? Apparently that is an acceptable motive.

I have been hit by racists, rednecks, and drunks. It hurts the same. The response was identical.

One set of rules for everyone. That is justice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
a well written post.



thank you.


An underlying theme throughout your remarks is a belief that race is a factor in everything.


Actually, I don't think race should be a factor in very many things. It will always be a factor in medicine, because there are different health risks associated with different races... for example, being African American puts you at a much higher risk of Sickle Cell Anemia than if you were any other race. Its a genetic protection... if you have or are a genetic carrier of Sickle Cell, you are immune to malaria.

The reason we need to continue to collect racial data is, frankly, that 1960 was not that long ago. There are still people out there who actively discriminate. Trust me, I've worked for one... I used to work in an apartment complex as a leasing agent. My supervisor actively discouraged us from renting to Latinos. He was of a firm belief that they would overoccupy their apartments, leave things a mess, and not pay their rent. I ignored him and followed the law (rent to anyone who meets qualifications, regardless of race, color, gender, handicap, country of origin, religion, familial status, or sexual orientation). but there were other people working there who were afraid of losing their jobs, and did what he wanted. Discrimination on the basis of race is illegal.... however if racial data is not collected, the authorities will never realize that, in an area that has a large Latino population, out of a building of 400 apartments, only 6 are occupied by Latinos. Without this data, the department of housing and urban development would have NO WAY to prove that a crime has been committed. That's why collecting racial data is important. Without it, this guy couldn't be prosecuted. (I have reported the situation to HUD... did so the day after I quit).


I do not share this belief, as you'll see if you read on. Race doesn't really mean a damned thing to me.


Yes. If, for some reason, Latinos and European Americans are performing at very different levels at the same school, the district needs to be able to analyze why this is and adjust methods accordingly... do they need to send notices home to parents in English and Spanish? do they need to re-evaluate their programs for English Language Learners? Is there some kind of discrimination going on that needs to be addressed? Schools need to be able to look at these things.

Race is the factor here?

no... race MAY BE a factor.


I'd say parents' tax returns and education levels would show a much stronger correlation with student performance than race. Only those who adhere to the common stereotypes of minorities would believe otherwise.

parents education levels are a good indicator. However, without tracking racial data, we would not know that sending handouts home written in English and in Spanish would help the situation... we wouldn't know that the school may need to hire a translator to help teachers communicate with parents.



They do. However, they also need to say WHY the school is not meeting standards. They need to analyze which areas they are having problems with, and which groups are having the problems... if, for example, females are performing at a much lower rate than males in science, perhaps teaching methods need to be re evaluated... without the gender data, they can't do that. If you don't know who to target for assistance, you can't make appropriate improvements.


Again you break people into groups based on race. There are poor performers from all races. Who cares what race they are? The students should be targeted for extra assistance by performance - not race. Academic tests determine who needs to be targeted. Race is irrelevant.


um... I broke people into GENDER in the above example... not race. The law also prohibits collecting data based on gender. Those of us who are female and have been routinely passed over for promotion know this kind of discrimination is alive and well. Women still make less than men. Without the data, we can't track that.



No... what I see is WHY certain children can't read...
Children who are members of ethnic minority groups other than Asian statistically perform at a lower level than those children of Asian or European American descent. There has to be a reason for this very clear breakdown... Analyzing the racial data gives us some clues as to why.


The race of a child has nothing to do with their academic success.


It has been shown in study after study that CULTURE has much to do with academic success... Read up on the Kameamea Schools in Hawaii if you want more information there. Tracking someone's race is a fairly reliable way of tracking culture.


You can possibly show a correlation between the two statistically, but those using such a statistic are using statistics as a drunk does a lamp post - it sure as HELL isn't for illumination. The amount of motivation they get from their parents - regardless of color - along with the child's work ethic determine his/her academic cuccess.


I feel it is safe to say you are not a teacher. A child's culture has quite a lot to do with his or her academic success... again, read up on Kameamea. Focus on why the Kameamea schools came about (native Hawaiians were failing in public schools across the board in Hawaii) and what happened (the state, with assistance, designed programs that took into account the culture of native Hawaiians... academic success took off)



Analyzing racial data for a reason would be beneficial only for those who believe race is a factor adhere to your tenets.


see above example of kameamea


I do not believe this and see absolutely no logical argument to change my belief. Again - try parents' tax returns as a metric.


again, see kameamea



If we know, for example, that many more European Americans are being pulled over for speeding, we can draw one of two conclusions....

1. European Americans speed more.
2. European Americans are being unfairly targeted for speeding tickets.

If the first is true, no worries... justice is being served.
if the second is true, there is a miscarriage of justice happening, and something needs to be done. Without racial statistics, we have no assurance that people are not being targeted unfairly because of their skin color.


And without checking underneath my bed every single night, I have no assurance that a one eyed one horned flying purple people eater isn't there. The argument you present is one based on fear.


I've seen discrimination in action. see above example of the apartment complex. I assure you, race is still an issue in many things that it shouldn't be an issue in. Tracking racial data is the only way to fix this.


I don't buy it. Cops do their jobs well and 'tis the few bad apples that give cops some bad publicity. Unfairly targeted because of their skin color my ass. Contrary to the garbage put out by the left and their syncophant organizations, racism isn't prevalent in America today.


its much more prevalent than you think.




Quote



the penalties are different based on motive.


So much for equal protection under the law.

Nightingale, all throughout your well written and thought out post we see your assumption that race is the predominant factor in this, that, and the other. It isn't. Individuals determine who they are and what they do. Some choose to identify themselves by their race and blame their failures on everyone else being racially prejudiced.


sometimes, they are being discriminated against. sometimes they're not. tracking racial data gives us the information to accurately determine whether or not the person has a case.



These are weak individuals who don't have the courage to face life and deal with it head on. Those are the ones who support racially discriminatory programs and scream 'racism' every time they lose or come up short in anything - it gives them an ez out from reality. They are cowards and I want no law on the books that will enable them to take this ez out in any manner.




sometimes people take advantage. sometimes there is legitimate discrimination. tracking racial data enables us to know the difference.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The numbers speak for themselves.... this is the TOTAL Cuban population here and there....
----------------------------------------------------
You may wish that was the case but that is untrue. Those number very clearly represent who is living in Cuba right now. I guess you think when they talk about the square miles in Cuba, in that link you provided, they are also counting Miami Dade county and Union City, NJ. It is also untrue to suggest that people came from Cuba with proportionate racial or economic statuses. You need to learn some more about that if you wish to speak of it. Here go read some. http://www.asianweek.com/2000_04_27/opinion_voices_rodriguez.html There is an article for you.
====================================
Following the ENTIRE thread of this and other threads.. boils down to the racial purity that you keep coming up with. I really do not think that in this day and age that Racial Purity is a worthy goal on this planet. there has been so much admixture that finding PURE populations are impossible except in small enclaves where aborignal people managed to escape. Too many people have migrated from one place to another and assumptions such as Racial Purity lead to more Sarajevos, Kosovos, Croatias, Slovenias, and some of the other recent Ethnic cleansings in Africa. ITs not such a stretch for attitudes such as that to blossom into Dachau's, and Aushwitz's. At some point human beings need to allow other human beings the right to live as just another human being.
-------------------------------------
If all this is truly what you think then why have you not yet expressed support for propostion 54. I will tell you why because you are acting as a puppet for the left wing of the United States. They fill your mind with innaccuracies and through in meaningless statistics such as what became of a country when most of the hardworking people left and other populations were brought in. A more meaningful statistic to focus on would be the Cuban-Americans in the U.S. There you would find that Cuban-Americans are almost twice as likely to have a salary over $50K. /yearly than Americans in general, thet are more likely to go to college, to own a business, even to hold a political office on a national as well as local scale, they are for the most part living the American dream. Cubans-Americans generally don't practice misegination yet the last elected leader in Cuba was Batista (a mulatto). Celia Cruz (Black salsa singer) was loved by most Cubans. But just as well, most white Cubans would not even consider misegination. I know that this may be difficult for you to understand because of your background. {KKK linked Democracts (Dixiecrats) or bleeded-heart, wacko left wing liberals}. But there is a happy medium of people who are proud of who they are and still don't find the need to set churches on fire or on the other extreme pay slave reparations to somebody's who great-greatgrandfather was a slave.
If I could make a wish, I think I'd pass.
Can't think of anything I need
No cigarettes, no sleep, no light, no sound.
Nothing to eat, no books to read.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I will tell you why because you are acting as a puppet for the left wing of the United States.



Of everyone in this thread, she isn't the one with the brain of a Muppet.

Quote

your background. {KKK linked Democracts (Dixiecrats) or bleeded-heart, wacko left wing liberals}



That insult is fucking pathetic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Again you break people into groups based on race. There are poor performers from all races. Who cares what race they are? The students should be targeted for extra assistance by performance - not race.



I completely agree with you Anvil. The decision to give or not give assistance should be based on perfomance and not on race.

However, now we have to think of the next step, what type of assistance to give. Not every perfomance issue can be solved with the same typical solution. Race or gender related information can help design a workable solution for a problem.

Canada made this mistake quite some years ago in a different form by not allowing Metro Toronto police officers to indicate race on incident and arrest forms.


Never thought I'd see the day where the US is following Canada's lead ;):P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

insult deleted. Cut it out



Dang! Having been on the recieving end of many-a-Holder insult, I was truly looking forward to witnessing one.

BillV, you'd get along great with GH, he's got a sticker on his Mercedes coupe that says something like "Bush, the other-other white meat", or something.

It actually says - "BUSH - The only dope worth shooting"

Anyway, it wasn't really an insult, more of an observation about the nature of relationships between the early native americans, the buffalo, and the resultant genetic makeup of Texas conservatives. Very astute, even if I do say so myself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

A liberal with a gas-guzzling upper-crusty Mercedes? Does he feel any guilt about having such a vehicle, Deuce? How many books could that car buy for inner city schools? How many soldiers have to die to fuel it? How many dolphins must get caught in the ship's screws to transport it here?

Who cares ? I'm doing my bit for the economy by recklessly consuming. Of course if I can cause some disconnect by painting a Mercedes Kompressor with anti Busgh slogans, it's all the better. You wouldn't believe how many nice people wave at me on the freeway. Poor things don't seem to be using the whole hand all the time though. Best money I every spent for amusement value I have to say.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

A liberal with a gas-guzzling upper-crusty Mercedes? Does he feel any guilt about having such a vehicle, Deuce? How many books could that car buy for inner city schools? How many soldiers have to die to fuel it? How many dolphins must get caught in the ship's screws to transport it here?


Who cares ? I'm doing my bit for the economy by recklessly consuming. Of course if I can cause some disconnect by painting a Mercedes Kompressor with anti Busgh slogans, it's all the better. You wouldn't believe how many nice people wave at me on the freeway. Poor things don't seem to be using the whole hand all the time though. Best money I every spent for amusement value I have to say.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

A liberal with a gas-guzzling upper-crusty Mercedes? Does he feel any guilt about having such a vehicle, Deuce? How many books could that car buy for inner city schools? How many soldiers have to die to fuel it? How many dolphins must get caught in the ship's screws to transport it here?


Who cares ? I'm doing my bit for the economy by recklessly consuming. Of course if I can cause some disconnect by painting a Mercedes Kompressor with anti Busgh slogans, it's all the better. You wouldn't believe how many nice people wave at me on the freeway. Poor things don't seem to be using the whole hand all the time though. Best money I every spent for amusement value I have to say.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0