0
PhreeZone

Argus-aad?

Recommended Posts

Another product from Belgium, as it seems.
Here's the result of a WHOIS domain query of www.argus-aad.com:

G.V.C. BVBA
Leemveldstraat, 42
Overijse, N/A 3090
BE

Domain Name: ARGUS-AAD.COM

Administrative Contact:
Karel Goorts [email protected]
G.V.C. BVBA
Leemveldstraat, 42
Overijse, N/A 3090
BE
Phone: ***removed by poster***
Fax:
Technical Contact: yaddayaddayadda
The mind is like a parachute - it only works once it's open.
From the edge you just see more.
... Not every Swooper hooks & not every Hooker swoops ...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Another Belgian-made AAD?

This whole concept of being able to convert one AAD from student, to tandem, to expert with a few key strokes is a noble idea, but I would still prefer to make the conversion process only accessible to a rigger
i.e a screw in the side of the battery box that is only accessible when the container is open.
I just don't trust bored skydivers to leave well-enough-alone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

This whole concept of being able to convert one AAD from student, to tandem, to expert with a few key strokes is a noble idea, but I would still prefer to make the conversion process only accessible to a rigger
i.e a screw in the side of the battery box that is only accessible when the container is open.
I just don't trust bored skydivers to leave well-enough-alone.



For what it's worth, in ready mode the Vigil's LCD display tells you what jumper mode(Pro/Student/Tandem) it is in in large bolded letters. In fact, since the Vigil also has an LED to indicate status, the jumper mode is the only info displayed on the LCD when in ready mode. So it's really hard to not know whether you are in pro, student or tandem mode if you can read.

-Blind
"If you end up in an alligator's jaws, naked, you probably did something to deserve it."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
...Are its makers trying to claim too much? If you look at its website it claims to be the most reliable AAD. This may turn out to be correct but it is a pretty bold statement for a product which isn't even on the market yet and won't be on general release until the end of the year. You can imagine what the feedback will be if one unit fails especially given the furore which has dogged the Vigil.

What info have they got to back it up?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

This whole concept of being able to convert one AAD from student, to tandem, to expert with a few key strokes is a noble idea, but I would still prefer to make the conversion process only accessible to a rigger
i.e a screw in the side of the battery box that is only accessible when the container is open.
I just don't trust bored skydivers to leave well-enough-alone.




Hi Rob,
The Argus will be delivered in a single (Standard) mode -885ft (270 meters) at a fall rate of 78-mph (35 m/sec)-. It is optional to install - per mode – extra software for novice, tandem or swoop. Only than you will be able to convert between modes. BTW installing these extra modes is a rigger’s job.

The majority (±85%) of the skydivers will use the device in the Standard mode and will have no interest to install an extra mode. (Therefore will the majority of skydivers in a moment of boredom not be able to…)

Those who are interested in extending the number of modes might be skydiving schools, tandemmasters and hardcore swoopers. I.e. (semi-) professionals who are (just like the vast majority of all skydivers) aware that such devices are no toys.

Adjustment by altitude, language and readings (metric/feet) is possible in every mode (obvious).

Our utmost concern is parachuting safety (and this since 1993). Therefore we fully agree with you that making the conversion process only accessible to a rigger would be the best. However, the customer wants that (when more than one mode is installed), he/she can make the conversion by her/himself.

We’ve chosen for a solution somewhere in the middle by limiting access for a large percentage of the general skydiving community, who are not interested in an extra mode anyhow. (Perhaps with the exception to play with on rainy days…)

Bill Booth wrote in 2003 a nice article about the (conflicting) relation between parachuting safety and market demand (see link). I’m afraid that dilemmas like these will remain forever.

Greetz
WilliamB|
Project Argus

http://www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/safety/detail_page.cgi?ID=19

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

BTW installing these extra modes is a rigger’s job.



Nice idea.

Conversely, can a rigger remove the modes if the unit is to be sold to one of the "majority" who have no interest in the extra modes?

Quote

William
Project Argus



How come you have no AAD listed in your profile? Not eating your own dogfood? :-D
Skydiving Fatalities - Cease not to learn 'til thou cease to live

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Nice idea.

Conversely, can a rigger remove the modes if the unit is to be sold to one of the "majority" who have no interest in the extra modes?



If the customer wish so or local regulations demand that, yes.

Quote

How come you have no AAD listed in your profile? Not eating your own dogfood? :-D



Go to profiles and try to add a non listed aad.

William;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

...Are its makers trying to claim too much? .....If you look at its website it claims to be the most reliable AAD. This may turn out to be correct but it is a pretty bold statement



Hi Adrian,
I don’t think we are claiming too much. If you decide in this business (like in any other) to develop a certain product, your aim should be to make it superior to similar products that are already available. The “bold” statement is based upon what we want to achieve. So far the outcome of the tests with our prototypes makes us feel good.

For the coming 9 months you can -via the Argus Website- update yourself about where we stand. You will be informed about the testing programme and their outcome (our successes and –without any doubt- flaws). I don’t think flaws can be fully avoided (that’s where a testing phase is for), it is a matter how you handle them. We’ve chosen for transparency.

William

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

What are the parameters of the other modes?



Standard: 885ft (270 meters) at a fall rate of 78 mph (35 m/sec)

Novice: 1050 feet (320 meters) at a fall rate of 45 mph (20m/sec)

Tandem: 2050 feet (625meter) at a fall rate of 78 mph (35 m/sec)

Swoop: patent pending (I'll keep you informed about that one...)

William:ph34r:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

A real one in your rig or a theoretical one in your pocket ???



Real one in my rig (actually we have several)

Quote

How is it looking like ????



Not taking into account the improvements it looks like most aads that work according to the principle of cutting the loop (box, cutter, display).

Quote

Your website doesn't let out a secret !!!!!!!!



Correct. Next update 1 March 2005 (As we also wrote on the site.)

William

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

A real one in your rig or a theoretical one in your pocket ???



Real one in my rig (actually we have several)

Correct. Next update 1 March 2005 (As we also wrote on the site.)


looking forward for the update...

little question, your profile also says you jump in Maubeuge... Do they let you jump with a prototype ??
scissors beat paper, paper beat rock, rock beat wingsuit - KarlM

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

little question, your profile also says you jump in Maubeuge... Do they let you jump with a prototype ??



In France an aad is mandatory. There is however neither a type nor any aad norm set.

Obviously, jumping a prototype does not mean that you should do “regular” skydives with them. The safety of the aeroplane, fellow passengers and skydivers is your no 1 concern. (no relative work, students, tandem...)

FYI also in the past Maubeuge was used for several testing programmes (I took part in several of them).

Quote

looking forward for the update...


Thanks, we keep you informed

William

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well, it should not take much to avoid mistakes in PR like they happened in other cases, but that gets offtopic.

In an early phase like this, claims can be made as bold as they want to, because they can still work on it to meet the claim before the unit is on the market.

And doesn't every AAD claim to be the best/most reliable/most trusted?
The mind is like a parachute - it only works once it's open.
From the edge you just see more.
... Not every Swooper hooks & not every Hooker swoops ...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0