0
snafuhere

Canon KIT lens 18-55 (REBEL XT/350D)

Recommended Posts

i bought the rebel x about a year ago approx. 5000 shots no problems. so far I have only used the kit lens.....this year I will buy a canon 10-22.
this is a great cam for me under all conditions, so far. I use sports mode auto focus for tandems.
stay safe
jimoke
The ground always, remembers where you are!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Do a search and you'll find plenty of info on suggested settings.

But for a start use Tv mode with a shutter speed of around 1/500. You could also try Manual Focus set close to infinity (test the focus on the ground first).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I went with the kit lens for awhile but now have a Sigma 15mm lens. I set the focus and run mostly in TV with a shutter speed usually around 320. I think that is the setting I dont have the camera in front of me.

Dont usually have any Blurr issue and with the above settings (faster shutter on really bright days and maybe one step lower on the cloudy days) I have been getting some good shots!

Play around and fid what works best for you..

Scott C.
"He who Hesitates Shall Inherit the Earth!"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

First means BEER!!!!



thanks;)

I use sony pc350 with 0.3 diamond for video.
The frame diff between pictures taken with 18mm lens setting (28mm on 35) and my video is noticable only when I am very close to the subject.

so the kit lens works for me

https://www.facebook.com/1skydive/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
the second one's subject is just as blurred as the full frame's subject. i'm taking an educated guess that is because the subject actually makes up so little of the frame and many auto focus systems have trouble finding focus of a close subject with very wide lenses like the 15mm, etc...
matt

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

the second one's subject is just as blurred as the full frame's subject



would manual focus (and high aperture help)?
or is it the not-so-good-lens?
====

actually half of the pictures I've taken are not sharp
often second plan is sharper then the main subject
anything wrong about the camera? am I missing something important?

https://www.facebook.com/1skydive/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
interesting airplane.....:)(first picture...exit shot...)

high wing twin,,,, with retractable gear...
what is it??... Dornier???? how many jumpers does it carry??

why wouldn't the pilot leave the gear stowed
on jump run???
is airspeed a factor??? i'd imagine there is lots more drag...with the gear extended.....
but surely the pilot can throttle back and add some flaps instead of cycling the gear........right????
jmy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
the more i think about the picture the more i believe there is both motion blurr from a slightly slow aperture and an autofocus issue.
to really know i'd like to see the original file with the metadata so i could see what setting the camera was on.

Quote

would manual focus (and high aperture help)?


high aperture would give you a greater depth of field, but still won't fix the focus problem if the camera isn't focusing on the only thing in the sky besides the horizon.[:/]
Quote

or is it the not-so-good-lens?


it's not so much the lens as probably the combination of settings and your distance from the subject.
being closer to the subject would definitely help because then the person would fill more of the frame and the autofocus would have a better chance at getting it right. it just seems like the camera figured that the background was the most consistent area so it focused to that.

i don't know the canon camera well enough to say if it has a feature like the nikons do called "closest subject" in the autofocus menus. if it does i'd give that a try. in theory it should focus on the closest subject which would be your HD friend rather then the background.:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Some other things to consider, is your helmet nice and tight (no shake), are you useing a BITE switch (I used to bite hard and flinch causing camera shake, now I use :P switch), also, I pick my shots (not hold down the switch) and I make sure I am well placed and in a solid steady body position.

I don't take as many pictures as other camera folks, but most of mine are very good (IMHO).

Also, because of your .3 to 28mm differance, I would fly in for the Vid and then back out for the stills (I have done this for years).

Hang in there and have fun!!!

Stay Safe,

Arvel
BSBD...........Its all about Respect,

USPA#-7062, FB-2197, Outlaw 499

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
settings of the picture attached

the camera was in sports auto-mode
which is basically iso-400, ai-focus (continous focusing and predicting moving subject distance)

I was using tounge switch
helmet is tight
I belive I'm pretty stable

I bought the camera 3 days ago
many of the pictures I have taken on the ground are out of focus
maybe it's me not experienced, but I do know something about photograpy
my previous digital was olympus 5060 'prosumer compact' - the pictures were great

https://www.facebook.com/1skydive/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Senn as I had the same camera and lens; try these settings.

in TV mode, set the shutter speed to around 250 / 300. Depending on how bright the sky is. Take a few practice shots of the sky from the ground and see what you like best. I wouldn't go anywhere below 250, that's blur territory.

Use Manual focus, back the lens down to it's widest, then focus on somehting on the ground, which is the same distance as you'll be shooting at in the air.

As someone else said, don't keep your tongue presed down on the switch, focus on taking individual shots.

Also, put a couple of elastic bands / tape around the zoom and focus on the lens, the focus gets knocked and moved about easily on the kit lens.

Then come back and tell us how it's going :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
yer thought 100 was the trend. I use the same.
I was told by someone that 400 was good, I don't know of any down sides to 100ISO but I know 400 has them (eg. Noise) thats why I was wondering.
I've noticed some pics shot at higher ISO's look shit (basically) on high temp shots, at full resolution.

On an average for me, I use AV and shoot:
18mm Focal
5.5-6.2f/
100 ISO
and normally get a Shutter Speed of about 1000-1250 (bright days)

Cheers,
Jason.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0