0
akarunway

Wing loading

Recommended Posts

I was always told there was no such thing as a stupid question so here goes. Out the door = you and total gear. Once you deploy your main shouldn't your wing loading be caculated - your main
I hold it true, whate'er befall;
I feel it, when I sorrow most;
'Tis better to have loved and lost
Than never to have loved at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
hmm didnt think about that when I ordered my big reserve.....guess I'll have plenty of time to on the long slow canopy ride down on that bass ass reserve when ( and I think thats the right mentality rather than if...) I have to chop !!;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It's no different than calculating the wing loading of a plane. Since most planes store their fuel in the wings, they're a very significant percentage of the weight of the plane. Wouldn't make any sense to leave them out of the calculation.

Dave

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

The main is included; it has to support its own weight, after all.



I see what you are saying about the chute carrying its own weight, however, the weight that matters in wingloading of a chute - that is the weight that affects the performance - is the suspended weight right? The suspended weight (you and rig minus main) is what affects turn rate and dive of the canopy. Sooo even though we are only talking about 6 or so pounds, I think that the effective wingloading should not technically include the main. Does this make sense?
Flying Hellfish #470

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>I see what you are saying about the chute carrying its own weight,
> however, the weight that matters in wingloading of a chute - that is
> the weight that affects the performance - is the suspended weight right?

No. A canopy must generate enough lift to counter the entire weight of the system; there's no aerodynamic 'trick' that allows the weight of the wing to not be supported by this lift. If you doubled the weight of the canopy (say from 6 pounds to 12) the performance of the canopy would change a bit; it would be similar to what happens when you add 6 pounds of weight in a weight belt, at least in a steady glide.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Of course.

Additionally, when measuring my total body weight, if I'm standing up I dont include the weight of my legs.
Since they are holding me up their mass doesnt count :S:SB|



So a fat-ass obese person who's sit-flying can exclude the weight of their ass?
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

>I see what you are saying about the chute carrying its own weight,
> however, the weight that matters in wingloading of a chute - that is
> the weight that affects the performance - is the suspended weight right?

No. A canopy must generate enough lift to counter the entire weight of the system; there's no aerodynamic 'trick' that allows the weight of the wing to not be supported by this lift. If you doubled the weight of the canopy (say from 6 pounds to 12) the performance of the canopy would change a bit; it would be similar to what happens when you add 6 pounds of weight in a weight belt, at least in a steady glide.





Amen.:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's free!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
0