0
mixedup

what units do Europe/others use for canopy size/wingloading?

Recommended Posts

curious as to whether other countries use as typical units for canopy size & wing loading? i.e. do they use

- canopy size: ft² (i.e. or do they quote their canopies in discussion by m²)

- wing loading: lbs/ft² (assume they'd have to for this one by definition? )
Parachutist Game IOS Android YouT

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
lbs/sqft² is generally accepted throughout the world as the way to compare and discuss wingloading at least in skydiving.
Even the russians accepted this standart after the fall of the iron curtain.
But I do wonder, whether they (not only the russians ;) ) use different units in other parts of aviation (e.g. wingloading of a plane?!)

One of the most common internet-tools here in germany to calculate your wingloading for your specific canopy size does offer kg/m² also though

http://www.flyfirebird.com/catalog/information.php/info_id/14
-------------------------------------------------------

To absent friends

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks for that calculator link.
Was just pretty shocked by the classification of wingloadings.
Quote

Rough overview about significant loads:
Students:
< 1,1
lbs / sqft
Beginners:
1,1 - 1,5
lbs / sqft
Advanced Pilots:
1,5 - 2,0
lbs / sqft
Pro-Pilots:
2,0 - 2,4
lbs / sqft
Aerobatic Pilots:
2,4 - 2,8
lbs / sqft


scissors beat paper, paper beat rock, rock beat wingsuit - KarlM

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Me too!
According to Sofpidarf there should be no such thing as "intermediate wingloading" after your third jump.
A a general rule I would assume everything above 100 sqft too dangerous to jump. As always... Power first, Controle second!!

;);)B|;);)

All jokes asside:
These are not the official recommondations for wingloadings in Germany and they do state also that if in doubt bigger is better and the wrong canopy size puts not only your bones but your life at risk...

-------------------------------------------------------

To absent friends

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's all about the definition of the words - student, beginner, advanced, pro and aerobatic.

It's the same old story as when you look at mc owners. Many are those riding litre sports bikes, but only a handful knows how to ride them proper or even get 50% of their true potential and are better off with a weaker bike. Same thing in skydiving, and the same kind of people most likely...

Flying a canopy at 2.0+ WL and being honest about your current skill level as a canopy pilot are two completely different things for many jumpers maybe me included. [:/]

Sorry for going out of topic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Bufobufo

It's all about the definition of the words - student, beginner, advanced, pro and aerobatic.

It's the same old story as when you look at mc owners. Many are those riding litre sports bikes, but only a handful knows how to ride them proper or even get 50% of their true potential and are better off with a weaker bike. Same thing in skydiving, and the same kind of people most likely...

Flying a canopy at 2.0+ WL and being honest about your current skill level as a canopy pilot are two completely different things for many jumpers maybe me included. [:/]

Sorry for going out of topic.



The diference is that a highly loaded canopy will still have the same groundspeed at a glide; a motorcycle with a litre engine can be driven as a docile machine.
You are not the contents of your wallet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
piisfish

Thanks for that calculator link.
Was just pretty shocked by the classification of wingloadings.

Quote

Rough overview about significant loads:
Students:
< 1,1
lbs / sqft
Beginners:
1,1 - 1,5
lbs / sqft
Advanced Pilots:
1,5 - 2,0
lbs / sqft
Pro-Pilots:
2,0 - 2,4
lbs / sqft
Aerobatic Pilots:
2,4 - 2,8
lbs / sqft



Most of those numbers are reasonable, with the exception that most schools will only allow first (solo) students to jump canopies loaded around 0.7 pounds per square foot.

Similarly, precision landing competitors and BASE jumpers usually limit their wing-ladings to around 0.7.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
lyosha

I was expecting some metric units in the mix at least... like kg/m or something... a little surprised Europe got stuck with our ass-backwards American ways on this one. :P



Life can sure be a bitch at times. [:/]

Sparky
My idea of a fair fight is clubbing baby seals

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DrDom



The diference is that a highly loaded canopy will still have the same groundspeed at a glide; a motorcycle with a litre engine can be driven as a docile machine.



I'm not going to immerse myself on your thoughts about ground speed, glide and what not, you kind of lost me there. The analogy you use on bikes still applies on canopies.

Right now you think there is a huge difference since flying HP canopies at 1,5-2,0lb/sqf seems distant, but once you get more jumps and experience under your belt you might not be as eager to disagree and maybe you even start to notice some similarities;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0