2 2
JoeWeber

Christians don’t believe in Democracy

Recommended Posts

(edited)
28 minutes ago, jakee said:

Yeah… the thing is Only a couple of days ago you were very keen on us knowing that you “once also did not believe”. you brought it up because you want us to know that you get where we’re coming from and you’ve been there too. But you haven’t. You were never an atheist. You always believed. You are not and were not ever the same. If you think (as you appear to, and as many of you cohorts do) that you’re just further along the same sliding scale of attitudes to Jesus as we are, you couldn’t be more wrong.

 

 

I should have worded that differently. I differentiate knowing from belief, in the context of what we're speaking. Belief implies obedience. Knowledge is just that. In that sense, I once did not believe. I have always had a sense, as I shared in my personal testimony earlier, that there must be a God. However, I was absolutely not obedient to that knowledge. As a matter of fact, I suppressed it. I did not "believe" in the biblical sense. There is "Common Grace" and "Special Grace" which exist with God. "Common Grace" allows for the rain, if you will, to fall on both non-believers and believers alike, including enjoyment of creation, restraint by God on the effect of sin, delayed judgment, general knowledge of "a god," etc.) "Special Grace" is specific, in the knowledge of the person and work of Jesus Christ described in scripture. It demands not just knowledge, but obedience.

Edited by jaybird18c

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, jaybird18c said:

I expanded on my thought above. Sorry about that. I believe decisions should be made democratically within our representative form of government. If you look at it the other way around, there are states in which very non-Christian principals are applied and "forced on believers," as you put it. That's America. Vote wisely!

How does allowing something that you don't believe in, and don't plan to do yourself, "force" it on you? Or is it the tolerance htat's forced?

Wendy P.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, wmw999 said:

How does allowing something that you don't believe in, and don't plan to do yourself, "force" it on you? Or is it the tolerance htat's forced?

Wendy P.

Hi Wendy,

This is exactly how I feel.  While I am pro-abortion ( I donate to NARAL every year ), I have never told someone to get an abortion.  Although, there are times when I think I should have.  :)

I am a 'live & let live' type of person.

Jerry Baumchen

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, wmw999 said:

How does allowing something that you don't believe in, and don't plan to do yourself, "force" it on you? Or is it the tolerance htat's forced?

Wendy P.

I was just using the same verbiage as Kallend in my response about representative government. He used the word imposed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, JerryBaumchen said:

Hi Wendy,

This is exactly how I feel.  While I am pro-abortion ( I donate to NARAL every year ), I have never told someone to get an abortion.  Although, there are times when I think I should have.  :)

I am a 'live & let live' type of person.

Jerry Baumchen

If you want to live in a state which allows killing babies, move to Kalifornia. Problem solved...for you, that is. Not so much for the baby.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, jaybird18c said:

There is "Common Grace" and "Special Grace" which exist with God. "Common Grace" allows for the rain, if you will, to fall on both non-believers and believers alike, including enjoyment of creation, restraint by God on the effect of sin, delayed judgment, general knowledge of "a god," etc.) "Special Grace" is specific, in the knowledge of the person and work of Jesus Christ described in scripture. It demands not just knowledge, but obedience.

I really love this about theology. Complicated explanations about simple things. Theologians and lawyers, kill them all. Kill them tonight. Unless it's my lawyer and she gets me off on a technicality. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, gowlerk said:

I really love this about theology. Complicated explanations about simple things. Theologians and lawyers, kill them all. Kill them tonight. Unless it's my lawyer and she gets me off on a technicality. 

Who says that? You? There you go, generalizing again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
(edited)
15 minutes ago, gowlerk said:

Sez the guy who just spouted off about baby killers. Dehumanizing people is sometimes called "basic training".

 

Is it generalizing to say that people who commit murder are in fact murderers?

Edited by jaybird18c

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, jaybird18c said:

If you want to live in a state which allows killing babies, move to Kalifornia. Problem solved...for you, that is. Not so much for the baby.

Amen. Better to live in a state that allows killing mothers in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, jaybird18c said:

Is it generalizing to say that people who commit murder are in fact murderers?

How many funerals for pregnancies that didn't reach the point of showing have you been to? Ever tried to buy a casket for a missed period?  Are you in favor of someone whose brain isn't functioning having life support withdrawn? These are some (ill)logical extensions of considering the moment of conception to be a full-up human being. Are you in favor of supporting the babies of someone who was impregnated because birth control failed? Or is it just their tough luck, and women should keep their legs together -- while men call them prick teases.

Wendy P.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, wmw999 said:

How many funerals for pregnancies that didn't reach the point of showing have you been to? Ever tried to buy a casket for a missed period?  Are you in favor of someone whose brain isn't functioning having life support withdrawn? These are some (ill)logical extensions of considering the moment of conception to be a full-up human being. Are you in favor of supporting the babies of someone who was impregnated because birth control failed? Or is it just their tough luck, and women should keep their legs together -- while men call them prick teases.

Wendy P.

I guess however you have to justify it to sit right with your conscience.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, jakee said:

So are you a murderer?

C'mon Jakee. You know full well that if you are a soldier and sanctioned by your government then killing the enemy is not murder. It is "justified killing". I guess however you have to justify it to sit right with your conscience.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jay, it looks like you’re getting angry. I’m not an atheist, and those were honest questions I asked. Because those are real-world situations I described. Not all of them have applied to me (which, if any, is my business). But they all happen.

Wendy P. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, jaybird18c said:

Opinions are like assholes…like the one you evolved.

When you hold that a pin head size assemblage of cells a day old is a baby and removing it is murder you are holding an empty bag, in the evolved opinion of this asshole.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, wmw999 said:

Jay, it looks like you’re getting angry. I’m not an atheist, and those were honest questions I asked. Because those are real-world situations I described. Not all of them have applied to me (which, if any, is my business). But they all happen.

Wendy P. 

Indeed he is, but given his extended and timely willingness to stay engaged here -and take a few shots along the way- I respectfully request that a little extra wiggle room be afforded. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, gowlerk said:

C'mon Jakee. You know full well that if you are a soldier and sanctioned by your government then killing the enemy is not murder. It is "justified killing". I guess however you have to justify it to sit right with your conscience.

You mean, just like legal abortion isn’t murder? I wonder if Jay realises it works both ways.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

2 2