Amazon 7 #1 May 24, 2015 . Contemplating navels Anyone care to explain??? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 212 #2 May 24, 2015 Amazon. Contemplating navels Anyone care to explain??? Well, you start with some horse hair, iot some other animal hair, and a stick. You bind the hair to the stick, which becomes a brush. Next, you mix berries, some ashes, and different other colored powder with turpentine, or various other chemicals. Of course, canvas or linen is stretched across a frame, and when you combine all of these elements, and some imagination, with some ability, you end up with renderings that are a representation of the artists desire to convey. Sometimes it is as simple as a bowl of fruit or a sunset. Sometimes the renderings are much mor complex. I believe it is called "a painting"I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #3 May 24, 2015 turtlespeed***. Contemplating navels Anyone care to explain??? Well, you start with some horse hair, iot some other animal hair, and a stick. You bind the hair to the stick, which becomes a brush. Next, you mix berries, some ashes, and different other colored powder with turpentine, or various other chemicals. Of course, canvas or linen is stretched across a frame, and when you combine all of these elements, and some imagination, with some ability, you end up with renderings that are a representation of the artists desire to convey. Sometimes it is as simple as a bowl of fruit or a sunset. Sometimes the renderings are much mor complex. I believe it is called "a painting" Since many of those paintings were financed under the patronage of THE CHURCH Should not the Cardinals have intervened and had the artists comply with church dogma??? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
champu 1 #4 May 24, 2015 Nit-picking the finer points of a wholly preposterous story is kinda dumb. If a god supposedly whipped up two people up out of thin air and ribs how much more of a stretch are navels? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 212 #5 May 24, 2015 Amazon******. Contemplating navels Anyone care to explain??? Well, you start with some horse hair, iot some other animal hair, and a stick. You bind the hair to the stick, which becomes a brush. Next, you mix berries, some ashes, and different other colored powder with turpentine, or various other chemicals. Of course, canvas or linen is stretched across a frame, and when you combine all of these elements, and some imagination, with some ability, you end up with renderings that are a representation of the artists desire to convey. Sometimes it is as simple as a bowl of fruit or a sunset. Sometimes the renderings are much mor complex. I believe it is called "a painting" Since many of those paintings were financed under the patronage of THE CHURCH Should not the Cardinals have intervened and had the artists comply with church dogma??? What was the church dogma at that point in history?I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 212 #6 May 24, 2015 champuNit-picking the finer points of a wholly preposterous story is kinda dumb. If a god supposedly whipped up two people up out of thin air and ribs how much more of a stretch are navels? I believe the subject is the forbidden show of the navel.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #7 May 24, 2015 turtlespeed*********. Contemplating navels Anyone care to explain??? Well, you start with some horse hair, iot some other animal hair, and a stick. You bind the hair to the stick, which becomes a brush. Next, you mix berries, some ashes, and different other colored powder with turpentine, or various other chemicals. Of course, canvas or linen is stretched across a frame, and when you combine all of these elements, and some imagination, with some ability, you end up with renderings that are a representation of the artists desire to convey. Sometimes it is as simple as a bowl of fruit or a sunset. Sometimes the renderings are much mor complex. I believe it is called "a painting" Since many of those paintings were financed under the patronage of THE CHURCH Should not the Cardinals have intervened and had the artists comply with church dogma??? What was the church dogma at that point in history? Genesis is the start.... the Cardinals in earlier days had approved its addition to their version.. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 18 #8 May 24, 2015 champuNit-picking the finer points of a wholly preposterous story is kinda dumb. If a god supposedly whipped up two people up out of thin air and ribs how much more of a stretch are navels? Eh... Her comments are usually short sighted She forgets the gov funded a cross in a jar of piss.... So, does that make the gov anti christian?"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 212 #9 May 24, 2015 Amazon************. Contemplating navels Anyone care to explain??? Well, you start with some horse hair, iot some other animal hair, and a stick. You bind the hair to the stick, which becomes a brush. Next, you mix berries, some ashes, and different other colored powder with turpentine, or various other chemicals. Of course, canvas or linen is stretched across a frame, and when you combine all of these elements, and some imagination, with some ability, you end up with renderings that are a representation of the artists desire to convey. Sometimes it is as simple as a bowl of fruit or a sunset. Sometimes the renderings are much mor complex. I believe it is called "a painting" Since many of those paintings were financed under the patronage of THE CHURCH Should not the Cardinals have intervened and had the artists comply with church dogma??? What was the church dogma at that point in history? Genesis is the start.... the Cardinals in earlier days had approved its addition to their version.. You are being pretty ambiguous.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 212 #10 May 24, 2015 rushmc***Nit-picking the finer points of a wholly preposterous story is kinda dumb. If a god supposedly whipped up two people up out of thin air and ribs how much more of a stretch are navels? Eh... Her comments are usually short sighted She forgets the gov funded a cross in a jar of piss.... So, does that make the gov anti christian? Well it is either that Adam and Eve didn't need belly buttons, because they weren't born, they were created. And if they were created in gods image, why does God have a belly button? That would suggest that God has a mommy and daddy.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
champu 1 #11 May 24, 2015 Having a navel doesn't actually say anything about having a father or not. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #12 May 24, 2015 rushmc ***Nit-picking the finer points of a wholly preposterous story is kinda dumb. If a god supposedly whipped up two people up out of thin air and ribs how much more of a stretch are navels? Eh... Her comments are usually short sighted She forgets the gov funded a cross in a jar of piss.... So, does that make the gov anti christian? Where in the first Amendment is that not allowed??? I do not remember seeing any clause in our constitution about such a thing. Are you arguing for A Christian form of Sharia??? It is unfortunate to see a direct jump to playing the player though please don't Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 212 #13 May 24, 2015 champuHaving a navel doesn't actually say anything about having a father or not. No, I suppose it doesn't, so it is still suggesting a birth of some kind.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #14 May 24, 2015 champuHaving a navel doesn't actually say anything about having a father or not. SO,, then our God as seen in the movie Dogma was right then.... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 212 #15 May 24, 2015 Amazon***Having a navel doesn't actually say anything about having a father or not. SO,, then our God as seen in the movie Dogma was right then.... Our God? Yes, Cheryl Crow is God,I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
muff528 3 #16 May 24, 2015 Amazon. Contemplating navels Anyone care to explain??? I think Rubens was always looking for an excuse to draw boobies. I'm pretty sure that it was an inside joke among the painters we now call "the Masters". They had a not-so-secret, friendly competition among themselves to see who could get the most pictures of nikked folks displayed inside of churches. Also, they couldn't find any models without belly buttons ...and they didn't have Photoshop back then. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
champu 1 #17 May 24, 2015 turtlespeedYes, Cheryl Crow is God, Either way, cover your ears. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
aphid 0 #18 May 24, 2015 turtlespeed******Having a navel doesn't actually say anything about having a father or not. SO,, then our God as seen in the movie Dogma was right then.... Our God? Yes, Cheryl Crow is God, Actually, she (God) was portrayed by Canadian singer Alanis Morissette. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BIGUN 1,053 #19 May 24, 2015 Renaissance painters..... heathens!!!!!!!!!!!! Nobody has time to listen; because they're desperately chasing the need of being heard. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #20 May 24, 2015 BIGUN Renaissance painters..... heathens!!!!!!!!!!!! How did they get away with that.... they could have kept some inquisitors busy for decades Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wolfriverjoe 1,340 #21 May 24, 2015 aphid*********Having a navel doesn't actually say anything about having a father or not. SO,, then our God as seen in the movie Dogma was right then.... Our God? Yes, Sheryl Crow is God, Actually, she (God) was portrayed by Canadian singer Alanis Morissette. And Bud Cort in the beginning (at the pier when the Stygian Triplets attacked)."There are NO situations which do not call for a French Maid outfit." Lucky McSwervy "~ya don't GET old by being weak & stupid!" - Airtwardo Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 212 #22 May 24, 2015 aphid*********Having a navel doesn't actually say anything about having a father or not. SO,, then our God as seen in the movie Dogma was right then.... Our God? Yes, Cheryl Crow is God, Actually, she (God) was portrayed by Canadian singer Alanis Morissette. Yes, yes, I forgot that God is Canadian, eh.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jclalor 12 #23 May 24, 2015 The lesser told story of Adam and Eve: Adam, was very lonely after being created. He asked God to provide a companion, someone that could keep him company in paradise, he ask God that they be intelligent, beautiful, and loving, God said that he could do this, but it would cost Adam one of his legs. Adam thought about it for a brief moment... And said "mehhh, what could I get for a single rib?" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites