Arvoitus 1 #26 September 25, 2013 masterrig *********Didnt JC also say something about teaching a man to fish? Yes, He did. The problem now is, the animal rights folks don't want you fishing or hunting. If you go dumpster diving, you get accused of digging into peoples 'privacy'. About the only other choice is road-kill. Chuck In many places, harvesting after a road-kill is illegal. In MD, it's considered poaching unless you obtain a Road Kill Tag for it. One would have to get a 'Road Kill Tag' first? Isn't that like 'self incrimination' and showing intent you intend to hunt with your vehicle? Chuck I though that it worked like so that if a deer gets hit by a car then the cops have a list to of people, the people with the tags, to call to come and pick up the carcass.Your rights end where my feelings begin. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
masterrig 1 #27 September 25, 2013 oldwomanc6 ************Didnt JC also say something about teaching a man to fish? Yes, He did. The problem now is, the animal rights folks don't want you fishing or hunting. If you go dumpster diving, you get accused of digging into peoples 'privacy'. About the only other choice is road-kill. Chuck In many places, harvesting after a road-kill is illegal. In MD, it's considered poaching unless you obtain a Road Kill Tag for it. One would have to get a 'Road Kill Tag' first? Isn't that like 'self incrimination' and showing intent you intend to hunt with your vehicle? Chuck Well, there's bow season and gun season; maybe's there's a car season? Well, that's a new one on me! That might be the 'real' reason for pick-up grill-guards! Chuck Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
masterrig 1 #28 September 25, 2013 Arvoitus ************Didnt JC also say something about teaching a man to fish? Yes, He did. The problem now is, the animal rights folks don't want you fishing or hunting. If you go dumpster diving, you get accused of digging into peoples 'privacy'. About the only other choice is road-kill. Chuck In many places, harvesting after a road-kill is illegal. In MD, it's considered poaching unless you obtain a Road Kill Tag for it. One would have to get a 'Road Kill Tag' first? Isn't that like 'self incrimination' and showing intent you intend to hunt with your vehicle? Chuck I though that it worked like so that if a deer gets hit by a car then the cops have a list to of people, the people with the tags, to call to come and pick up the carcass. It's really, to confiscate your vehicle as a 'deadly weapon of mass destruction'! Chuck Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 1,679 #29 September 25, 2013 Of course, the Tea Party would object to Jesus feeding the poor, even if it only took a few loaves and fishes (the Biblical equivalent of Food Stamps).... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rehmwa 2 #30 September 25, 2013 kallend Of course, the Tea Party would object to Jesus feeding the poor, even if it only took a few loaves and fishes (the Biblical equivalent of Food Stamps). You are absolutely correct. Nice example of how liberals think: Jesus collected what little food a few people still had, barely enough for a few families, and then suddenly, POOOFF!!! everyone got to eat their fill it's a great example of liberal logic and how religious (blind faith in government instead of a mystical fairy creature is still blind faith) and superstitious they really are deep down If the original food owners then got belittled and called names and were given no food in return, then it would be perfect ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jgoose71 0 #31 September 25, 2013 kallend Of course, the Tea Party would object to Jesus feeding the poor, even if it only took a few loaves and fishes (the Biblical equivalent of Food Stamps). Typically, Tea Parties and Conservatives give more than liberals. Conservatives give more to charities while liberals it seems support taxes so the government gets more to give, then tries to cheat there way out of paying (How many tax scandals has Wrangle been involved in?) Of course, a quick google search supports the conservative generosity claim: http://abcnews.go.com/2020/story?id=2682730&page=1 Google it your self and check the results... And yes, conservatives would support Jesus, they still believe in him, most likely because he wasn't a government official. I think he falls more under the "Religious Organization or Charity" definition than "government program." If I remember rightly, a local council (Government) tried him, convicted him, then turned him over to the Romans for Crucifixion... (Probably a liberal Jewish council made up of so called "scholars" and what not)"There is an art, it says, or, rather, a knack to flying. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss." Life, the Universe, and Everything Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rickjump1 0 #32 September 25, 2013 kallend Of course, the Tea Party would object to Jesus feeding the poor, even if it only took a few loaves and fishes (the Biblical equivalent of Food Stamps). Why would they object?Do your part for global warming: ban beans and hold all popcorn farts. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jclalor 12 #33 September 25, 2013 IagoDidnt JC also say something about teaching a man to fish? I don't recall ever making such a statement. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rehmwa 2 #34 September 25, 2013 rickjump1*** Of course, the Tea Party would object to Jesus feeding the poor, even if it only took a few loaves and fishes (the Biblical equivalent of Food Stamps). Why would they object? John is equating a (presumed) deity with government. It's the psychology. ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rehmwa 2 #35 September 25, 2013 jclalor ***Didnt JC also say something about teaching a man to fish? I don't recall ever making such a statement. i could see you saying it - with conviction, and subtle undertones of scorn, humor, and wryness ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DanG 1 #36 September 25, 2013 QuoteTypically, Tea Parties and Conservatives give more than liberals. We've hashed this out here many times. If you count giving to your church as charitable giving, then you're right. Of course, is it really charitable to give money so the church can buy the pastor a new Caddy? - Dan G Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 212 #37 September 25, 2013 DanG Quote Typically, Tea Parties and Conservatives give more than liberals. We've hashed this out here many times. If you count giving to your church as charitable giving, then you're right. Of course, is it really charitable to give money so the church can buy the pastor a new Caddy? What is it that your ilk say about Obama Care . . . Its for the greater good. the minor discrepancies will always be there.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DanG 1 #38 September 25, 2013 QuoteWhat is it that your ilk say about Obama Care ... I don't have an ilk. I do, however, enjoy milk. I think elk are really amazing creatures. Ilk? No interest. - Dan G Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 212 #39 September 25, 2013 DanG Quote What is it that your ilk say about Obama Care ... I don't have an ilk. I do, however, enjoy milk. I think elk are really amazing creatures. Ilk? No interest. Ah - but your posting history tells a different story.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 1,679 #40 September 25, 2013 rickjump1*** Of course, the Tea Party would object to Jesus feeding the poor, even if it only took a few loaves and fishes (the Biblical equivalent of Food Stamps). Why would they object? Because they, and their faction of the GOP, have become the Party of Mean as well as the Party of No and the Stupid Party (C) 2013 GOP Gov. Bobby Jindal news.yahoo.com/jindal-gop-must-stop-being-stupid-party-014220693--election.html.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jgoose71 0 #41 September 26, 2013 kallend ****** Of course, the Tea Party would object to Jesus feeding the poor, even if it only took a few loaves and fishes (the Biblical equivalent of Food Stamps). Why would they object? Because they, and their faction of the GOP, have become the Party of Mean as well as the Party of No and the Stupid Party (C) 2013 GOP Gov. Bobby Jindal news.yahoo.com/jindal-gop-must-stop-being-stupid-party-014220693--election.html. Your saying the party of Bill Maher is the party of "Nice" and "Inclusion?" John Stewart did a show on that, let's see how it went...http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/wed-september-5-2012/hope-and-change-2---the-party-of-inclusion Boy, times have changed..."There is an art, it says, or, rather, a knack to flying. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss." Life, the Universe, and Everything Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rickjump1 0 #42 September 26, 2013 kallend ****** Of course, the Tea Party would object to Jesus feeding the poor, even if it only took a few loaves and fishes (the Biblical equivalent of Food Stamps). Why would they object? Because they, and their faction of the GOP, have become the Party of Mean as well as the Party of No and the Stupid Party (C) 2013 GOP Gov. Bobby Jindal news.yahoo.com/jindal-gop-must-stop-being-stupid-party-014220693--election.html. These are definitely "different" times, professor. Better stock up on guns, ammo, and vote and pray with the rest of us. The British are coming.Do your part for global warming: ban beans and hold all popcorn farts. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 1,679 #43 September 26, 2013 rickjump1 ********* Of course, the Tea Party would object to Jesus feeding the poor, even if it only took a few loaves and fishes (the Biblical equivalent of Food Stamps). Why would they object? Because they, and their faction of the GOP, have become the Party of Mean as well as the Party of No and the Stupid Party (C) 2013 GOP Gov. Bobby Jindal news.yahoo.com/jindal-gop-must-stop-being-stupid-party-014220693--election.html. These are definitely "different" times, professor. Better stock up on guns, ammo, and vote and pray with the rest of us. The British are coming.They are indeed different times. I doubt that Eisenhower or Reagan would recognize their party after its take-over by the extreme right.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 18 #44 September 26, 2013 kallend ************ Of course, the Tea Party would object to Jesus feeding the poor, even if it only took a few loaves and fishes (the Biblical equivalent of Food Stamps). Why would they object? Because they, and their faction of the GOP, have become the Party of Mean as well as the Party of No and the Stupid Party (C) 2013 GOP Gov. Bobby Jindal news.yahoo.com/jindal-gop-must-stop-being-stupid-party-014220693--election.html. These are definitely "different" times, professor. Better stock up on guns, ammo, and vote and pray with the rest of us. The British are coming.They are indeed different times. I doubt that Eisenhower or Reagan would recognize their party after its take-over by the extreme right. I will ask you since no one else has answered Where has the Republican party moved to the right?"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 1,679 #45 September 26, 2013 rushmc Where has the Republican party moved to the right? You're not serious, are you?... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 18 #46 September 26, 2013 kallend *** Where has the Republican party moved to the right? You're not serious, are you? I am serious where has this party MOVED to the right?"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 1,679 #47 September 26, 2013 rushmc ****** Where has the Republican party moved to the right? You're not serious, are you? I am serious where has this party MOVED to the right? When it welcomed the T-E-A P-A-R-T-Y into its ranks. It now has an anti-woman, anti-gay, anti-immigrant, anti-science, anti-poor, anti-minority, anti-intellectual agenda. It now opposes programs it supported or even created a few decades ago (EPA, OSHA...).... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 18 #48 September 26, 2013 kallend ********* Where has the Republican party moved to the right? You're not serious, are you? I am serious where has this party MOVED to the right? When it welcomed the T-E-A P-A-R-T-Y into its ranks. It now has an anti-woman, anti-gay, anti-immigrant, anti-science, anti-poor, anti-minority, anti-intellectual agenda. It now opposes programs it supported or even created a few decades ago (EPA, OSHA...). where have they moved? Your hate speach has evolved but where has the party moved?"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 1,679 #49 September 26, 2013 rushmc ************ Where has the Republican party moved to the right? You're not serious, are you? I am serious where has this party MOVED to the right? When it welcomed the T-E-A P-A-R-T-Y into its ranks. It now has an anti-woman, anti-gay, anti-immigrant, anti-science, anti-poor, anti-minority, anti-intellectual agenda. It now opposes programs it supported or even created a few decades ago (EPA, OSHA...). where have they moved? Your hate speach has evolved but where has the party moved? For those that can't tell their left from right.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 18 #50 September 27, 2013 I am glad you found some help understanding You needed it I will ask again Show me where the Republican party has MOVED to the right"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites