War Against Whites...Think it isnt real?

[billvon 2,450]

>Especially the ones with the little burros. They SAY they are only coming here to pick fruit . . .

And they always end up picking coffee beans. Liars.

[regulator 0]

Gravitymaster

This is why we need guns.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UEqa90XpPw0

[Gravitymaster 0]

http://www.snopes.com/politics/crime/roderickscott.asp

[wmw999 2,163]

There's a war on whites, there's a war on blacks, there's a war on hispanics, there's a war on Jews, on non-Christians, on Christians -- pick your war.

The ones that worry me the most are the ones that "authorities" engage in, because they are less likely to have the power of the law to help fight.

All of them are about tribalism and discrimination. Which is, of course, human nature. Sometimes our republic is really just a way to get people to go against their baser human nature, isn't it

Wendy P.

There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown)

[OHCHUTE 0]

billvon

>OK, how EXACTLY is Obama "taking from those who have more" then?

It's boilerplate for such posts. He probably isn't even aware he's doing it. Wealth redistribution, socialism, class warfare, etc etc.

Who are you kidding he doesn't know what he is doing. You voted for him not on the basis he was a mubbling fool.
OBAMACARE clearly shows his interest in taking from working people and giving to poor, including poor small businesses that are forced to make cuts to working hours since they can't afford to pay the healthcare bill. In case you've not noticed: it's now all all about the African American. This weekend in DC will advocate: there's more to do, and "we have a long way to go."

Perhaps we should fill those free school backpacks with cash, so they don't even have to go to school!

[billvon 2,450]

> . . . mubbling fool. .. . OBAMACARE . . . poor small businesses . . .all about the
>African American. . . .fill those free school backpacks with cash . . . .

You forgot Benghazi and Bill Ayers.

[Kennedy 0]

It must be like looking into a mirror for certain posters (you know, equal but reversed). Of course, nobody expects any better from chute...

witty subliminal message
Guard your honor, let your reputation fall where it will, and outlast the bastards.
1*

[Andy9o8 0]

wmw999

There's a war on whites, there's a war on blacks, there's a war on hispanics, there's a war on Jews, on non-Christians, on Christians -- pick your war.

The ones that worry me the most are the ones that "authorities" engage in, because they are less likely to have the power of the law to help fight.

All of them are about tribalism and discrimination. Which is, of course, human nature. Sometimes our republic is really just a way to get people to go against their baser human nature, isn't it. Wendy P.

I hope you realize that this is exactly the kind of talking point that the most virulent of racists seize upon to rationalize their racism, and acting it out. I fear that in your instinct to be fair, you're unwittingly being an enabler.

[OHCHUTE 0]

billvon

> . . . mubbling fool. .. . OBAMACARE . . . poor small businesses . . .all about the
>African American. . . .fill those free school backpacks with cash . . . .

You forgot Benghazi and Bill Ayers.

The states and the fed are soon learning the true cost of IT programs, as no state will be ready with their exchange. Besides, if you remember the dot com craze, b2b and ecommerce failed miserably.

[rehmwa 2]

Andy9o8

I hope you realize that this is exactly the kind of talking point that the most virulent of racists seize upon to rationalize their racism, and acting it out. I fear that in your instinct to be fair, you're unwittingly being an enabler.

this is why we need fracking

...
Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

[billvon 2,450]

>Besides, if you remember the dot com craze, b2b and ecommerce failed miserably.

Right. Who can forget that huge ecommerce flop? Amazon failed miserably, movies are all still delivered on DVD's, and of course Elon Musk rues the day he founded Paypal.

[OHCHUTE 0]

billvon

>Besides, if you remember the dot com craze, b2b and ecommerce failed miserably.

Right. Who can forget that huge ecommerce flop? Amazon failed miserably, movies are all still delivered on DVD's, and of course Elon Musk rues the day he founded Paypal.

The dot com industry failed. Yet you pick several successes from the industry and claim there was no failure industry wide?

That's like saying: there was no stock market crash of 1929 because Hearst newspapers made a lot of money during the time.

The problem with you Billvon is that you pick one example and turn it around to try to suit your purpose, but you fail.

[billvon 2,450]

>.The dot com industry failed.

(says OHCHUTE as he posts on an ad-supported Internet board.)

You should tweet from an airplane one of these days to tell everyone that commercial aviation failed.

>That's like saying: there was no stock market crash of 1929 because Hearst
>newspapers made a lot of money during the time.

No, it's like saying that the newspaper industry failed.

[OHCHUTE 0]

billvon

>.The dot com industry failed.

(says OHCHUTE as he posts on an ad-supported Internet board.)

You should tweet from an airplane one of these days to tell everyone that commercial aviation failed.

>That's like saying: there was no stock market crash of 1929 because Hearst
>newspapers made a lot of money during the time.

No, it's like saying that the newspaper industry failed.

Your reasoning is flawed.
You must not remember the dot com bust since you were still in high school perhaps. Thousands of dot coms when out of business. But if you insist that there was no dot com bust then that is up to you.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dot-com_bubble

[billvon 2,450]

>You must not remember the dot com bust since you were still in high school perhaps.

No, actually I made a lot of money on it. Indeed, my company was one of the ones that you probably think "failed miserably."

>Thousands of dot coms when out of business.

Yes, they did. And even today there are far more failed dot coms than there are successful dot coms.

But insisting that "b2b and ecommerce failed miserably" is akin to insisting that commercial aviation failed miserably because Pan Am and Eastern Airlines went out of business.

[OHCHUTE 0]

billvon

>You must not remember the dot com bust since you were still in high school perhaps.

No, actually I made a lot of money on it. Indeed, my company was one of the ones that you probably think "failed miserably."

>Thousands of dot coms when out of business.

Yes, they did. And even today there are far more failed dot coms than there are successful dot coms.

But insisting that "b2b and ecommerce failed miserably" is akin to insisting that commercial aviation failed miserably because Pan Am and Eastern Airlines went out of business.

OK, so your reasoning is: the Titanic succeeded because some people got to their destinations.

You are unbelievable.

[Stumpy 256]

OHCHUTE

***>You must not remember the dot com bust since you were still in high school perhaps.

No, actually I made a lot of money on it. Indeed, my company was one of the ones that you probably think "failed miserably."

>Thousands of dot coms when out of business.

Yes, they did. And even today there are far more failed dot coms than there are successful dot coms.

But insisting that "b2b and ecommerce failed miserably" is akin to insisting that commercial aviation failed miserably because Pan Am and Eastern Airlines went out of business.

OK, so your reasoning is: the Titanic succeeded because some people got to their destinations.

You are unbelievable.

As someone who has worked very successfully in the .com, b2b and ecommerce business for the last 10 years, I'm quite confident in saying you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.

Never try to eat more than you can lift

[regulator 0]

One of President Lucifer’s sons, 17-year-old Iquise Taylor, brutally raped, strangled, and burglarized a 93-year-old woman, Amelia Rudolf, in Anderson, Indiana.

The rape took place in July, but we’re only now learning about it — and only via a local news report and the blogosphere ’cause we haven’t and will NEVER see or hear about it on national teevee. But if it were a white teen who raped an elderly black woman — Gosh, Golly, and OMG — this would be on national teevee 24/7.

Fox59 WXIN Indianopolis reports that on Monday, August 16, 2013, at a news conference, Anderson police announced formal charges against a 17-year-old suspect named Iquise V. Taylor, in connection with the July rape of a 93-year-old Anderson woman. Taylor is being charged as an adult, for rape, burglary, criminal confinement and strangulation.

According to court documents, “[The victim's] airway was blocked by the suspect’s hand and she could not breathe while the suspect confined her to her bed as he raped her.”

Anderson Police Chief Larry Crenshaw said although Taylor “lived close to” the victim, Amelia Rudolf, he (Crenshaw) “didn’t know if Rudolf was specifically targeted.” (Translation: This means Police Chief Crenshaw is refusing to call this a “hate crime.”)

Crenshaw said police had collected DNA samples from several people and connected Taylor to the rape through a DNA match. Crenshaw called it a “horrific and unimaginable attack” and said the department was satisfied to bring some kind of closure to Amelia Rudolf and her family. He said he’d met with Rudolf and told her the department would “bring justice in this life or the next.”

The victim’s daughter, Tresa Hale, described her mother as “brave” and “strong” and described her as a hero: “The fact that the Anderson Police Department caught the criminal (that) he will be off the streets… that’s one less criminal because of her surviving and enduring that. He won’t be able to hurt anyone else. Judgment Day will come for him. I know in my heart that if he lived life in prison that it will be terrifying for him.”

Fox59 usually does not release the names of victims in these cases but Amelia Rudolf, 93, chose to identify herself Monday, hours after Taylor was in court.

Rudolf expressed gratitude to the police, saying “If it wasn’t for the police department, I don’t know what I would’ve done. I didn’t think I’d live long enough to see who did it.” She wondered about her rapist’s upbringing, “I was just wondering how he was brought up…if his parents had taught him to do right.”

Rudolf acknowledged that going back to the home where she was attacked will be difficult: “I would like to go back because it’s the house my husband built and I’ve been happy there. I don’t know if I can go back there. They tell me to take my time.”

http://dcclothesline.com/2013/09/01/black-teen-rapes-93-y-o-white-woman-media-silent/

[Andy9o8 0]

That's an unspeakably horrible crime committed by an individual 17 year old criminal against the most vulnerable kind of victim.

All of which does nothing to bolster the unbelievably idiotic concept of a "war on whites".

Your threads and posts on here bitch a hell of a lot about black people. That's your choice, of course; the forum's open to all of us. But black people clearly grind your mental gears in a major way. I urge you to examine why. I'll give you a hint: the answer is not with them, it's within yourself.

Now you can either let yourself be propped-up by the typical responses (you know what they are) by the usual suspects (you know who they are) this post will inevitably generate. (They're irrelevant, but whatever.) Or, you can quietly look at yourself in the mirror and be honest with yourself. The choice is yours.

[rushmc 18]

Andy9o8

That's an unspeakably horrible crime committed by an individual 17 year old criminal against the most vulnerable kind of victim.

All of which does nothing to bolster the unbelievably idiotic concept of a "war on whites".

Your threads and posts on here bitch a hell of a lot about black people. That's your choice, of course; the forum's open to all of us. But black people clearly grind your mental gears in a major way. I urge you to examine why. I'll give you a hint: the answer is not with them, it's within yourself.

Now you can either let yourself be propped-up by the typical responses (you know what they are) by the usual suspects (you know who they are) this post will inevitably generate. (They're irrelevant, but whatever.) Or, you can quietly look at yourself in the mirror and be honest with yourself. The choice is yours.

But the Marting Zimmerman issue was different

Right?

Actually
I think YOU make his point
Think about it

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[regulator 0]

I don't bitch about black people. My next door neighbors are black and they are some of the nicest people on the planet. I am however always willing to point out double standards in the media and how blacks can do absolutely horrendous things and yet since they are black its gets no coverage with the liberal media.

[Stumpy 256]

Sorry what? The guy was charged on Monday and its in the news pretty quickly - I'm not seeing a huge conspiracy here?

Never try to eat more than you can lift

[champu 1]

As I said in another thread, worrying about whether a criminal used "hate" when committing a crime is as silly as worrying about whether a shooting involved an "assault weapon." They're both basically warnings that the person talking is about to suggest a completely misguided "solution."

Also, can we stop fighting over the national "outrage remote control" so you can be sure it's tuned to the channel you want?

[rushmc 18]

champu

As I said in another thread, worrying about whether a criminal used "hate" when committing a crime is as silly as worrying about whether a shooting involved an "assault weapon." They're both basically warnings that the person talking is about to suggest a completely misguided "solution."

Also, can we stop fighting over the national "outrage remote control" so you can be sure it's tuned to the channel you want?

So now YOU want to be in control of thread content???

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[champu 1]

rushmc

So now YOU want to be in control of thread content???

No, I think you misunderstand.

People see others get all worked up about some things and not all worked up about other things, and the default response seems to be, "Hey, maybe you should be as pissed off and angry about X as you are about Y." and I rarely see, "See how you can read this news about X without going non-linear? Why don't you also try that with Y?"

I don't want to be in control of thread content, it's just that more and more these days I think that, "where's the outrage?" is not a productive question.