Recommended Posts
shah269 0
I'm paying the bank to bail me out........or somehow unethical and not right?
Yeah...i'm paying for the appraisal, I'm paying for the legal reviews and what not and there is a fee to the bank to reprocess the paper work and
I am asking for a bail out?
Makes me wonder how much money the banks had to put out when they were bailed out via TARP?
The only thing that falls from the sky is birdshit and fools!
rushmc 18
shah!QuoteIt's funny how me paying for a refinance all of a sudden is a bailout.
I'm paying the bank to bail me out........or somehow unethical and not right?
Yeah...i'm paying for the appraisal, I'm paying for the legal reviews and what not and there is a fee to the bank to reprocess the paper work and
I am asking for a bail out?
Makes me wonder how much money the banks had to put out when they were bailed out via TARP?
You did not pay for a re-fi.
You payed to have your house appraised to see if it met the loan rules
Yours didnt
End of story
It has happened to thousands of people
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
shah269 0
Write that last check for the bank work.
However a refi is not a bail out.....correct?
I don't know I may be wrong
The only thing that falls from the sky is birdshit and fools!
rushmc 18
QuoteNope but I had all the paper work and was about to.
Write that last check for the bank work.
However a refi is not a bail out.....correct?
I don't know I may be wrong
All you was doing was trying to refinace your home at a lower rate. Correct?
What bail out do you think is owed you? (serious question and NOT try it be sachastic)
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
shah269 0
Quote
All you was doing was trying to refinace your home at a lower rate. Correct?
What bail out do you think is owed you? (serious question and NOT try it be sarcastic)
No i don't think I'm owed any bail out.
I was in the process of being able to refinance my home under the extended HARP program which is for those of us with good credit (700+) who are at between 125% and 135% under water.
I still had to pay for all the other stuff that everyone pays such as appraisal and closing costs. However the loan was backed by FHA...as I recall.
We were very close but all through January the bank was dragging its feet asking for me to resubmit various documents it had "lost".
Well it was moving, be it slowly, but when the feds came in and busted the other banks for their inappropriate actions my bank as many others, per my discussions with my friends and those in the support group, froze all action.
In a normal market this is not an issue for I or anyone would walk over to another financial institution and refinance with them! However now with the condo being under water by 100K I will have to bring that to the table so as to be able to move to another financial institution.
In my book, it appears that I am being held hostage to a financial institutions whims and the funds I have to bring to the table to move to another one is ransom.
Overall not a very good situation where there is room for great animosity and hostility.
The only thing that falls from the sky is birdshit and fools!
rushmc 18
QuoteQuote
All you was doing was trying to refinace your home at a lower rate. Correct?
What bail out do you think is owed you? (serious question and NOT try it be sarcastic)
No i don't think I'm owed any bail out.
I was in the process of being able to refinance my home under the extended HARP program which is for those of us with good credit (700+) who are at between 125% and 135% under water.
I still had to pay for all the other stuff that everyone pays such as appraisal and closing costs. However the loan was backed by FHA...as I recall.
We were very close but all through January the bank was dragging its feet asking for me to resubmit various documents it had "lost".
Well it was moving, be it slowly, but when the feds came in and busted the other banks for their inappropriate actions my bank as many others, per my discussions with my friends and those in the support group, froze all action.
In a normal market this is not an issue for I or anyone would walk over to another financial institution and refinance with them! However now with the condo being under water by 100K I will have to bring that to the table so as to be able to move to another financial institution.
In my book, it appears that I am being held hostage to a financial institutions whims and the funds I have to bring to the table to move to another one is ransom.
Overall not a very good situation where there is room for great animosity and hostility.
Sounds more like the feds did it to you. Not the bank
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
dks13827 3
QuoteWhere was it I read that the sign of a truly fair compromise (in any regard) is when both parties are pissed off?
Never bought into that. For example, the US might propose giving, for example, 30 Billion to some thug 3rd world county ( none of which will go to the regular citizens ). But perhaps the opposition, who cannot stop it completely, gets an agreement to only give the thug 20 billion. Now everyone is pissed off ! To me, the amount should be zero. This happens all the time and has much to do with the ruination of our country and many others.
I myself am in dire straits due to layoff (20 months) yet since I have not paid late yet the mortgage company has told me to 'drop dead'.... which has some appeal.
kallend 1,635
QuoteQuoteQuotethis whole deal is BS really. It will create more homeowners that go delinquent on their payments so they can cash in on this bailout. It's sad ..... a person's word/signature means nothing anymore to them. There is no personal responsibility anymore...... the attitude is "it's not my fault".
Note that's true on both sides of the loan. The Wall Streeters and banks who made these loans had no problem blaming it all on the government and taking bailout money. The individual homeowner blaming it on the banks is no different. If buyers had only taken loans they could afford, we wouldnt be in this mess. Similarly, if banks stood behind the loans they wrote (and only issued loans they'd stand behind), we wouldn't be in this mess. The difference here is one actually gets paid for their expertise on mortgages, and deals with thousands of them per year, while the other will go through it a handful of times in their life. But money buys influence, so the side with the money got bailed out years before the side without.
Blues,
Dave
Agreed.... but that is the problem with our model. Most banks do not hold their own paper. Even the big ones don't keep it all. They sell it to Fannie & Freddie who push what they see as acceptable. Do you know that FHA loans are not score driven at all? Insane.... banks obviously put limits on the score but if Fannie/Freddie/govt. had their way it would not take a credit score in to account at all.......
I think you miss his point entirely.
Bankers and other mortgage lenders are (supposed to be) professionals in the financial services industry and capable of looking after their own interests. The average homebuyer is not a financial services professional and is likely to believe what the (supposedly) professionals tell them they can afford.
Fortunately I bought my homes at a time when mortgage lenders were, on the whole, honest.
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
Destinations by Roxanne
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites