DaVinci 0 #26 July 6, 2010 QuoteAt least 38 justices -- including Rehnquist -- had no judicial experience before being nominated to the Supreme Court. While right-wing media have objected to the fact that Kagan has not previously served as a judge You skipped the Myers part. Why was the Left up in arms about Myers, but fine with Kagan? QuoteKagan's legal experience is comparable to that of Rehnquist, Thomas, and Roberts at the time of their nominations. From your own source, "Thomas had served as a judge for 16 months and John Roberts had served for roughly two years" 16 mths and two years is not the same as none. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DaVinci 0 #27 July 6, 2010 Seems you missed how your buddies had a hard on over Myers, but no issues now. Your double standard is showing. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #28 July 6, 2010 Quote Seems you missed how your buddies had a hard on over Myers, but no issues now. Your double standard is showing. And now you guys are getting all hot and a hard on over Kagan because its rumored that she is a lesbian.... DUDE... that is like TOTALLLY counterproductive if she is. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DaVinci 0 #29 July 12, 2010 QuoteAnd now you guys are getting all hot and a hard on over Kagan because its rumored that she is a lesbian.... DUDE... that is like TOTALLLY counterproductive if she is. Seems you are unable to discuss a topic without resulting to insults. Ever hear the phrase, "Play the ball, not the player?" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #30 July 12, 2010 QuoteQuoteAnd now you guys are getting all hot and a hard on over Kagan because its rumored that she is a lesbian.... DUDE... that is like TOTALLLY counterproductive if she is. Seems you are unable to discuss a topic without resulting to insults. Ever hear the phrase, "Play the ball, not the player?" Perhaps you should try it... that whole BY EXAMPLE thing that goes WHHHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH So much of the time for our favorite fringies around here. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #31 July 12, 2010 QuoteQuoteQuoteAnd now you guys are getting all hot and a hard on over Kagan because its rumored that she is a lesbian.... DUDE... that is like TOTALLLY counterproductive if she is. Seems you are unable to discuss a topic without resulting to insults. Ever hear the phrase, "Play the ball, not the player?" Perhaps you should try it... that whole BY EXAMPLE thing that goes WHHHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH So much of the time for our favorite fringies around here. As you so consistently show.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #32 July 12, 2010 Hey.. I am a turn about is fair play kinda gal.. ya know... whats good for yall ganders an all. I do know how much yall hate that sort of thing.... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gawain 0 #33 July 12, 2010 Quote Hey.. I am a turn about is fair play kinda gal.. ya know... whats good for yall ganders an all. I do know how much yall hate that sort of thing.... You're funny! So I try and I scream and I beg and I sigh Just to prove I'm alive, and it's alright 'Cause tonight there's a way I'll make light of my treacherous life Make light! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #34 July 12, 2010 Quote Quote Hey.. I am a turn about is fair play kinda gal.. ya know... whats good for yall ganders an all. I do know how much yall hate that sort of thing.... You're funny! Yeah..................But looks ain't everythang Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
StreetScooby 5 #35 July 14, 2010 Uhm, being able to side step questions with humor doesn't qualify you to be a judge on SCOTUS.We are all engines of karma Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DaVinci 0 #36 July 14, 2010 Got it.... You are unable to discuss a topic and must result to lame insults. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rehmwa 2 #37 July 14, 2010 Quote Got it.... You are unable to discuss a topic and must result to lame insults. actually, they are very creative, if a bit coarse and repetitive ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,400 #38 July 14, 2010 >Uhm, being able to side step questions with humor doesn't qualify you to >be a judge on SCOTUS. Nor does it disqualify you. It does indicate you'll do better than someone who does the deer-in-the-headlights thing though. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rehmwa 2 #39 July 14, 2010 does a teleprompter qualify as a headlight? (if it's tuned to max brightness) ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #40 July 14, 2010 Quote Got it.... You are unable to discuss a topic and must result to lame insults. IRONY Score off the scale... Please refer here Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #41 July 14, 2010 Quote Quote Got it.... You are unable to discuss a topic and must result to lame insults. IRONY Score off the scale... Please refer here Ok, so he's replied to you 126 times - have a point? Having re-read the exchanges in several of the threads listed on the first page of that search, you REALLY don't want to go there with the irony thing.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #42 July 14, 2010 Quote Quote Quote Got it.... You are unable to discuss a topic and must result to lame insults. IRONY Score off the scale... Please refer here Ok, so he's replied to you 126 times - have a point? Having re-read the exchanges in several of the threads listed on the first page of that search, you REALLY don't want to go there with the irony thing. Hey the sum total of that work is ironicFor someone bitching about insults.... glass houses come to mind Mikkeeeeee Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #43 July 14, 2010 Quote Hey the sum total of that work is ironic Given the nature of your responses to his...yes, it's QUITE ironic for you to claim irony. Quote For someone bitching about insults.... glass houses come to mind Mikkeeeeee You really don't want to go THERE, either.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #44 July 14, 2010 Quote Quote Hey the sum total of that work is ironic Given the nature of your responses to his...yes, it's QUITE ironic for you to claim irony. Quote For someone bitching about insults.... glass houses come to mind Mikkeeeeee You really don't want to go THERE, either. Like I said.. turn about and all that... I tend to react that way when people are a total asshole to me... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #45 July 14, 2010 Quote Quote Quote Hey the sum total of that work is ironic Given the nature of your responses to his...yes, it's QUITE ironic for you to claim irony. Quote For someone bitching about insults.... glass houses come to mind Mikkeeeeee You really don't want to go THERE, either. Like I said.. turn about and all that... I tend to react that way when people are a total asshole to me... Understandable - of course, that's usually in response to one of YOUR attacks.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #46 July 14, 2010 RIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIGHTMore often then not.. its more stalkerish then that Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #47 July 14, 2010 Quote RIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIGHTMore often then not.. its more stalkerish then that Really? Just in this thread: posting about the comparison between the experience of Kagan and other justices. DaVinci mentioned how the Libs were up in arms about the experience of Miers. YOU then made it about Kagan's supposed sexual orientation and then claimed you were attacked. Looks like that proves MY point about you starting it most of the time, than your victim scenario. I can continue, if you like.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #48 July 14, 2010 Quote Quote RIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIGHTMore often then not.. its more stalkerish then that Really? Just in this thread: posting about the comparison between the experience of Kagan and other justices. DaVinci mentioned how the Libs were up in arms about the experience of Miers. YOU then made it about Kagan's supposed sexual orientation and then claimed you were attacked. Looks like that proves MY point about you starting it most of the time, than your victim scenario. I can continue, if you like. By all means.. this is funny to watch.... and I am bored Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #49 July 14, 2010 I would have thought "sad", myself.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #50 July 14, 2010 Quote I would have thought "sad", myself. Well you go right ahead and be as "sad" as you wish.... remember now... I am not laughing with you Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
