rushmc 18 #151 June 15, 2007 Quote reply] Nice post, Amazon. It explains a lot about your more vitriolic posts. I mean that as a compliment. Nice compliment, in a back-handed kind of way. When you have been around a while, you develop historical perspective. What really gets to me about the modern conservative movement is the intense selfishness of the followers.Bull shit. The modern conservative movement is about do for your self and allowing you to be the best you can be. Offer freebies and you will kill self reliance and responcibility. I am not against helping out but what the left offers (like free nationalized health care is crap) You want to redistribute wealth then stay with the left. Want one to responcible for your actions and your own life? Become consevative. You had better learn about what you spew. It is all about them and their followers. Me, I, mine. Screw those that don't believe. They aren't part of the real america. There is only one way, the right way, their way. Dissent is unpatriotic and unamerican. We must follow our leaders unquestionly, right over the cliff like good lemmings. Fuck that talking point. Saying that is an attempt to stop debate because you can't survive in the area of ideasThe best government is no government there will alway have to be government but it does not have to be a big as it is today. The R's screwed away and oportunity when in control now the D's are going nuts with the bigest budget proposal in history and you had better look at the consequenses of the proposed taxe increase of which they speak today, except when it comes to private medical decisions and who you can commit your life to. They are all about states rights, unless the states do stuff they don't approve of, like Prop 215 in California, or the Oregon assisted suicide law. The reason that colleges and universities are usually quite liberal is very simple. Liberals are the ones with altruism.No, they think they are smarter than every one else. Look at just what happened in MA (i think) the D controled goverment there can't afford to put an issue before the voters cause they don't trust they will vote in a way the want Conservatives are greedy and selfish. Fucking stupid talking point. Why waste time working in education when you can make more money in business? What good does it do to teach people about things like philosophy and art? You can't make any money out of it. The rescumlicans took out a contract on america in 1994. The contract has been executed to perfection. They have managed to set the USA on a path to become like the UK after WWII. The UK was a world power. After WWII, that statue had gone away forever. We are well on the way to that bitter reality. And the righties cheer the decline. It is sad... so very sad that they hold party over country so firmly.What a sad post"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #152 June 15, 2007 QuoteFuckibng stupid talking point Yup... right wing and cant even spell FUCKING.... great show of rePUBICicanism Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #153 June 15, 2007 QuoteHow about the White House? (and where is this listing - I'd like to see how many of these people were AWOL from the Air National Guard) Bush 43 - yes Clinton - no Bush 41 - yes Reagan - yes Carter - yes Ford - yes Nixon - yes L. Johnson - yes Kennedy - yes Eisenhower - yes Truman - yes F. Roosevelt - no Hoover - no Coolidge - no Harding - no Wilson - no Taft - no T. Roosevelt - yes McKinley - yes Harrison - yes Cleveland - no Arthur - yes Garfield - yes Hayes - yes Grant - yes A. Johnson - yes Lincoln - yes Buchanan - yes Pierce - yes Fillmore - yes Taylor - yes Polk - yes Tyler - yes Harrison - yes Van Buren - no Jackson - yes J. Q. Adams - no Monroe - yes Madison - yes Jefferson - yes J. Adams - no Washington - yesMike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #154 June 15, 2007 WTF, Jeannie... I know you get riled, but this is beneath you...Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 1,652 #155 June 15, 2007 QuoteQuoteI have no problem with free speech or dissenting views and opinions. What I do have a problem with is people who can excuse some for dodging the draft and refusing to serve in THEIR COUNTRIES ARMED FORCES but not others just because of their underlying reason for doing so. A draft dodger is a draft dodger is a draft dodger...what part don't YOU understand??? . Is someone who wins a highly competitive and prestigious scholarship by virtue of their demonstrated merit and ability, and accepts their only opportunity to have said scholarship, to be counted as one who dodged the draft simply to avoid serving the country?... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Amazon 7 #156 June 15, 2007 Mike lets stick with those who are running the country in THIS century shall we???? Drumroll for the CHICKENHAWK SQUAD.. Please. http://www.angelfire.com/ok5/pearly/htmls/gop-pansies.html Be sure to check out the right column of those who did go. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mnealtx 0 #157 June 15, 2007 Quote Mike lets stick with those who are running the country in THIS century shall we???? Drumroll for the CHICKENHAWK SQUAD.. Please. http://www.angelfire.com/ok5/pearly/htmls/gop-pansies.html Be sure to check out the right column of those who did go. I'm sure Clinton will be listed, what with Somalia / Bosnia / Kosovo...right?Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Amazon 7 #158 June 15, 2007 Oh yeah.. CDIF... Stick to this crop of wonderful patriotic human beings in the 21st century that YOU elected. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mnealtx 0 #159 June 15, 2007 QuoteOh yeah.. CDIF... Stick to this crop of wonderful patriotic human beings in the 21st century that YOU elected. Sucks when people show that both sides are pretty damn much the same, doesn't it? I didn't vote for Bush, sorry... I didn't vote for Gore or Kerry either. There wasn't a candidate that I felt right about supporting.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites skydyvr 0 #160 June 15, 2007 Quote WTF, Jeannie... I know you get riled, but this is beneath you... She's just a little off kilter. My redfish lure has been hitting well today. . . =(_8^(1) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites SkyChimp 0 #161 June 15, 2007 QuoteOh and just saw your long post about all the things done in his behalf.....For an Oxford Scholar... as opposed to your Cheerleader partyboy.... Do you really think someone with a bachelors degree would have been drafted as a private??? Actually a majority of them were drafted as enlisted with bachelor degrees due to the limited amount of initial officer positions. Further more, people were then advanced to were brass by "field commissioning". I will say that the degree carried weight when being considered for selection. Does anyone else find it funny that we made a SPORT out of an EMERGENCY PROCEDURE?!?! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites SkyChimp 0 #162 June 15, 2007 QuoteQuoteFunny how people keep talking about how many served... For the 109th Congress: House: 69 Rep, 48 Dem with military service Senate: 19 Rep, 16 Dem with military service No numbers for the 110th posted as of yet... How about the White House? (and where is this listing - I'd like to see how many of these people were AWOL from the Air National Guard) You and this Air National Guard. You're starting to sound like Ben Stein. Bueller, Bueller Does anyone else find it funny that we made a SPORT out of an EMERGENCY PROCEDURE?!?! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites SkyChimp 0 #163 June 15, 2007 QuoteQuoteFuckibng stupid talking point Yup... right wing and cant even spell FUCKING.... great show of rePUBICicanism Jeanne, you sound like little Suzie fighting with little Johnny on the play ground. Does anyone else find it funny that we made a SPORT out of an EMERGENCY PROCEDURE?!?! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites willard 0 #164 June 15, 2007 QuoteQuoteQuoteI have no problem with free speech or dissenting views and opinions. What I do have a problem with is people who can excuse some for dodging the draft and refusing to serve in THEIR COUNTRIES ARMED FORCES but not others just because of their underlying reason for doing so. A draft dodger is a draft dodger is a draft dodger...what part don't YOU understand??? . Is someone who wins a highly competitive and prestigious scholarship by virtue of their demonstrated merit and ability, and accepts their only opportunity to have said scholarship, to be counted as one who dodged the draft simply to avoid serving the country? You damn skippy! Lots of people gave up a hell of a lot more than a Rhodes scholarship to serve their country in a war they didn't agree with, so why not bookworms? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Amazon 7 #165 June 15, 2007 Yep.. aint it kewl.. second childhood you know... and with the history with THISparticular Lush Rimjob supporter... ( EIB... BWAHAHAHAHAHA) I always enjoy helping him take a long long look in that mirror of his. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Krip 2 #166 June 15, 2007 Quote Quote How about the White House? (and where is this listing - I'd like to see how many of these people were AWOL from the Air National Guard) Bush 43 - yes Clinton - no Bush 41 - yes Reagan - yes Carter - yes Ford - yes Nixon - yes L. Johnson - yes Kennedy - yes Eisenhower - yes Truman - yes F. Roosevelt - no Hoover - no Coolidge - no Harding - no Wilson - no Taft - no T. Roosevelt - yes McKinley - yes Harrison - yes Cleveland - no Arthur - yes Garfield - yes Hayes - yes Grant - yes A. Johnson - yes Lincoln - yes Buchanan - yes Pierce - yes Fillmore - yes Taylor - yes Polk - yes Tyler - yes Harrison - yes Van Buren - no Jackson - yes J. Q. Adams - no Monroe - yes Madison - yes Jefferson - yes J. Adams - no Washington - yes The list has no meaning due to the wars and generations it covered. May as well add the political party of each president and argue about which party served their country the most while in the white house. BTW when was the white house built and the ANG started.On a BS scale of 1-10 1 for worst. On a waste of time scale of 1-10 1 for max. On the funny/dummy scale a 6-7 Return to the circle. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mnealtx 0 #167 June 15, 2007 He asked for a list of the Presidents that served in the military, which I provided. I don't really give much of a shit if the info meets with your approval or not.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Krip 2 #168 June 15, 2007 Quote He asked for a list of the Presidents that served in the military, which I provided. I don't really give much of a shit if the info meets with your approval or not. Is that any way to speak to a fellow member of the skydiving familyOf course i don't have to follow your example with a immature response, On a scale of 1 to 10 a 10!See I knew we, I, me, could bring out the best in you Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites NCclimber 0 #169 June 15, 2007 QuoteI guess you would have toask him....After he got me banned he was following me around forum to forum. This is a flat out LIE!!! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites NCclimber 0 #170 June 15, 2007 Quote In my personal experience... that kind of list can be hung on a HELL of a lot of men of that generation.. when No did not mean no.. but a maybe.. at least that is what the guys really believed. So you know "a HELL of a lot of men" who have been accused of rape and/or sexual assault by for or five women? That whole "no doesn't mean no" comparison to rape is one of the silliest (nicest word I could think of) analogies I've read here. My three year old daughter has better critical thinking skills. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites idrankwhat 0 #171 June 15, 2007 Quote So that somehow excuses what he did? (channeling NCCLIMBER) What he did or what he was accused of. Show meFor my next trick, I'll channel RUSHMC with "it's all about the charge". Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Amazon 7 #172 June 15, 2007 QuoteSo you know "a HELL of a lot of men" who have been accused of rape and/or sexual assault by for or five women? That whole "no doesn't mean no" comparison to rape is one of the silliest (nicest word I could think of) analogies I've read here. My three year old daughter has better critical thinking skills. Simple.. the STATISTICS( you do know what that means right) show that MOST women who suffer it do NOT report it because of the hell THEY will be put thru..date rape STATISTICS are fairly high... so I guess that is ok huh. NO MEANS NO. PERIOD... why do some people find that so hard to fathom. It still goes on.. No means maybe.. I still hear it. And how nice of you to make a PA using your daughter.. I hope she does not have to suffer the kinds of assaults that so many women in this country have... Perhaps you should work on comprehension skills there bud.. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites NCclimber 0 #173 June 15, 2007 Quote Simple.. the STATISTICS( you do know what that means right) show that MOST women who suffer it do NOT report it because of the hell THEY will be put thru..date rape STATISTICS are fairly high... so I guess that is ok huh. NO MEANS NO. PERIOD... why do some people find that so hard to fathom. It still goes on.. No means maybe.. I still hear it. With a list like the one below, one has to wonder how many of Clinton's assaults were never reported. Quote Juanita Broaddrick (AR)- rape Eileen Wellstone (Oxford) - rape Elizabeth Ward Gracen - rape - quid pro quo, post incident intimidation Regina Hopper Blakely - "forced himself on her, biting, bruising her" Kathleen Willey (WH) - sexual assault, intimidations, threats Sandra Allen James (DC) - sexual assault 22 Year Old 1972 (Yale) - sexual assault Kathy Bradshaw (AK) - sexual assault Cristy Zercher - unwelcome sexual advance, intimidations Paula Jones (AR) - unwelcome sexual advance, exposure, bordering on sexual assault Carolyn Moffet -unwelcome sexual advance, exposure, bordering on sexual assault 1974 student at University of Arkansas - unwelcome physical contact 1978-1980 - seven complaints per Arkansas state troopers Monica Lewinsky - quid pro quo, post incident character assault Gennifer Flowers - quid pro quo, post incident character assault Dolly Kyle Browning - post incident character assault Sally Perdue - post incident threats Betty Dalton - rebuffed his advances, married to one of his supporters Denise Reeder - apologetic note scanned Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites willard 0 #174 June 15, 2007 QuoteNO MEANS NO. PERIOD... why do some people find that so hard to fathom. It still goes on.. No means maybe.. I still hear it. Nobody challenges the argument that no means no. I think we are all in agreement on that. But it does seem strange you should be the one repeating it while at the same time defending Clinton against his accusers with the excuse that "no didn't always mean no". No means no. Always has, always will (unless Clinton needs to redefine "no" to suit his needs, kinda like the meaning of "is" or "sexual relations"). Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Amazon 7 #175 June 15, 2007 I am not defending him. if he attacked then he needs to be tried... if the charges were made and there was insufficient evidence to proceed that does NOT make him guuilty in our country... at least untill the REligious right takes over completely and making the THOUGHT of having sex a punishable crime. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next Page 7 of 13 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0 Go To Topic Listing
Amazon 7 #156 June 15, 2007 Mike lets stick with those who are running the country in THIS century shall we???? Drumroll for the CHICKENHAWK SQUAD.. Please. http://www.angelfire.com/ok5/pearly/htmls/gop-pansies.html Be sure to check out the right column of those who did go. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #157 June 15, 2007 Quote Mike lets stick with those who are running the country in THIS century shall we???? Drumroll for the CHICKENHAWK SQUAD.. Please. http://www.angelfire.com/ok5/pearly/htmls/gop-pansies.html Be sure to check out the right column of those who did go. I'm sure Clinton will be listed, what with Somalia / Bosnia / Kosovo...right?Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #158 June 15, 2007 Oh yeah.. CDIF... Stick to this crop of wonderful patriotic human beings in the 21st century that YOU elected. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #159 June 15, 2007 QuoteOh yeah.. CDIF... Stick to this crop of wonderful patriotic human beings in the 21st century that YOU elected. Sucks when people show that both sides are pretty damn much the same, doesn't it? I didn't vote for Bush, sorry... I didn't vote for Gore or Kerry either. There wasn't a candidate that I felt right about supporting.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skydyvr 0 #160 June 15, 2007 Quote WTF, Jeannie... I know you get riled, but this is beneath you... She's just a little off kilter. My redfish lure has been hitting well today. . . =(_8^(1) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyChimp 0 #161 June 15, 2007 QuoteOh and just saw your long post about all the things done in his behalf.....For an Oxford Scholar... as opposed to your Cheerleader partyboy.... Do you really think someone with a bachelors degree would have been drafted as a private??? Actually a majority of them were drafted as enlisted with bachelor degrees due to the limited amount of initial officer positions. Further more, people were then advanced to were brass by "field commissioning". I will say that the degree carried weight when being considered for selection. Does anyone else find it funny that we made a SPORT out of an EMERGENCY PROCEDURE?!?! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyChimp 0 #162 June 15, 2007 QuoteQuoteFunny how people keep talking about how many served... For the 109th Congress: House: 69 Rep, 48 Dem with military service Senate: 19 Rep, 16 Dem with military service No numbers for the 110th posted as of yet... How about the White House? (and where is this listing - I'd like to see how many of these people were AWOL from the Air National Guard) You and this Air National Guard. You're starting to sound like Ben Stein. Bueller, Bueller Does anyone else find it funny that we made a SPORT out of an EMERGENCY PROCEDURE?!?! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyChimp 0 #163 June 15, 2007 QuoteQuoteFuckibng stupid talking point Yup... right wing and cant even spell FUCKING.... great show of rePUBICicanism Jeanne, you sound like little Suzie fighting with little Johnny on the play ground. Does anyone else find it funny that we made a SPORT out of an EMERGENCY PROCEDURE?!?! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
willard 0 #164 June 15, 2007 QuoteQuoteQuoteI have no problem with free speech or dissenting views and opinions. What I do have a problem with is people who can excuse some for dodging the draft and refusing to serve in THEIR COUNTRIES ARMED FORCES but not others just because of their underlying reason for doing so. A draft dodger is a draft dodger is a draft dodger...what part don't YOU understand??? . Is someone who wins a highly competitive and prestigious scholarship by virtue of their demonstrated merit and ability, and accepts their only opportunity to have said scholarship, to be counted as one who dodged the draft simply to avoid serving the country? You damn skippy! Lots of people gave up a hell of a lot more than a Rhodes scholarship to serve their country in a war they didn't agree with, so why not bookworms? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Amazon 7 #165 June 15, 2007 Yep.. aint it kewl.. second childhood you know... and with the history with THISparticular Lush Rimjob supporter... ( EIB... BWAHAHAHAHAHA) I always enjoy helping him take a long long look in that mirror of his. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Krip 2 #166 June 15, 2007 Quote Quote How about the White House? (and where is this listing - I'd like to see how many of these people were AWOL from the Air National Guard) Bush 43 - yes Clinton - no Bush 41 - yes Reagan - yes Carter - yes Ford - yes Nixon - yes L. Johnson - yes Kennedy - yes Eisenhower - yes Truman - yes F. Roosevelt - no Hoover - no Coolidge - no Harding - no Wilson - no Taft - no T. Roosevelt - yes McKinley - yes Harrison - yes Cleveland - no Arthur - yes Garfield - yes Hayes - yes Grant - yes A. Johnson - yes Lincoln - yes Buchanan - yes Pierce - yes Fillmore - yes Taylor - yes Polk - yes Tyler - yes Harrison - yes Van Buren - no Jackson - yes J. Q. Adams - no Monroe - yes Madison - yes Jefferson - yes J. Adams - no Washington - yes The list has no meaning due to the wars and generations it covered. May as well add the political party of each president and argue about which party served their country the most while in the white house. BTW when was the white house built and the ANG started.On a BS scale of 1-10 1 for worst. On a waste of time scale of 1-10 1 for max. On the funny/dummy scale a 6-7 Return to the circle. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mnealtx 0 #167 June 15, 2007 He asked for a list of the Presidents that served in the military, which I provided. I don't really give much of a shit if the info meets with your approval or not.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Krip 2 #168 June 15, 2007 Quote He asked for a list of the Presidents that served in the military, which I provided. I don't really give much of a shit if the info meets with your approval or not. Is that any way to speak to a fellow member of the skydiving familyOf course i don't have to follow your example with a immature response, On a scale of 1 to 10 a 10!See I knew we, I, me, could bring out the best in you Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites NCclimber 0 #169 June 15, 2007 QuoteI guess you would have toask him....After he got me banned he was following me around forum to forum. This is a flat out LIE!!! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites NCclimber 0 #170 June 15, 2007 Quote In my personal experience... that kind of list can be hung on a HELL of a lot of men of that generation.. when No did not mean no.. but a maybe.. at least that is what the guys really believed. So you know "a HELL of a lot of men" who have been accused of rape and/or sexual assault by for or five women? That whole "no doesn't mean no" comparison to rape is one of the silliest (nicest word I could think of) analogies I've read here. My three year old daughter has better critical thinking skills. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites idrankwhat 0 #171 June 15, 2007 Quote So that somehow excuses what he did? (channeling NCCLIMBER) What he did or what he was accused of. Show meFor my next trick, I'll channel RUSHMC with "it's all about the charge". Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Amazon 7 #172 June 15, 2007 QuoteSo you know "a HELL of a lot of men" who have been accused of rape and/or sexual assault by for or five women? That whole "no doesn't mean no" comparison to rape is one of the silliest (nicest word I could think of) analogies I've read here. My three year old daughter has better critical thinking skills. Simple.. the STATISTICS( you do know what that means right) show that MOST women who suffer it do NOT report it because of the hell THEY will be put thru..date rape STATISTICS are fairly high... so I guess that is ok huh. NO MEANS NO. PERIOD... why do some people find that so hard to fathom. It still goes on.. No means maybe.. I still hear it. And how nice of you to make a PA using your daughter.. I hope she does not have to suffer the kinds of assaults that so many women in this country have... Perhaps you should work on comprehension skills there bud.. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites NCclimber 0 #173 June 15, 2007 Quote Simple.. the STATISTICS( you do know what that means right) show that MOST women who suffer it do NOT report it because of the hell THEY will be put thru..date rape STATISTICS are fairly high... so I guess that is ok huh. NO MEANS NO. PERIOD... why do some people find that so hard to fathom. It still goes on.. No means maybe.. I still hear it. With a list like the one below, one has to wonder how many of Clinton's assaults were never reported. Quote Juanita Broaddrick (AR)- rape Eileen Wellstone (Oxford) - rape Elizabeth Ward Gracen - rape - quid pro quo, post incident intimidation Regina Hopper Blakely - "forced himself on her, biting, bruising her" Kathleen Willey (WH) - sexual assault, intimidations, threats Sandra Allen James (DC) - sexual assault 22 Year Old 1972 (Yale) - sexual assault Kathy Bradshaw (AK) - sexual assault Cristy Zercher - unwelcome sexual advance, intimidations Paula Jones (AR) - unwelcome sexual advance, exposure, bordering on sexual assault Carolyn Moffet -unwelcome sexual advance, exposure, bordering on sexual assault 1974 student at University of Arkansas - unwelcome physical contact 1978-1980 - seven complaints per Arkansas state troopers Monica Lewinsky - quid pro quo, post incident character assault Gennifer Flowers - quid pro quo, post incident character assault Dolly Kyle Browning - post incident character assault Sally Perdue - post incident threats Betty Dalton - rebuffed his advances, married to one of his supporters Denise Reeder - apologetic note scanned Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites willard 0 #174 June 15, 2007 QuoteNO MEANS NO. PERIOD... why do some people find that so hard to fathom. It still goes on.. No means maybe.. I still hear it. Nobody challenges the argument that no means no. I think we are all in agreement on that. But it does seem strange you should be the one repeating it while at the same time defending Clinton against his accusers with the excuse that "no didn't always mean no". No means no. Always has, always will (unless Clinton needs to redefine "no" to suit his needs, kinda like the meaning of "is" or "sexual relations"). Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Amazon 7 #175 June 15, 2007 I am not defending him. if he attacked then he needs to be tried... if the charges were made and there was insufficient evidence to proceed that does NOT make him guuilty in our country... at least untill the REligious right takes over completely and making the THOUGHT of having sex a punishable crime. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next Page 7 of 13 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0
Amazon 7 #165 June 15, 2007 Yep.. aint it kewl.. second childhood you know... and with the history with THISparticular Lush Rimjob supporter... ( EIB... BWAHAHAHAHAHA) I always enjoy helping him take a long long look in that mirror of his. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Krip 2 #166 June 15, 2007 Quote Quote How about the White House? (and where is this listing - I'd like to see how many of these people were AWOL from the Air National Guard) Bush 43 - yes Clinton - no Bush 41 - yes Reagan - yes Carter - yes Ford - yes Nixon - yes L. Johnson - yes Kennedy - yes Eisenhower - yes Truman - yes F. Roosevelt - no Hoover - no Coolidge - no Harding - no Wilson - no Taft - no T. Roosevelt - yes McKinley - yes Harrison - yes Cleveland - no Arthur - yes Garfield - yes Hayes - yes Grant - yes A. Johnson - yes Lincoln - yes Buchanan - yes Pierce - yes Fillmore - yes Taylor - yes Polk - yes Tyler - yes Harrison - yes Van Buren - no Jackson - yes J. Q. Adams - no Monroe - yes Madison - yes Jefferson - yes J. Adams - no Washington - yes The list has no meaning due to the wars and generations it covered. May as well add the political party of each president and argue about which party served their country the most while in the white house. BTW when was the white house built and the ANG started.On a BS scale of 1-10 1 for worst. On a waste of time scale of 1-10 1 for max. On the funny/dummy scale a 6-7 Return to the circle. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #167 June 15, 2007 He asked for a list of the Presidents that served in the military, which I provided. I don't really give much of a shit if the info meets with your approval or not.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Krip 2 #168 June 15, 2007 Quote He asked for a list of the Presidents that served in the military, which I provided. I don't really give much of a shit if the info meets with your approval or not. Is that any way to speak to a fellow member of the skydiving familyOf course i don't have to follow your example with a immature response, On a scale of 1 to 10 a 10!See I knew we, I, me, could bring out the best in you Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NCclimber 0 #169 June 15, 2007 QuoteI guess you would have toask him....After he got me banned he was following me around forum to forum. This is a flat out LIE!!! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NCclimber 0 #170 June 15, 2007 Quote In my personal experience... that kind of list can be hung on a HELL of a lot of men of that generation.. when No did not mean no.. but a maybe.. at least that is what the guys really believed. So you know "a HELL of a lot of men" who have been accused of rape and/or sexual assault by for or five women? That whole "no doesn't mean no" comparison to rape is one of the silliest (nicest word I could think of) analogies I've read here. My three year old daughter has better critical thinking skills. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
idrankwhat 0 #171 June 15, 2007 Quote So that somehow excuses what he did? (channeling NCCLIMBER) What he did or what he was accused of. Show meFor my next trick, I'll channel RUSHMC with "it's all about the charge". Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #172 June 15, 2007 QuoteSo you know "a HELL of a lot of men" who have been accused of rape and/or sexual assault by for or five women? That whole "no doesn't mean no" comparison to rape is one of the silliest (nicest word I could think of) analogies I've read here. My three year old daughter has better critical thinking skills. Simple.. the STATISTICS( you do know what that means right) show that MOST women who suffer it do NOT report it because of the hell THEY will be put thru..date rape STATISTICS are fairly high... so I guess that is ok huh. NO MEANS NO. PERIOD... why do some people find that so hard to fathom. It still goes on.. No means maybe.. I still hear it. And how nice of you to make a PA using your daughter.. I hope she does not have to suffer the kinds of assaults that so many women in this country have... Perhaps you should work on comprehension skills there bud.. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NCclimber 0 #173 June 15, 2007 Quote Simple.. the STATISTICS( you do know what that means right) show that MOST women who suffer it do NOT report it because of the hell THEY will be put thru..date rape STATISTICS are fairly high... so I guess that is ok huh. NO MEANS NO. PERIOD... why do some people find that so hard to fathom. It still goes on.. No means maybe.. I still hear it. With a list like the one below, one has to wonder how many of Clinton's assaults were never reported. Quote Juanita Broaddrick (AR)- rape Eileen Wellstone (Oxford) - rape Elizabeth Ward Gracen - rape - quid pro quo, post incident intimidation Regina Hopper Blakely - "forced himself on her, biting, bruising her" Kathleen Willey (WH) - sexual assault, intimidations, threats Sandra Allen James (DC) - sexual assault 22 Year Old 1972 (Yale) - sexual assault Kathy Bradshaw (AK) - sexual assault Cristy Zercher - unwelcome sexual advance, intimidations Paula Jones (AR) - unwelcome sexual advance, exposure, bordering on sexual assault Carolyn Moffet -unwelcome sexual advance, exposure, bordering on sexual assault 1974 student at University of Arkansas - unwelcome physical contact 1978-1980 - seven complaints per Arkansas state troopers Monica Lewinsky - quid pro quo, post incident character assault Gennifer Flowers - quid pro quo, post incident character assault Dolly Kyle Browning - post incident character assault Sally Perdue - post incident threats Betty Dalton - rebuffed his advances, married to one of his supporters Denise Reeder - apologetic note scanned Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
willard 0 #174 June 15, 2007 QuoteNO MEANS NO. PERIOD... why do some people find that so hard to fathom. It still goes on.. No means maybe.. I still hear it. Nobody challenges the argument that no means no. I think we are all in agreement on that. But it does seem strange you should be the one repeating it while at the same time defending Clinton against his accusers with the excuse that "no didn't always mean no". No means no. Always has, always will (unless Clinton needs to redefine "no" to suit his needs, kinda like the meaning of "is" or "sexual relations"). Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #175 June 15, 2007 I am not defending him. if he attacked then he needs to be tried... if the charges were made and there was insufficient evidence to proceed that does NOT make him guuilty in our country... at least untill the REligious right takes over completely and making the THOUGHT of having sex a punishable crime. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
