Recommended Posts
Mike111 0
Ok, fair enough, some people did say before th ewar started.
But, what i meant by political suicide was the fact that all these questinos are now being put forward to which Bush has to answer.
Although i think the Americans are doing well in Iraq, considering the opposition they face.
Edited to add - the Americans are making good progress under the circumstances and are doing well aginst the insurgency, whether they should be there or not, that is fair?
Thus generally, overall, IMHO although the facts were sugar coated a bit, they are making good progress.
But, what i meant by political suicide was the fact that all these questinos are now being put forward to which Bush has to answer.
Although i think the Americans are doing well in Iraq, considering the opposition they face.
Edited to add - the Americans are making good progress under the circumstances and are doing well aginst the insurgency, whether they should be there or not, that is fair?
Thus generally, overall, IMHO although the facts were sugar coated a bit, they are making good progress.
billvon 2,435
>But, what i meant by political suicide was the fact that all these
>questinos are now being put forward to which Bush has to answer.
Why does he have to answer them? He has done an excellent job so far of dodging them.
>Although i think the Americans are doing well in Iraq, considering
>the opposition they face.
That may well be true. But if you were to say to a pro-war right winger back in Jan '03 "I think our troops will be doing an good job two years from now, but they will still be dying at the rate of dozens a month, and the insurgency will still be going strong" you would have been branded a hysterical america hating left winger. And if you told them that you thought we might lose thousands of US troops to the war? They'd think up some worse names to call you.
We've got some good people over there. Our problem lies not in our troops, it is in the meatgrinder we sent them into. I don't think withdrawal is the best answer either, but it is what we will be forced into. The question will not be "when can we leave and leave a peaceful, democratic Iraq behind?" the question will be "how many US troops are we willing to lose to an endless war?"
>questinos are now being put forward to which Bush has to answer.
Why does he have to answer them? He has done an excellent job so far of dodging them.
>Although i think the Americans are doing well in Iraq, considering
>the opposition they face.
That may well be true. But if you were to say to a pro-war right winger back in Jan '03 "I think our troops will be doing an good job two years from now, but they will still be dying at the rate of dozens a month, and the insurgency will still be going strong" you would have been branded a hysterical america hating left winger. And if you told them that you thought we might lose thousands of US troops to the war? They'd think up some worse names to call you.
We've got some good people over there. Our problem lies not in our troops, it is in the meatgrinder we sent them into. I don't think withdrawal is the best answer either, but it is what we will be forced into. The question will not be "when can we leave and leave a peaceful, democratic Iraq behind?" the question will be "how many US troops are we willing to lose to an endless war?"
Mike111 0
Quote>But, what i meant by political suicide was the fact that all these
>questinos are now being put forward to which Bush has to answer.
Why does he have to answer them? He has done an excellent job so far of dodging them.
In other words, war will have to be fought at some time, so i see no reason to delay. A lot of countries are fighting Al Q, so surely now it would be a time to take on the insurgents while other countries are doing? - a more concentrated effort
I hope that makessense ( I often express things badly)
Cos otherwise people will get tired of him dodging . Eventually the ball will come back round to his court and stay there.
Sorry to be pinicky, but whether the war is endles or not, the terrorists would still strike forcing us to fight an endless whether it be in Iraq , or any another country. Shouldn;t we face up to it and not let them get onto our (UK and USA) homelands?
>should have realised in hindsight.
Some of us have been saying this for years. We were attacked for saying it back then, too.
>im sure they wouldn't have assumed these things without good
>reason - like is happening now, to do so is political suicide.
?? They achieved their political objective, which was the removal of Saddam. That's been a goal of the PNAC for over a decade. The WMD thing was just an excuse everyone could agree on. This was pretty clear last year, and Bush still won the election - so apparently it was not suicide.
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites