Recommended Posts
rhino 0
Quoteyou can't blame a certain group of Iraqis for trying to defend their way of life.
you can't tell me that you wouldn't be fighting back and fight back in any way that you could.
Sure I can blame them. If some innocent truck driver was delivering supplies to get my country rebuilt I wouldn't go lopping his head off. You must be fucking sick for sympathizing with these jack offs. Your comparison is EXTREMELY off base.
I would fight back, sure. I don't consider beheading innocent people fighting back. I consider that cowardice.
I consider what happened at Abu Garib ? Prison cowardice as well. At least when they took photos they had the balls not to wear hoods. It was fucked up none the less and every one of those people will pay the price.
Rhino
rhino 0
QuoteWhy is it that America must force their way of life on other nations?
NOTHING IS WRONG WITH FREEDOM.
rhino 0
If one wants to be a fucking idiot go ahead and try and sympathize with these bastards. Anyone going after innocent children in school deserves to have their entire family wiped out.
I say again. These people are not even human. They have no rights. They need to be WIPED THE FUCK OUT!!!!!!
Rhino
I say again. These people are not even human. They have no rights. They need to be WIPED THE FUCK OUT!!!!!!
QuoteRussian forces killed 27 hostage takers, Interfax quoted officials as saying.
Valery Andreyev, head of the local branch of the FSB intelligence service, said 10 of the dead hostage-takers were from Arab countries, after Russian troops stormed the school earlier Friday. (Map of school)
Until now, the rebels were all thought to have been residents of the restive Republic of Chechnya or other parts of the Russian Caucasus.
One witness told a reporter that a hostage-taker had set off a suicide bomb in a gymnasium full of children.
Near the scene, news footage showed bodies of children on stretchers.
One woman leaned down to a young boy, hugging and caressing the youth, who shared a stretcher with a body. Other women stood, holding their hands to their mouths and weeping.
Rhino
juanesky 0
Quote
My guess is that the attack to the twin tower was a retaliation for the policies taken for years in the middle east. Specially the unconditional support to Israel. And you just said that retaliation is a valid reason to accept collateral damage, right?
The twin towers was the simbol of capitalism, that is what they aimed at, the rest was collateral damage. If they really had wanted to kill many many more people, they could have striked a football stadium, a nuclear plant, etc.
wow and how many years studying phsychology help you to reach this uneducated guess? 3-4?
Yes, I guess the Puerta de Atocha bombings was just a little protest for the pork served in the paella
"According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon
skydyvr 0
QuoteYes, I guess the Puerta de Atocha bombings was just a little protest for the pork served in the paella
The Terrorist's Apologists have been thick as theives in this thread.
. . =(_8^(1)
rhino 0
The incident in Russia, concerning the school come to find out was funded by Al Queda,,,,,,
Any pukes in here want to try and justify those actions?
Rhino
Any pukes in here want to try and justify those actions?
Rhino
skydyvr 0
QuoteAny pukes in here want to try and justify those actions?
Dude -- Al-Qaida is just a misunderstood group of cool folks with plenty of legitimate gripes, so just relax. Murdering people en-mass and taking out economic structures is the only way they know how to express themselves, so it's all good. That's why so many liberals here make excuses for them.
Excepting the intentional slaughter of innocent men, women, and children, they're "just people". Can't you see that?
(retch . . .)
. . =(_8^(1)
juanesky 0
Yep and don't forget, in Iraq, US forces have only killed pure and innocent civilians, except for 1 or just a handful
"According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon
QuoteI guess, then, it comes down to, "Who started it?"
And it was THOSE pieces of shit. We are just reacting to protect ourselves.
The U.S started. That is why your president called it pre-emptive war. We are not talking about afghanistan or alquaeda, but about Irak. At least when other people sais nuke them, i think they mean Irak and not afghanistan.
QuoteBy the way, I totally disagree with your claim that the U.S. Military (it's not just the "army" over there) is "not better at all." That's a big load of bullshit. We are not a conquering force, looking around the world for places to take over. If we wanted to, we could, and it speaks well of our self-restraint that we are not looking to "expand our empire."
My mistake... first afghanistan (somewhat justified, i will concede), now Irak, (face it, irakies want you out of their country), and there has been talks about who will be next.
That is a conquering force in my book. And by the way, you could not invade much more without streching your forces too thin... so don´t talk about restrain.
QuoteAnd if we were all about killing civilians indiscriminately like the terrorists are, don't you think there would be a LOT more unarmed, defenseless Iraqi civilians dying every day?
I have already posted about that distinction. but again when you see the figures that distintinction is not that big distinction anymore.
QuoteThey are NOT TARGETED by our military. We do what we can to AVOID them getting killed. That hardly makes us qualify as terrorists.
what you could do to avoid them getting killed is stop droping bombs where you think there may be a terrorist, however the US air force prefers the collateral damage rather than let one bad guy escape.
QuoteQuoteQuote
Your statement is stupid because US pilots don't intentionally drop bombs on civilians.
Yes they do.
Can you introduce any sort of evidence of this?
Of course, One of the first hints of the whereabout of Saddam and his sons was in a restaurant. Bomb droped dozens of victims, saddam was not there.
A little girllos 8 members of her family (and a limb)
more... a wedding, someone shoots at the air (old tradition) bomb droped, most people including the bride dies.
i will post the links when i have a bit of time, but trust me, that happened.
Quotewow and how many years studying phsychology help you to reach this uneducated guess? 3-4?
dude, do you have a higher education? sort of a bachellor degre or a master degree? You must have like 2 or 3 of each because you don´t miss a chance to make fun of my studies.
QuoteYes, I guess the Puerta de Atocha bombings was just a little protest for the pork served in the paella
Tasteless as usual... however this time you made me laugh. The terrorist attack was not in "Puerta de Atocha" , but in "estacion de atocha" diferent stations, dude. Who cooks paella for you? whoever it is must be a terrible cook. dude, paella has no pork on it. You must have gotten pork and chicken confused.
You are improving yourself, you could not possible make more mistake per line.
QuoteThe Terrorist's Apologists have been thick as theives in this thread.
I don´t think there is anyone in this thread that makes apology of terrorism. Can you name a single one?
I don´t understand quite well what thick as theives means, but sounds to me like a personal attack.
I think this is crap. You can't put someone in the same category as Stalin and Hitler if he was leading a country that was under ATTACK and had to take drastic measures in SELF DEFENSE. Sometimes self defense, on a national level, means that you have to go INTO the den of your enemy and take them out, and that is not possible to do without harming SOME innocents. But the deaths of those innocents are on the head of the people who made your invasion necessary in the first place. You do what you can to avoid killing innocents, but it's not always possible.
-
"With tha thoughts of a militant mind... Hard line, hard line after hard line!"
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites