0
borgy

conflicting statement on rigs

Recommended Posts

I am a new sky diver, and i am currently trying to research what chute is appropriate. I way aprox 70 kg, and I have been told by many JM's at my drop zone that a 170 to a 190 is appropriate. However I continiously see threads on this sight criticising new jumpers useing this equiptment. Who do I believe???
I only trust two people in this world, one of them is me and the other one aint you.
Nicolas Cage as Cameron Poe in "Con Air"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Choose your own canopy size. At your level it would be wise to select a main that has you at a wingload of 0.9:1 or maybe a 1.0:1 at the outside. Make sure you don't get a semi-elipitacle or a fully eliptacle. A conservative 7 cell comes to my mind.
-Richard-
"You're Holding The Rope And I'm Taking The Fall"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
(For our American friends, a 70kg person will be about 175-180lbs out the door.)

Wingloading is your exit weight (you + rig) in lbs, divided by the size of your canopy in sq feet. 10kg (22lbs) is a reasonable weight to budget for a rig.

A sensible first canopy choice would have a wingloading of approximately 1.0. So, for you a 170 (1.03) to a 190 (0.93) should be fine. If you weighed 100kg, you'd have a wingloading of 1.42 under a 170. That'd be stupid for a first rig, and you wouldn't be allowed jump it at Picton.

Listen to your instructors; by and large they're a sensible bunch. Also, you should be aware that Phil has to approve your first rig. He's not going to let you jump something too dangerous. After all, life-flights are no fun for anyone.

Additionally, you can't jump your own rig until you've done at least some of your B-rels. Talk to an instructor about this... not being an instructor I don't know the details.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

(For our American friends, a 70kg person will be about 175-180lbs out the door.)



I read his post as being 70 kg body weight. 70 x 2.54 = 177.8. Add 20ish pounds for the gear. That's 1.16 on a 170.



uhm, that should read: 70 x 2.2 = 154

1 kg = 2.2 lb

you were thinking inches to cm, 1 inch = 2.54 cm

;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

(For our American friends, a 70kg person will be about 175-180lbs out the door.)



I read his post as being 70 kg body weight. 70 x 2.54 = 177.8. Add 20ish pounds for the gear. That's 1.16 on a 170.



uhm, that should read: 70 x 2.2 = 154

1 kg = 2.2 lb

you were thinking inches to cm, 1 inch = 2.54 cm

;)



Sorry, bytchy, but 980 is correct....but I will consult you sometime in the future for what to do with my %50 off Flite Suite coupon. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yeah mate thanks,
That makes sense I didn't realise that first rigs needed to be approved. But I think I would feel ok about a 170 now. I realise i need to do the conversion and some of b rels I'm just doing some research as I'm about to finish my aff so beers will be on me this weekend if all goes to plan.

Thanks for the advice all very helpful
I only trust two people in this world, one of them is me and the other one aint you.
Nicolas Cage as Cameron Poe in "Con Air"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Based on the limited info you provided, I feel a 170 or a 190 would be okay. You can choose if you want to take the more conservative route or push it a bit.

Consider this. Are you going to be jumping on a regular basis? Will you be on hold for winter?

If the answer is yes, consider a good used 190 in a rig that will also house a 170. Then when spring arrives and you are putting some jumps on the 190, trade it out for the 170.

What you want to avoid is just getting off student status, then having to go on a winter hold and coming back uncurrent on the smaller canopy. Too many variables.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Peace and Blue Skies!
Bonnie ==>Gravity Gear!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Will you be on hold for winter?



Winter? What's that? Oh yeah, it's when the jumping finishes at 4:30pm instead of 7... ;)

Just so ya know, Picton has year-round jumping. You'll get blown out occasionally in Sep/Oct due to turbulent Westerly winds, but the rest of the year is just fine...

Oh yeah, and it's just coming into spring/summer now B|.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Will you be on hold for winter?



Winter? What's that? Oh yeah, it's when the jumping finishes at 4:30pm instead of 7... ;)
*Snipp*



Ya bastard! GrumblegrumblegrumbleGrumblegrumblegrumble
GrumblegrumblegrumbleGrumblegrumblegrumble
GrumblegrumblegrumbleGrumblegrumblegrumble
GrumblegrumblegrumbleGrumblegrumblegrumble
Grumblegrumblegrumble...

If you go as low as 170 make sure it is square and not eliptical at all, if you go 190 I might have considered a slight eliptical (Springo type, but stay away from the french stuff...) and depending on how you fly currently, otherwise there have been better advice around here.
_______________________________________
What goes up, must come down...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


If you go as low as 170 make sure it is square and not eliptical at all, if you go 190 I might have considered a slight eliptical (Springo type, but stay away from the french stuff...)



I find your advice a bit strange, a Springo is an elliptical canopy similar to a Stiletto but twitchier, for which you need 500 jumps in The Netherlands. Would that be approved a first canopy?? And you'd be underloading it so what's the point of jumping one that big anyway.
As for all square, not many canopies are anymore.

I'd go with a 170 or 190 intermediate canopy, like Spectre, Triathlon, Sabre (2), Pilot, Safire (2), Electra, ...

ciel bleu,
Saskia

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote


If you go as low as 170 make sure it is square and not eliptical at all, if you go 190 I might have considered a slight eliptical (Springo type, but stay away from the french stuff...)



I find your advice a bit strange, a Springo is an elliptical canopy similar to a Stiletto but twitchier, for which you need 500 jumps in The Netherlands. Would that be approved a first canopy?? And you'd be underloading it so what's the point of jumping one that big anyway.
As for all square, not many canopies are anymore.

I'd go with a 170 or 190 intermediate canopy, like Spectre, Triathlon, Sabre (2), Pilot, Safire (2), Electra, ...



Sorry, you are absolutely right, my mistake. I will edit my post. And I meant merit (I am sure I did anyway...)
_______________________________________
What goes up, must come down...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Student rigs at Picton are SOS ripcord - mostly Telesis. I believe the reasoning is that the student should be comfortable in freefall before transitioning to BOC throwout gear.

That said, I'm not an instructor and could easily be wrong :).

edit: I can chase up an instructor and ask them the question if you're interested. PM me if so.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I am a new sky diver, and i am currently trying to research what chute is appropriate. I way aprox 70 kg, and I have been told by many JM's at my drop zone that a 170 to a 190 is appropriate. However I continiously see threads on this sight criticising new jumpers useing this equiptment. Who do I believe???

For my first rig, I started off on (and still am on) a 170 at wingload 1.1 -- BUT I was renting for a longer time, and already had 57 jumps before I started trial-jumping 170 rentals. This is where I still am and staying where I am for at least another hundred jumps.

Erring on the safe side is always good, 190 works well. If you do get a 170, I strongly recommend Brian Germain's "Parachute and Its Pilot" book -- just so you are armed with the extra information you need for the responsibility of slightly exceeding recommendations (such as 1.1 on a 170). You CAN get hurt.

That being said, a nice trusty square Sabre at that 1.1 wingload will still be safer than an elliptical at 1.0 wingload. So parachute type and performance plays a factor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0