1969912 0 #1 May 19, 2012 04:55 EDT. Hope it goes well. http://www.nasa.gov/exploration/commercial/cargo/spacex_update_staticfiring.html NASA TV schedule: http://www.nasa.gov/exploration/commercial/cargo/cots_tv_schedule.html "Once we got to the point where twenty/something's needed a place on the corner that changed the oil in their cars we were doomed . . ." -NickDG Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 3 #2 May 19, 2012 Yep. Should be interesting. I plan on staying up for it, but my recorders are set just in case.quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skydiver30960 0 #3 May 19, 2012 Any night jumps planned to get freefall shots with the vehicle in the background? Elvisio "Falcon, Dragon, and a flying Chili Pepper all in one shot" Rodriguez Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 3 #4 May 19, 2012 As I write this, we're about one hour away from the Falcon 9 launch of the Dragon spacecraft. http://www.ustream.tv/nasahdtv It's not the most important launch in the history of space flight. It doesn't carry anything particularly important on it, neither men nor important and vital cargo, but it does represent an important shift in how space travel might be able to happen from this point forward. Forget the hype surrounding Virgin Galactic and "tourist" astronauts. This is real, honest to goodness commercial space flight by a private company that build their own space craft from the ground up. Right now they're running videos of the craft during its final assembly. What strikes me is how industrial it all seems compared to what were used to in NASA prep. This ought to be fun.quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SethInMI 146 #5 May 19, 2012 Doh! Time to look at the log files. (Story of my work life...).It's flare not flair, brakes not breaks, bridle not bridal, "could NOT care less" not "could care less". Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 3 #6 May 19, 2012 Shortly after the abort somebody said it had something to do with a high pressure indication in engine five. Was a pretty dramatic abort.quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
strife 0 #7 May 19, 2012 an abort chamber pressure high Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1969912 0 #8 May 19, 2012 Yeah, that was pretty much at the last second. They'll get it sorted out. "Once we got to the point where twenty/something's needed a place on the corner that changed the oil in their cars we were doomed . . ." -NickDG Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Zep 0 #9 May 19, 2012 Yeah right, maybe they'll get it sorted out or NASA and the CIA just don't want private enterprise in space. Gone fishing Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
faulknerwn 37 #10 May 20, 2012 We have several jumpers at my dz who work for spacex in tx. I've been up to their location and watched several testf fires. It's very cool being able to watch from a couple hundred feet away. Can't wait to find out the scoop on what went wrong Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lawrocket 3 #11 May 21, 2012 Quote Yeah right, maybe they'll get it sorted out or NASA and the CIA just don't want private enterprise in space. Pad aborts are nothing new. Gemini 6 had a pad abort with Schirra and Stafford. STS-41D had a pad abort (immediately after which Steve Hawley said, "I thought we'd be a lot higher at MECO.") - Discovery's first scheduled launch. SpaceX said the problem was a valve. The next attempt is at 3:44 a.m. Eastern Time tomorrow. My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wmw999 2,150 #12 May 21, 2012 Given that they're blasting stuff off into space (think about really, really big explosions and fires), there are an amazing number of things that have to happen. Computers make it possible to check and see if they're right. sometimes things go wrong adn the launch would have been OK on that day, given all the conditions -- but if the computer says it's out of spec, then the launch is aborted anyway. If you think htat's a pity, and that if the launch might have gone right the computers should be ignored or reset, consider that what if htat's the day that the conditions weren't perfect for the launch to be OK even with the "minor" malfunction. Then everyone reads about the explosion on teh pad in teh newspaper, or they read about the launch that ended up in teh drink (that's why they launch from FLorida -- problems end up in teh ocean, and not in Utah or something). Wendy P.There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lawrocket 3 #13 May 21, 2012 Oh, absolutely. This rocket stuff is tough business. Just thinking of engineering materials that can withstand the cryogenic temps of LOX, as well as the thousands of degrees once it ignites. Just mind blowing! Better to have the small failure than the spectacular one, I think. My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
piisfish 135 #14 May 22, 2012 it flies scissors beat paper, paper beat rock, rock beat wingsuit - KarlM Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites