nolhtairt

Members
  • Content

    918
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Feedback

    0%

Everything posted by nolhtairt

  1. Here's one... a female Democrat accused of sexual harassment... https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/top-democratic-candidate-drops-out-of-kansas-race-after-facing-sexual-harassment-allegations/ar-BBGMIm4?li=BBnbfcL
  2. 'The RNC resumed supporting Alabama Senate candidate Roy Moore' Well, we now know the true colors of the R's of this country; as if there was any real doubt. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/elections/rnc-jumps-back-alabama-senate-race-after-trump-endorses-roy-n826496 Jerry Baumchen I'm a Republican and I'm still not voting for that tard.
  3. Do you honestly not realize how utterly absurd this sounds to a rational person? Obviously you haven't watched the Supernatural TV series. Good stuff.
  4. Co-authored only six years ago by a lawyer/judge. Who is nominated by trump and confirmed by republicans to be ....wait...wait... US ATTORNEY GENERAL. Jeff Sessions? He didn't co-author that textbook with Roy Moore.
  5. A few years ago I would have replied yes, now no. We are seeing where DNA is revealing miscarriages of justice. I'd support expedited capital punishment only in cases where there is clear DNA evidence of guilt. In decades old cases where such evidence isn't clear, no. Define clear? The academy award winning documentary “Murder on a Sunday morning” is a great movie if you’re interested on how easy it is to convict the wrong person in a murder. Even with an eyewitness and a confession. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=vK0RX4Wh1tE Although DNA evidence weren't required in Timothy McVeigh's and the DC Sniper's cases, the evidence otherwise were overwhelming. They both were put to death in what, 6 or 7 years following their convictions, by the federal death penalty. Good riddance.
  6. A few years ago I would have replied yes, now no. We are seeing where DNA is revealing miscarriages of justice. I'd support expedited capital punishment only in cases where there is clear DNA evidence of guilt. In decades old cases where such evidence isn't clear, no.
  7. He should resign. Moore should withdraw. Agree fully on both. I was just picking on you since you seem to call out the Republican scumbags. Not so much the other party's scumbags.
  8. Don't be so sure on that. The latest poll has him trailing by somewhere above 10 points. http://insider.foxnews.com/2017/11/15/new-poll-shows-roy-moore-trailing-democrat-doug-jones-12-points Note the source for both the linked story and the poll. Kinda hard to put that one down as a "fake poll" from the "liberal media". Personally, I think it would be funny as all hell if he lost. For a variety of reasons. The reaction from him afterwards would be worth it. A nuclear meltdown probably. Of course he'll probably sue everybody he can.
  9. It wasn't just the consensual act with Monica. There are plenty of women that have accused him of sexual assault back in his days as Arkansas Governor and before.
  10. And I just saw a video of a 19 year old Demi Moore french kissing a 15 year old boy and talking nonchalantly about it, plus the boy seemed happy. Of course he would be. Every dude out there would be going hell yeah boy! Then reverse the genders, and I don't have to tell you what the reaction is going to be.
  11. It's definitely enough to make people think about the ramifications of voting him into office.
  12. That's because your party put a President into power who is a self admitted sex offender and now everyone has had enough. This year will likely be remembered as the Year of the Sexual Predator Purge or something like that. The election of a clear sexual predator to US President is one factor. The exposure of Harvey Weinstein is another. I think this will be the "Year of Me Too". Women are coming forward like never before. All over the place. Roy Moore's claim that "you are a young girl and I'm a prosecutor, nobody will believe you" has been all too true for a long, long time. Look at how Trump's accusers were treated. By the same token, look at how Bill Clinton's accusers were treated. Same thing, except the women were adults.
  13. Really? That's what you think? Did you feel the same way when the stories about Bill Cosby came out? Or do women only lie about powerful white conservative men? It's knowing they will not be believed that mostly keeps them silent. You missed a word. No he didn't. There are scumbags in both political parties.
  14. It's too late to remove Roy Moore from the ballot in next month's election, and people are still gonna vote for him regardless.
  15. The sad thing is, Roy Moore continues to be stubborn. He ain't backing down. It's also too late for his name to be removed from the ballot in next month's election, but there is another way... The Senate can vote to kick him out before he can serve. I believe there is precedence. So far, he's 0-2 on not finishing a term of service he was elected to... he's gonna be 0-3. Fuck Roy Moore.
  16. Everyone gets it, you're just making fun of a kid for believing in Santa Claus at this point. This is the guy who called out Florida and Texas being punished by hurricanes for voting Republican in last year's elections. The guy has issues. Omniscient, omnipotent, words have meaning (unless uttered by Trump). Yeah well, he's your president, like it or not. Better than the alternative...
  17. Everyone gets it, you're just making fun of a kid for believing in Santa Claus at this point. This is the guy who called out Florida and Texas being punished by hurricanes for voting Republican in last year's elections. The guy has issues.
  18. It's certainly your choice to carry it or not, within the laws. But... ask yourself this: is it better to have it and not need it, or to need it and not have it?
  19. You're not good enough shots to hit the bad guy every time but you are good enough to not hit any of the good guys, despite the hail of bullets from multiple directions in a crowded space? Is there a specific location in the church you envision the gunman standing to enable you to safely unleash this crossfire? Some churches will have a foyer between the front door and the pews. Standing or sitting in the corner of the worship area nearest the foyer would give you a line of sight clear of the last row of seats. Aim for the gunman before he reaches the pews. If there's no foyer and the entrance opens directly into the worship area like you'll often see in small churches, you'll still have some room between the front wall and the last row of seats.
  20. Which is a fucking ridiculous state of affairs. Where do we live; the Middle East? Ooooooookay then, let's hear YOUR idea of dealing with that kind of nutjob hellbent on killing and maiming anybody he sees. What are you gonna do? Probably cower on the floor and get shot anyway.
  21. Now it's coming out the church shooter was an atheist.
  22. About the only thing I can think of to counter shooters who come into churches and starts spraying bullets, is to have a person trained in firearms on guard inside near the entrance, off to the side. Might have time to cut the gunman down before he gets even close to emptying his gun of bullets. The Texas church gunman started shooting at the church from outside. If they had such a guard inside, he would have had time to prepare for the gunman coming into the church.
  23. The motive of the mass shooting at the church in Texas is starting to look more and more like it stemmed from a domestic dispute between the gunman and his ex in-laws. And he targeted the church where his mother in law attended. So religion had nothing to do with it. He picked an easy target to exact his revenge. And he was a real fucking asshole. Killed a lot of innocent people for no reason other than to say "fuck you" to his ex in-laws. Sick son of a bitch. The obvious trolls can leave religion out of this one.