mrshutter45

Members
  • Content

    3,134
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Feedback

    0%

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. mrshutter45

    DB Cooper

    As I mentioned before in the document I posted. the evidence is clearly marked with a letter. that chute is not and appears to describe a front chute. something is wrong somewhere but I don't think it's extra chutes. I have another document that states Cooper has a 28 foot chute NB6. then they list a front chute 24' white with "NORM D" inscribed on the front. this was in reference to a chute found in 2001.
  2. mrshutter45

    DB Cooper

    Has anyone asked the skydivers if the NB6 would have a 24' round in it? 24' sound like a front chute.. The problem I see with the document I posted is one chute is not lettered as evidence. it's basically showing 3 chutes on the plane but only two listed as evidence..
  3. mrshutter45

    DB Cooper

    As I mentioned on TMN. the 302 could be wrong. most of the info matches except they state 24 foot in length not diameter and the model being 1960...
  4. mrshutter45

    DB Cooper

    Cossey packed all four chutes. he could be laying claim that way. many people do this. store manger will say "my store" cops will ask you " what are you doing in my town" etc. neither owns the store or the town...
  5. mrshutter45

    DB Cooper

    None of this belongs here...just more drama.
  6. mrshutter45

    DB Cooper

    I stand fully behind my statement and will now return to a place where one doesn't have to constantly engage in drama. I'm researching the DB Cooper case. I do this as a hobby. I'm not looking for fortune or fame. I'm looking for answers to a decades old mystery. this creates a road block into that avenue.
  7. mrshutter45

    DB Cooper

    I appreciate your comments. however, you are incorrect about me being impatient about the photo's. Mr. Blevins posted that the event was cancelled. that's when I made a comment that the ground view would benefit the case. Robert then replied he might go later in the year. Eric chimed in saying he would go in two weeks and try and get the photo's he wanted as well. I didn't ask anyone to go in the first place. I only suggested pics would be a benefit. Eric already has a plan in place. it doesn't require petty trespassing. Some of us choose not to work with certain people due to strong negative behavior that reached out far beyond the internet. most I'm sure you are not aware of in which I would gladly show you offline if required. In my view. the damage can not be repaired. it is what it is. If not mistaken, I don't want to speak for Eric, but I believe he has a purpose for being in the area. that's why he decided to go. Roberts main goal appears to be searching the area. Eric's goal is pictures and might need them before that time. the bottom line was. nobody was going to the location when I first posted. now, it appears only one is allowed?
  8. mrshutter45

    DB Cooper

    Then you shouldn't of asked me to begin with?
  9. mrshutter45

    DB Cooper

    Robert, I'm sorry, but I don't watch any of your video's anymore. haven't for a long time. I have no interest in believing anything can be found around the placard. you can look but I'm sure nothing will be found. hunters are in the area constantly. if they found a tiny card. the odds would of been greater finding larger objects. R99 believes Cooper was a no pull on Caterpillar island. I disagree with that as well and feel looking there would be pointless since thousands have been on that island after 1971. If you are that thirsty for people to join. try the local avenues..newspaper, television. tell them what you are doing. they eat that stuff up..
  10. mrshutter45

    DB Cooper

    You made a long post discussing other members. even though you didn't use names. it still doesn't belong here per the admins post recently. I simply pointed this out just as you did to Derek several times about spamming and multiple posts. what happens on other forums are no concern to this forum. unless it has to do with the case. that's the rules Meso set. not me. it's a DB Cooper forum. if you have an issue with that board. I suggest you take it up with them vs posting the problem here. it's pretty simple.
  11. mrshutter45

    DB Cooper

    Nope, simply pointing out that you are violating the rules set here. 2-3 paragraphs worth.
  12. mrshutter45

    DB Cooper

    Actually, you and Derek fail to post under the rules the admin. has given. and failing to "ignore" things as well that don't belong here. "You're welcome to discuss the case here, but posts that are not related to the case and merely address other users are not what this thread is for, and we will start handing out more warnings to posts that violate this approach."
  13. mrshutter45

    DB Cooper

    It's done.....move on...
  14. mrshutter45

    DB Cooper

    Actually, you posted that it was cancelled due to the lack of interest in Cooper fans and no one wanting to go. it was unanimous that they wanted to go to Oregon? I seen that post dated just last nite and I said it would be a benefit to the case to get pics from the ground. you replied saying maybe later this year. then Eric posted he was going to do it and it became my fault you wasted time on this today? I mentioned early into this that it really had nothing to do with you. and it had nothing to do with me either. Eric responded to my post. It's DONE....
  15. mrshutter45

    DB Cooper

    I think the dart might have better odds. the only thing the placard shows is it's under the airway 305 was on. and it was found against the wind. the location itself is in question since 7 years passed before it was found. nothing proving it's been there that long. the path isn't exact on the map so that makes things even more difficult. what if it drifted miles over the 7 years, nobody knows. Yes, lots of variables.