Broke 0 #1 December 8, 2005 if you put 2 still cameras on both sides of your helmet one the same bite switch do you think that you could make a steriogram?Divot your source for all things Hillbilly. Anvil Brother 84 SCR 14192 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
freefalle 0 #2 December 8, 2005 okay, Ill appear stupid whats a steriogram? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The111 1 #3 December 8, 2005 Hey Chuck. Click here. I don't see why it wouldn't work in a skydive. I seem to remember having this discussion somewhere and maybe even seeing an example. But maybe I'm crazy.www.WingsuitPhotos.com Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
freefalle 0 #4 December 8, 2005 QuoteHey Chuck. Click here. I don't see why it wouldn't work in a skydive. I seem to remember having this discussion somewhere and maybe even seeing an example. But maybe I'm crazy. Ah thanks. I dont see why it wouldn't work hmmmm sounds like an interesting project. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The111 1 #5 December 8, 2005 There was a guy in the Keys with two HC-1's (you read that right) on his head. I think the idea was mounting at the right angles to get some sort of 3-D type final product. Not sure of the specifics.www.WingsuitPhotos.com Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LouDiamond 1 #6 December 8, 2005 Well I imagine it might work for you if you were naturally cross eyed, otherwise I don't see it being practical. All of the stereographic images and maps I have looked at required you to wear a special pair of glasses to make it work correctly and effciently.If it was anywhere practical and feasable to do in film, without wearing special eyewear, I am positive Hollywood would have been all over it like a fat kid on birthday cake."It's just skydiving..additional drama is not required" Some people dream about flying, I live my dream SKYMONKEY PUBLISHING Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The111 1 #7 December 8, 2005 It's just a fun little gimmick, it will always require two pictures, and forcibly (or naturally) crossing your eyes. Another downside is the pictures can't be very large (since you can't cross your eyes very far). But you have to admit it's kind of neat when you get it in focus. Except for the headache...www.WingsuitPhotos.com Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mccordia 73 #8 December 8, 2005 Caren Alink at teuge (NL) has done some experiments with 3D (shooting with 2 camera's) http://home.hccnet.nl/tom.kan/3d/index.htmlJC FlyLikeBrick I'm an Athlete? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Broke 0 #9 December 8, 2005 You don't need to be cross eyed. In theory you should be able to merdge the imiges with your eyes to make them appear 3-D. I am not talking about the steriograms that are like find the hidden picture, but I am looking the kind that have been around since the thirties if memory serves me right. I think it could be pretty cool.Divot your source for all things Hillbilly. Anvil Brother 84 SCR 14192 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
newshooter12 0 #10 December 9, 2005 aligning them seems to me to be the hardest part... especially farther away from each other on the sides of the helmet. the top like i've seen still setups for and the one CaTo has from the one post look easier to line up. http://www.harbortronics.com has some still setups for stereo imagery matt Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LouDiamond 1 #11 December 20, 2005 Here is something that is the real deal for what your talking about http://www.planar.com/products/flatpanel_monitors/stereoscopic/stereoscopic.cfm"It's just skydiving..additional drama is not required" Some people dream about flying, I live my dream SKYMONKEY PUBLISHING Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
