quade 4 #151 October 1, 2009 QuoteIf the post commander had tracked the guy down and decided to do nothing (not even notify the police to the arson), would it still be vigilantism? Depends on what actions he takes to track the guy down. In a lot of states it might violate stalking laws. For instance, somebody way earlier floated the idea that maybe the VFW guy took down the license plate number and tracked him down using that. I don't know anything about NY laws regarding that type of action, but in California a person is not allowed to do that simply by calling up the DMV. It might be possible to hire a licensed private detective to do it, but I think a lot of people make false statements to the DMV to try to get around it; for instance, lie about a hit and run.quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nanook 1 #152 October 1, 2009 Quote Quote I defer back to my previous post where I stated that had a law been broken that the authorities would have acted accordingly against the VFW Commander. Since that has not happened, logic dictates that the VFW Commander did not break the law. That's not a logical conclusion. BTW, did you learn what circular logic means, yet? The newspaper reports said that the police were very aware of this. Logical conclusions and fallacies of argument are philosophical and academically sterile positions used for purposes of arguments and debates happening on paper and role-playing scenarios and theories. They do not apply to real life applications. We are not arguing a paper or a theory here; we are arguing a true event. When arguing across these planes, these fallacies cannot be used to discount an argument. What happened happened and no law was broken. No amount of claims of fallacies on your side will ever be applicable._____________________________ "The trouble with quotes on the internet is that you can never know if they are genuine" - Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jcd11235 0 #153 October 1, 2009 QuoteWhat happened happened and no law was broken. No amount of claims of fallacies on your side will ever be applicable. Are you saying that you've never seen the police turn a blind eye to a crime? Really? I've seen it many times. To conclude that no law was broken because the police did nothing is not just faulty logic; it's naïve.Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 4 #154 October 1, 2009 So, you really do believe that if a rape victim doesn't press charges no rape was committed?quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nanook 1 #155 October 1, 2009 QuoteTo conclude that no law was broken because the police did nothing is not just faulty logic; it's naïve. To conclude that the police tuned a blind eye is faulty logic. It appeals to your argument, not known facts._____________________________ "The trouble with quotes on the internet is that you can never know if they are genuine" - Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nanook 1 #156 October 1, 2009 QuoteSo, you really do believe that if a rape victim doesn't press charges no rape was committed? nope. Can you really tell me exactly, footstep for footstep how the two parties talked, the way they talked, the medium they used to talk, the way they came to the concusion, who was present during that time and the actual transcripts of the communication?_____________________________ "The trouble with quotes on the internet is that you can never know if they are genuine" - Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nanook 1 #157 October 1, 2009 You both say something illegal happened. It is up to you guys to give some sort of evidence that it happened, not me._____________________________ "The trouble with quotes on the internet is that you can never know if they are genuine" - Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jcd11235 0 #158 October 1, 2009 QuoteQuoteTo conclude that no law was broken because the police did nothing is not just faulty logic; it's naïve. To conclude that the police tuned a blind eye is faulty logic. It appeals to your argument, not known facts. I assumed nothing; you did. I simply called you on it.Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jcd11235 0 #159 October 1, 2009 QuoteYou both say something illegal happened. It is up to you guys to give some sort of evidence that it happened, not me. I said the commander exercised vigilantism. I also said that I am not aware if there are laws against vigilantism in that particular jurisdiction. In other words (to make it easy for you to comprehend), I didn't accuse the post commander of committing a crime. I said he showed a lack of respect for the rule of law (and the Constitution, since he said was avenging flag burning aspect instead of the vandalism aspect). I've offered sufficient support for that claim.Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nanook 1 #160 October 1, 2009 Your quote: QuoteIt's disappointing to see that the VFW post commander has so little respect for the rule of law and the Constitution that he once swore to defend that he would act as a vigilante You assumed first. vitilantism is a crime. QuoteTo disgrace the American flag, we can't tolerate that," it shows that he places higher priority on a symbol than he does the first amendment. That's a big assumption. You don't know the guy. Quote Vigilantes tend to be cowards, IMO. VERY wrong assumption here. . . Quote He wanted vengeance, not justice. Putting words in the Post commander's mouth. Assumption. ect. ect. Lots of assumptions on your part here. You started the assumption game. We can react with assumption games because our position was initally strong and didn't bear the requirement of backing it up since we didn't make a claim against it._____________________________ "The trouble with quotes on the internet is that you can never know if they are genuine" - Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
D22369 0 #161 October 1, 2009 So why can't I get a fully armed apache helicopter *** cuz you havent filled out the correct form FA-012.12ZS7 once you have fully filled this out and it has been processed your pre-approved loan for 42 million will be accepted. Roy PS: at least you dont want one of those piece of shit blackhawks... have a great day They say I suffer from insanity.... But I actually enjoy it. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
warpedskydiver 0 #162 October 1, 2009 Quote Quote You just don't get it, so lets just accept that and move along. BTW I would not go into a VFW and try to convince them of your viewpoint. You would not receive a warm welcome. Which is completely irrelevant as far as the law is concerned. Yep never mind common sense and self preservation. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jcd11235 0 #163 October 1, 2009 Quote vitilantism [sic] is a crime. In that jurisdiction, it might be. Since I don't know what the laws are in that jurisdiction, I choose not to make that assumption. You can if you wish. QuoteQuoteTo disgrace the American flag, we can't tolerate that," it shows that he places higher priority on a symbol than he does the first amendment. That's a big assumption. You don't know the guy. You're right I don't know the guy. I stand by my statement, nonetheless. QuoteQuote Vigilantes tend to be cowards, IMO. VERY wrong assumption here. . . 10/10 irony score for you. QuoteQuote He wanted vengeance, not justice. Putting words in the Post commander's mouth. Assumption. If he wanted justice, he would have utilized the justice system. It's not like he was trying to keep the incident a secret. If he wanted compensation, he would have sought restitution via money or labor. He didn't seek these things. He stated he couldn't tolerate someone burning the flag. He sought vengeance for that action. Nonetheless, if you have an alternate reasonable explanation to explain everything, I'm all ears. Why do you think he did it?Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LouDiamond 1 #164 October 1, 2009 HAHA!! Classic! I rest my case, you both proved my point. Have a good evening everyone."It's just skydiving..additional drama is not required" Some people dream about flying, I live my dream SKYMONKEY PUBLISHING Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jcd11235 0 #165 October 1, 2009 QuoteHAHA!! Classic! I rest my case, you both proved my point me wrong. Have a good evening everyone. You too. (And, you're welcome for the correction.)Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LouDiamond 1 #166 October 1, 2009 Quote Quote HAHA!! Classic! I rest my case, you both proved my point me wrong. Have a good evening everyone. You too. (And, you're welcome for the correction.) "It's just skydiving..additional drama is not required" Some people dream about flying, I live my dream SKYMONKEY PUBLISHING Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jcd11235 0 #167 October 1, 2009 Quote Quote Quote HAHA!! Classic! I rest my case, you both proved my point me wrong. Have a good evening everyone. You too. (And, you're welcome for the correction.) I really don't care. I just find it humorous that you've continually ignored every point made counter to your argument and then used illogical arguments and put words in my mouth (and others'), only to finally claim that you proved your point. You "proved" nothing, except that you couldn't (for whatever reason) argue your position on its merits.Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lefty 0 #168 October 1, 2009 Little did I know that when I swiped that candy bar from the grocery store when I was four that I was the victim of vigilantism! I should have demanded my right to a trial by a jury of my peers, yet the lynch mob (store employees) tracked me down (a lady there was friends with my mom), took justice into their own hands, and said an apology would do. Fiends! Stalkers! Vigilantes!Provoking a reaction isn't the same thing as saying something meaningful. -Calvin Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
warpedskydiver 0 #169 October 1, 2009 He is playing "I touched you last" The same sort of person that dares someone to strike them so they can call the police. It is all a game to them until reality sets in. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jcd11235 0 #170 October 1, 2009 Quote Little did I know that when I swiped that candy bar from the grocery store when I was four that I was the victim of vigilantism! I should have demanded my right to a trial by a jury of my peers, yet the lynch mob (store employees) tracked me down (a lady there was friends with my mom), took justice into their own hands, and said an apology would do. Fiends! Stalkers! Vigilantes! If that were anything like the situation being discussed, it would be relevant. Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lefty 0 #171 October 1, 2009 Funny, I thought it was obvious enough. Did the sarcasm throw you off?Provoking a reaction isn't the same thing as saying something meaningful. -Calvin Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jcd11235 0 #172 October 1, 2009 QuoteFunny, I thought it was obvious enough. Did the sarcasm throw you off? I think it was the lack of corresponding actions between the two events.Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Krip 2 #173 October 1, 2009 Hi W, Lou Thank you for your serviceOn some subjects a simple poll would cut thru a lot of BS. This is one of them. REMF's One Jump Wonder Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jcd11235 0 #174 October 1, 2009 Quote REMF's LMAO Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nanook 1 #175 October 1, 2009 QuoteNonetheless, if you have an alternate reasonable explanation to explain everything, I'm all ears. Why do you think he did it? Don't need to have an alternate explaination. Sometimes the simplest explaination is best. It's there. You claim its vigilantism by definition of blacks law. I claim it isn't. No 8th Amendment rights have been denied. I claim a win/win scenario happened here._____________________________ "The trouble with quotes on the internet is that you can never know if they are genuine" - Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites