0
rushmc

Does Obama have a fucking clue?

Recommended Posts

Quote





He knows what he is doing, he is doing what he thinks is right, but he doesn't have a FUCKING clue what the true consequences of his policies are.

......if he were an Islamic plant, he would definitely know the true consequences of his policies.

Do your part for global warming: ban beans and hold all popcorn farts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>will be supporting his minions.

I want minions.

>if he were an Islamic plant, he would definitely know the true
>consequences of his policies.

IT'S ALL TRUE! HE'S AN ILLEGAL ALIEN ISLAMIC PLANT GAY SOCIALIST COMMUNIST TERRORIST-PALLER-AROUND-WITH! WITH MINIONS!

Run! Buy guns and ammo! Head for the hills or Obama will come and getcha and GRAB YOUR GUNS!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Indeed, he knows what he is doing. He is tearing down a system that created the most powerful and wealthy nation on the Earth...

Do we deserve this? Not people like me who work for a living and will be supporting his minions.

However, I digress.

He knows what he is doing, he is doing what he thinks is right, but he doesn't have a FUCKING clue what the true consequences of his policies are.

;)



+1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Also, whatever you do, do not respond at the door when the census-taker comes. They are gathering information that will be used to put you in re-education camps. Those who can't be re-educated...well...you know.

People up here did get a little excited when the cenus-takers took gps coordinates at each house they visited.
Do your part for global warming: ban beans and hold all popcorn farts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

>will be supporting his minions.

I want minions.

>if he were an Islamic plant, he would definitely know the true
>consequences of his policies.

IT'S ALL TRUE! HE'S AN ILLEGAL ALIEN ISLAMIC PLANT GAY SOCIALIST COMMUNIST TERRORIST-PALLER-AROUND-WITH! WITH MINIONS!

Run! Buy guns and ammo! Head for the hills or Obama will come and getcha and GRAB YOUR GUNS!

I would go with his communist mentors. Had this poor lad been given school vouchers instead of Islamic charity, he might have had a chance to become an American. You know, the beer drinking, gun loving, bible thumping type. Instead he ended up with a Koran and a funny middle name What makes you think he is gay?:P
Do your part for global warming: ban beans and hold all popcorn farts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Obams missed the boat big time to yet one more time seem popular with the world. Rolling over on the US and its historic postions yet one more time



What historic positions are you referring to? You mean the U.S sticking its nose in everybodies else's business and playing God all around the world? Yea, I'm really upset that he's missing the boat on that one then, and like you said it makes him more popular with the world's population, so I guess they're really upset about him missing the boat on this one too. If so many people support it and it makes him more popular, then it must be wrong, right? :S
Apologies for the spelling (and grammar).... I got a B.S, not a B.A. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

>will be supporting his minions.

I want minions.

>if he were an Islamic plant, he would definitely know the true
>consequences of his policies.

IT'S ALL TRUE! HE'S AN ILLEGAL ALIEN ISLAMIC PLANT GAY SOCIALIST COMMUNIST TERRORIST-PALLER-AROUND-WITH! WITH MINIONS!

Run! Buy guns and ammo! Head for the hills or Obama will come and getcha and GRAB YOUR GUNS!



Socialist: Of course.

Communist: Of course.

Using the phrase "Run! Buy guns and ammo! Head for the hills or Obama will come and getcha and GRAB YOUR GUNS!" to characterize people who are very concerned (with good reason) about the damage that this man and his party are doing to our country: just silly and a gross mischaracterization.

I could just as easily say "Quick! Vote for Obama! Otherwise you might have to get off your fat, lazy ass and work for a living! Your free handouts might go away! Your robbing of hard-working people's income to support your future fat, lazy, offspring might go away! You might have to learn what responsibility means! The horror!" Blah, blah, and on and on.

But I won't say that, because it would also be a gross mischaracterization.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You do realize that if there are less people around the world who want to kill us and if there are more people who like us and will therefore help us accomplish our foreign policy goals, the American people's safety and security will be increased, correct?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It would be nice if it were that easy, wouldn't it? Being liked and getting help accomplishing foreign goals aren't necessarily linked. Money and power motivate decision-makers. People who want to kill us will always want to kill us - it is in their breeding. There is no changing that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

People who want to kill us will always want to kill us - it is in their breeding. There is no changing that.



I disagree. As far as I know, the vast majority of Germans, Italians, and Japanese do not currently want to kill us.
See also: The British

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>Using the phrase "Run! Buy guns and ammo! Head for the hills or Obama will
>come and getcha and GRAB YOUR GUNS!" to characterize people who are very
>concerned (with good reason) about the damage that this man and his party are
>doing to our country: just silly and a gross mischaracterization.

I find it very funny that you agree with the socalist/communist slurs when applied to a political figure, but when a group of people is described as ammo-and-gun-hoarding (which has actually happened) wanting to leave (which some have said) and fearing a gun grab (which has been proven here by several posters) it's a "gross mischaracterization" - even though I have not claimed that those characteristics apply to any specific group.

But if you want a few specifics, here they are:

Stephen Baldwin said he would run away (leave the country) if Obama was elected. Many people on blogs across the US have echoed the sentiment.

There have been any number of pro-gun types talking about the "mass gun seizures" that Obama will implement. Indeed, at least two murderers have gone on shooting sprees fueled by their fears of Obama and/or gun seizures.

There has indeed been a run on guns and ammunition by fearful right-wingers who think such things will soon be illegal.

So that characterization is provably accurate for at least the extremists in the anti-Obama group.

You may, of course, decide to apply that description to any other group you choose. Your choice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>People who want to kill us will always want to kill us . . .

Really? So the Native Americans want to kill us? How about the Japanese, Germans and Italians? More recently, do you think the Russians want to kill us?

How about you? Do you still want to kill Japanese? (or at least imprison them permanently here in the US) If not, what changed?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes, he knows exactly what he is doing.

He has an agenda and is doing everything in his power to push it forward.

He ran a great campaign. He used buzz words people liked and generalities people could understand and get behind. He is so smooth it does not matter that in many cases he is doing the exact same thing Bush did... It is OK now, since Obama is doing it.

He knows exactly what he is doing....
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If you'll recall Timothy McVeigh, there are good ol' Americans who want to kill us as well.

No one can keep everyone happy all the time. However, it's a whole lot less expensive to try to keep enough people happy that we don't have to actively control and patrol them.

And even if we try to control and patrol them, we can't control everyone in any given population without killing them all off.

Most of us think that killing them all off is an unacceptable solution. Because there's always a new "them."

Wendy P.
There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I think it is naive to think there aren't portions of those populations who still want to kill us.



Which is why there have been so many British, German, Japanese, and Italian terrorist attacks on Americans recently? :S

And as bill pointed out, does this mean that you want to kill all of those people as well? After all, it's part of your breeding.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, yeah. But I was going for the financial angle :P

Wendy P.

There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0