rushmc 18 #1 May 16, 2007 ...before this hoax is exposed enough where they will have to start work on the next pending disaster http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30200-1265731,00.html?f=rss"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 3 #2 May 16, 2007 I think you may have missed the point of the article.quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
narcimund 0 #3 May 16, 2007 Quote More Proof GWing Alarmists are Running Out of Time... Is this an example of how you would like other people to use the word "proof"? First Class Citizen Twice Over Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NCclimber 0 #4 May 16, 2007 More than a few "darlings" of the movement are reconsidering their position. http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.Blogs&ContentRecord_id=927b9303-802a-23ad-494b-dccb00b51a12&Region_id=&Issue_id= Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NCclimber 0 #5 May 16, 2007 Quote Quote More Proof GWing Alarmists are Running Out of Time... Is this an example of how you would like other people to use the word "proof"? Using hyperbole to address hysteria seems fitting. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,478 #6 May 16, 2007 > I think you may have missed the point of the article. ssshhh, he's on a roll Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 3 #7 May 16, 2007 QuoteMore than a few "darlings" of the movement are reconsidering their position. http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.Blogs&ContentRecord_id=927b9303-802a-23ad-494b-dccb00b51a12&Region_id=&Issue_id= You really need to stop believing everything you read linked to by Drudge and especially when it links to anything associated with Inhofe. Inhofe is a shill for the oil companies and appointed by pawns of the oil companies. What he is doing with U.S. Government funds is criminal negligence.quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NCclimber 0 #8 May 16, 2007 Quote Quote More than a few "darlings" of the movement are reconsidering their position. http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.Blogs&ContentRecord_id=927b9303-802a-23ad-494b-dccb00b51a12&Region_id=&Issue_id= You really need to stop believing everything you read linked to by Drudge and especially when it links to anything associated with Inhofe. Bogus assumption on your part. Nice try. Quote Inhofe is a shill for the oil companies and appointed by pawns of the oil companies. While you may be right, it doesn't change the fact that... Quote more than a few "darlings" of the movement are reconsidering their position Cheers. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,478 #9 May 16, 2007 > More than a few "darlings" of the movement are reconsidering their position. Indeed they are. Heck, even Bush is starting to accept that it's a problem. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NCclimber 0 #10 May 16, 2007 Quote > More than a few "darlings" of the movement are reconsidering their position. Indeed they are. Heck, even Bush is starting to accept that it's a problem. You mean he's not just playing politics... responding to the latest polls... trying to boost his horribly low approval numbers??? Yeah. That's the ticket. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 3 #11 May 16, 2007 Quote Quote Quote More than a few "darlings" of the movement are reconsidering their position. http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.Blogs&ContentRecord_id=927b9303-802a-23ad-494b-dccb00b51a12&Region_id=&Issue_id= You really need to stop believing everything you read linked to by Drudge and especially when it links to anything associated with Inhofe. Bogus assumption on your part. Nice try. So it's simply a "coincidence" that the exact same link with your paraphrased "headline" is currently on the Drudge web site? Yeah . . . I believe you. Really.quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,478 #12 May 16, 2007 >You mean he's not just playing politics... responding to the latest >polls... trying to boost his horribly low approval numbers??? He may well be. But his actions (if he follows through) will result in some positive moves towards reducing our CO2 emissions. So if you think one's actions proceed from one's understanding, then he is starting to accept it as a problem. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
davedlg 0 #13 May 16, 2007 Quote>You mean he's not just playing politics... responding to the latest >polls... trying to boost his horribly low approval numbers??? He may well be. But his actions (if he follows through) will result in some positive moves towards reducing our CO2 emissions. So if you think one's actions proceed from one's understanding, then he is starting to accept it as a problem. You mean he is doing his JOB? The head of a democracy is listening to the overwhelming voice of the people?? I think this may be a first for Bush. How long did it take? 6 years? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,478 #14 May 16, 2007 > More than a few "darlings" of the movement are reconsidering their position. Another group reconsidering their position: --------- Petroleum Geologists Association changing its climate change tune 16 May 07 It seems that the American Association of Petroleum Geologists is softening its former hard-line stance on global warming. A new proposed position paper on their site contains a lukewarm acknowledgment of the role human activity and greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuels plays in the present warming. They state: "Humans, simply by virtue of the size of the world's population, represent a new agent of change through our significant modifications related to land use, urbanization, industrial activity, and through changes in atmospheric composition related to fuel combustion and deforestation." -------- I expect a scathing denunciation from the deniers who once considered these geologists their allies in their campaign against science. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NCclimber 0 #15 May 16, 2007 Quote Quote Quote Quote More than a few "darlings" of the movement are reconsidering their position. http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.Blogs&ContentRecord_id=927b9303-802a-23ad-494b-dccb00b51a12&Region_id=&Issue_id= You really need to stop believing everything you read linked to by Drudge and especially when it links to anything associated with Inhofe. Bogus assumption on your part. Nice try. So it's simply a "coincidence" that the exact same link with your paraphrased "headline" is currently on the Drudge web site? No coincidence. Drudge is where I found the story. That has no bearing on your claim that I believe everything that is linked to by Drudge, especially when the link goes to another Drudge page. Those little teasers have a tendancy of disappearing. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
speedy 0 #16 May 16, 2007 You are quite right, the GWing alarmists will sometime soon be put in their place. The scientists in the meantime will refine their models, adjust their predictions and we will get to the point where we can show :- 1) Any reduction on our current CO2 emissions will have very little impact in the global temperature 2) The planet is not 5 years away from disaster (your article quoted a non- scientist) 3) alternative energy sources to fossil fuels are required, with or without GWing 4) we should direct our financial and technological resources towards new energy sources and to protect the population from the effects of climate change Dave Fallschirmsport Marl Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
narcimund 0 #17 May 16, 2007 QuoteThe scientists in the meantime will refine their models, adjust their predictions and we will get to the point where we can show : If I read this right, you're saying you have more reliable information than "the scientists" and they'll eventually come to understand what you already know. Can you explain how you came by your conclusion? First Class Citizen Twice Over Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
speedy 0 #18 May 16, 2007 I can only say that this is the impression I got when reading realclimate.org. Are they not scientists? They admit that they really are a bit in the dark when trying guess what affect the current warming will have on things such as rainfall , storms and such. With each IPCC report, the amount of warming due is reduced. It seems obvious to me eventually the alarmist nature of press will in the end have to adhere to what the people at RC are saying. Dave Fallschirmsport Marl Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
narcimund 0 #19 May 16, 2007 QuoteI can only say that this is the impression I got when reading realclimate.org. Ah. You browse a blog. Given that, I now see that you're definitely qualified to announce that "the scientists" will eventually refine their investigative methods until they come to agree with you. Got it. First Class Citizen Twice Over Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 18 #20 May 16, 2007 QuoteI think you may have missed the point of the article. Not really, just making my own."America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 18 #21 May 16, 2007 QuoteQuoteMore than a few "darlings" of the movement are reconsidering their position. http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.Blogs&ContentRecord_id=927b9303-802a-23ad-494b-dccb00b51a12&Region_id=&Issue_id= You really need to stop believing everything you read linked to by Drudge and especially when it links to anything associated with Inhofe. Inhofe is a shill for the oil companies and appointed by pawns of the oil companies.QuoteNow this is a claim you should be asked to prove What he is doing with U.S. Government funds is criminal negligence."America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 18 #22 May 16, 2007 Quote Quote Quote More Proof GWing Alarmists are Running Out of Time... Is this an example of how you would like other people to use the word "proof"? Using hyperbole to address hysteria seems fitting. "America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
speedy 0 #23 May 16, 2007 QuoteQuoteI can only say that this is the impression I got when reading realclimate.org. Ah. You browse a blog. Given that, I now see that you're definitely qualified to announce that "the scientists" will eventually refine their investigative methods until they come to agree with you. Got it. That just shows that you are not very informed in this debate. Dave Fallschirmsport Marl Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
narcimund 0 #24 May 16, 2007 QuoteThat just shows that you are not very informed in this debate. If I browse a blog can I become omniscient like you are? First Class Citizen Twice Over Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 3 #25 May 16, 2007 QuoteQuoteInhofe is a shill for the oil companies and appointed by pawns of the oil companies.Now this is a claim you should be asked to prove Piffle. Look at who appointed him . . . Look at who his major contributors are . . . Look at his voting record . . . Done. Classic case of fox guarding the henhouse.quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
