Recommended Posts
QuoteQuote'The fighting has already been difficult. Aside from at least 87 U.S. soldiers, about 880 Iraqis have been killed this month — including more than 600 Iraqis — mostly civilians — in Fallujah, according to the city hospital’s director.'
How would you define a civilian since Iraq has no Army fighting against our troops?
Thanks for hijacking this post into political BS-rhetoric... fuck dude, start your own.
__________________________________________________
What would Vic Mackey do?
QuoteQuoteQuote'The fighting has already been difficult. Aside from at least 87 U.S. soldiers, about 880 Iraqis have been killed this month — including more than 600 Iraqis — mostly civilians — in Fallujah, according to the city hospital’s director.'
How would you define a civilian since Iraq has no Army fighting against our troops?
Thanks for hijacking this post into political BS-rhetoric... fuck dude, start your own.
Asking how he defines a civilian is hi-jacking a thread into political BS-Rhetoric? Whatever, Dude.....
Jeez. I mean, no big deal, thread creep is normal...
Crap, this makes three posts to this forum, which is three more than I ever meant to make. I'll shut the hell up now.
__________________________________________________
What would Vic Mackey do?
damion75 0
Semper Fi
But the British Army is better!
Seriously though - thumbs up to the USMC.
Not one shred of evidence supports the theory that life is serious - look at the platypus.
Vertifly 0
The Marine Corps was the most proficient work (or wartime) environment that I have ever experience. There is a good reason why it took about 1-year of civilian time for me to adjust back to the laid-back mentality of the world after getting out. Frankly, it isn't surprizing to see that these guys practice the best interests of our country (and do it proudly). That is what we were there for in the first Gulf issue and thats why we're there now. USMC will always continue to be a primary combat organization for the US. Helllllll yeah....represent..
Aoooorrrroooooooah!!
Kennedy 0
QuoteBut is it really that hard to believe that not every damn poor iraqi school boy and his mum are AK-flinging, RPG-hauling antiamericans???
Is it really that hard to believe that the few kids in the pictures were not "poor Iraqi school boys," but were AK-flinging, RPG-hauling antiamericans?
Is it really that hard to believe that they were armed and their still breathing comrades took the weapons to fight another day?
Is it really that hard to believe that maybe journalists were posing the bodies/scenes to achieve the desired effect? (afterall, it's not like that has been happening since cameras were invented or anything)
Guard your honor, let your reputation fall where it will, and outlast the bastards.
1*
Waaaaaaaaaa tired of the whiners and crybabys.
Taking out Saddam was necessary. You dont like Bush thats Your opinion but hes our Commander-n-Chief respect that. Dont like our men dying anymore than anyone else.
As far as some of the BS in Iraq ***NUKE***
Sometimes you gotta get mean in this world Plum MaDdog Mean.. Drive on
tbrown 26
QuoteI think that all that oppose the war have NO malice against the guys deployed.
They were sent there to do a job. It's the guys who sent them there that people have a problem with.
Right now we've got a girl living in our home whose boyfriend is a Marine in Iraq, his second tour. She just got a letter from him telling her how hard they'd been hit, with two dead and nine wounded. I remember this kid when he was in high school, playing bass in a crappy band. I pray every day that he'll come home to her and that Bush and Rummy and all the other big money draft dodging assholes who sent him there will all be gone by next Jan 20th.
And that's a big uh-huh.
Your humble servant.....Professor Gravity !
Which is why they haven't gone after Sadr's Shia like they've gone after the Baathists in Fallujah. You're right though, the US and Governing Council did drop the ball by letting Sadr become the figure he is.
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites