0
sundevil777

Is this Tsunami picture real?

Recommended Posts

its fake. the waves in a tsunami are never that close together due to the sheer volume of water involved. that photo shows the first wave hitting followed immediately by a second, much higher wave. it is generally accepted by tsunami specialists that the 3rd wave is the largest, and usually hits 3 to 8 minutes behind the 2nd wave (3 to 8 minutes between waves in a tsunami is the generally accepted timeframe).

As for me and my house, we will serve the LORD...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yeah, it's fake. Besides, the highest wave witnessed was about 30 feet high along the coast of Sumatra. The one show in this picture looks well over 100 feet... You'll only see waves that high if a big enough meteorite strikes somewhere in the middle of an ocean.

Then again, there have been cyclones that struck India (in the Indian Ocean, hurricanes are called cyclones), that brought waves of at least 50 feet... Hasn't happened in a long time though.
"Mediocre people don't like high achievers, and high achievers don't like mediocre people." - SIX TIME National Champion coach Nick Saban

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
pretty clearly fake....

Here are before (left) and after (right) satellite images of Aceh province, Indonesia.

/eta: a few interesting tidbits...

The magnitude 9.0 earthquake that triggered the tsunamis shifted the Earth's axis of rotation by 8cm, and shortened the length of a day by .0001 seconds

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Actually, a tsunami's period can range from 3 to 90 minutes.

Quote

its fake. the waves in a tsunami are never that close together due to the sheer volume of water involved. that photo shows the first wave hitting followed immediately by a second, much higher wave. it is generally accepted by tsunami specialists that the 3rd wave is the largest, and usually hits 3 to 8 minutes behind the 2nd wave (3 to 8 minutes between waves in a tsunami is the generally accepted timeframe).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

pretty clearly fake....

Here are before (left) and after (right) satellite images of Aceh province, Indonesia.

/eta: a few interesting tidbits...

The magnitude 9.0 earthquake that triggered the tsunamis shifted the Earth's axis of rotation by 8cm, and shortened the length of a day by .0001 seconds



Really? Do you have a reliable source for that? Conservation of angular momentum would imply that a shift of rotation axis can only be caused by an external influence.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Yeah, it's fake. Besides, the highest wave witnessed was about 30 feet high along the coast of Sumatra.



Hmmm - not entirely sure this is true. You seen any film of tow-in surfing recently? If you want to see some incredible stuff - whatch billabong oddysey. I reckon the waves those guys are on are at least 30 feet.
Never try to eat more than you can lift

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

/eta: a few interesting tidbits...

The magnitude 9.0 earthquake that triggered the tsunamis shifted the Earth's axis of rotation by 8cm, and shortened the length of a day by .0001 seconds



Not sure about this. An article in last weeks EOS stated that while earthquakes do shift the rotation axix and can change LOD, the shifts that would have been induced would have been too small to measure. However, the mainstream media glossed over that point....
Scars remind us that the past is real

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Really? Do you have a reliable source for that? Conservation of angular momentum would imply that a shift of rotation axis can only be caused by an external influence.



That's why there was a shift of the axis and a change in the rotational period. Angular momentum is still conserved.

My source is Aviation Week & Space Technology, it's in print or I'd post a link. They site NASA for the calculations. NASA uses spacecraft tracking stations all over the globe, and their station in Singapore evidently moved a considerable amount to the west.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Really? Do you have a reliable source for that? Conservation of angular momentum would imply that a shift of rotation axis can only be caused by an external influence.



That's why there was a shift of the axis and a change in the rotational period. Angular momentum is still conserved.

My source is Aviation Week & Space Technology, it's in print or I'd post a link. They site NASA for the calculations. NASA uses spacecraft tracking stations all over the globe, and their station in Singapore evidently moved a considerable amount to the west.



How is "rotation axis" defined? Moved with respect to what? Once influences of the Sun and Moon's gravity are factored out, the rotation axis must pass through the Earth's center of mass. Did the center of mass shift 8cm? With respect to what?
.
.
www.freak-brother.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

How is "rotation axis" defined? Moved with respect to what? Once influences of the Sun and Moon's gravity are factored out, the rotation axis must pass through the Earth's center of mass. Did the center of mass shift 8cm? With respect to what?



My understanding isn't perfect, perhaps someone else will chime in, but here's my take on it. It has to do with Chandler Wobble.

Essentially if you have a big spherical thing and you're spinning it, its net rotation is going to be slower the more wobble it has. This is because wobble increases the body's effective moment of inertia. If you have a dramatic geological event, you can shift the axis of rotation such that wobble is reduced, thereby decreasing the effective moment of inertia.

As you mentioned before, without help from the outside, you can't change angular momentum, so a reduction in moment of inertia means faster rotation.

Now, what exactly does an "8cm shift in the axis of rotation mean"? Possibly something to do with the diameter of the Chandler Wobble, but I can't say for sure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0