sundevil777 94 #1 January 17, 2005 I received this from a friend, it looks fake to me. Any info?People are sick and tired of being told that ordinary and decent people are fed up in this country with being sick and tired. I’m certainly not, and I’m sick and tired of being told that I am Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ahegeman 0 #2 January 17, 2005 Not real.--------------------------------------------------------------- There is a fine line between 'hobby' and 'mental illness'. --Dave Barry Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bigway 4 #3 January 17, 2005 it looks like the wave from 'the day after tomorrow .Karnage Krew Gear Store . Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AggieDave 6 #4 January 17, 2005 Snopes says no. http://www.snopes.com/photos/tsunami/tsunami2.asp--"When I die, may I be surrounded by scattered chrome and burning gasoline." Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sundevil777 94 #5 January 17, 2005 Thanks, enough said.People are sick and tired of being told that ordinary and decent people are fed up in this country with being sick and tired. I’m certainly not, and I’m sick and tired of being told that I am Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
crotalus01 0 #6 January 17, 2005 its fake. the waves in a tsunami are never that close together due to the sheer volume of water involved. that photo shows the first wave hitting followed immediately by a second, much higher wave. it is generally accepted by tsunami specialists that the 3rd wave is the largest, and usually hits 3 to 8 minutes behind the 2nd wave (3 to 8 minutes between waves in a tsunami is the generally accepted timeframe). As for me and my house, we will serve the LORD... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AggieDave 6 #7 January 17, 2005 And Snopes shows the original pic, a picture of the coastline of Chili. They drive on the left in Thailand as well...--"When I die, may I be surrounded by scattered chrome and burning gasoline." Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CrazyIvan 0 #8 January 17, 2005 QuoteAnd Snopes shows the original pic, a picture of the coastline of Chili. They drive on the left in Thailand as well... Dude, Chili is food, Chile it's a country. __________________________________________ Blue Skies and May the Force be with you. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AggieDave 6 #9 January 17, 2005 Huh...that's what I get for writting that post right before dinner.--"When I die, may I be surrounded by scattered chrome and burning gasoline." Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
blondeflyer7 0 #10 January 17, 2005 Looks fake to me Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BillyVance 34 #11 January 17, 2005 Yeah, it's fake. Besides, the highest wave witnessed was about 30 feet high along the coast of Sumatra. The one show in this picture looks well over 100 feet... You'll only see waves that high if a big enough meteorite strikes somewhere in the middle of an ocean. Then again, there have been cyclones that struck India (in the Indian Ocean, hurricanes are called cyclones), that brought waves of at least 50 feet... Hasn't happened in a long time though."Mediocre people don't like high achievers, and high achievers don't like mediocre people." - SIX TIME National Champion coach Nick Saban Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
champu 1 #12 January 17, 2005 pretty clearly fake.... Here are before (left) and after (right) satellite images of Aceh province, Indonesia. /eta: a few interesting tidbits... The magnitude 9.0 earthquake that triggered the tsunamis shifted the Earth's axis of rotation by 8cm, and shortened the length of a day by .0001 seconds Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
eJAKAL 0 #13 January 17, 2005 Actually, a tsunami's period can range from 3 to 90 minutes. Quoteits fake. the waves in a tsunami are never that close together due to the sheer volume of water involved. that photo shows the first wave hitting followed immediately by a second, much higher wave. it is generally accepted by tsunami specialists that the 3rd wave is the largest, and usually hits 3 to 8 minutes behind the 2nd wave (3 to 8 minutes between waves in a tsunami is the generally accepted timeframe). Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
penniless 0 #14 January 17, 2005 Quotepretty clearly fake.... Here are before (left) and after (right) satellite images of Aceh province, Indonesia. /eta: a few interesting tidbits... The magnitude 9.0 earthquake that triggered the tsunamis shifted the Earth's axis of rotation by 8cm, and shortened the length of a day by .0001 seconds Really? Do you have a reliable source for that? Conservation of angular momentum would imply that a shift of rotation axis can only be caused by an external influence. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Stumpy 256 #15 January 17, 2005 QuoteYeah, it's fake. Besides, the highest wave witnessed was about 30 feet high along the coast of Sumatra. Hmmm - not entirely sure this is true. You seen any film of tow-in surfing recently? If you want to see some incredible stuff - whatch billabong oddysey. I reckon the waves those guys are on are at least 30 feet.Never try to eat more than you can lift Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jumper03 0 #16 January 17, 2005 Quote/eta: a few interesting tidbits... The magnitude 9.0 earthquake that triggered the tsunamis shifted the Earth's axis of rotation by 8cm, and shortened the length of a day by .0001 seconds Not sure about this. An article in last weeks EOS stated that while earthquakes do shift the rotation axix and can change LOD, the shifts that would have been induced would have been too small to measure. However, the mainstream media glossed over that point....Scars remind us that the past is real Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
champu 1 #17 January 17, 2005 QuoteReally? Do you have a reliable source for that? Conservation of angular momentum would imply that a shift of rotation axis can only be caused by an external influence. That's why there was a shift of the axis and a change in the rotational period. Angular momentum is still conserved. My source is Aviation Week & Space Technology, it's in print or I'd post a link. They site NASA for the calculations. NASA uses spacecraft tracking stations all over the globe, and their station in Singapore evidently moved a considerable amount to the west. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Billy 0 #18 January 17, 2005 Saw something on the Science channel about the shift... it dropped enough mass closer to the axis to speed up rotation a smidge for a while... Natural Born FlyerZ.com Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
freakbrother 0 #19 January 17, 2005 QuoteQuoteReally? Do you have a reliable source for that? Conservation of angular momentum would imply that a shift of rotation axis can only be caused by an external influence. That's why there was a shift of the axis and a change in the rotational period. Angular momentum is still conserved. My source is Aviation Week & Space Technology, it's in print or I'd post a link. They site NASA for the calculations. NASA uses spacecraft tracking stations all over the globe, and their station in Singapore evidently moved a considerable amount to the west. How is "rotation axis" defined? Moved with respect to what? Once influences of the Sun and Moon's gravity are factored out, the rotation axis must pass through the Earth's center of mass. Did the center of mass shift 8cm? With respect to what?. . www.freak-brother.com Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mjosparky 3 #20 January 17, 2005 QuoteQuoteAnd Snopes shows the original pic, a picture of the coastline of Chili. They drive on the left in Thailand as well... Dude, Chili is food, Chile it's a country. And his name is Dave not Dude! SparkyMy idea of a fair fight is clubbing baby seals Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
champu 1 #21 January 18, 2005 QuoteHow is "rotation axis" defined? Moved with respect to what? Once influences of the Sun and Moon's gravity are factored out, the rotation axis must pass through the Earth's center of mass. Did the center of mass shift 8cm? With respect to what? My understanding isn't perfect, perhaps someone else will chime in, but here's my take on it. It has to do with Chandler Wobble. Essentially if you have a big spherical thing and you're spinning it, its net rotation is going to be slower the more wobble it has. This is because wobble increases the body's effective moment of inertia. If you have a dramatic geological event, you can shift the axis of rotation such that wobble is reduced, thereby decreasing the effective moment of inertia. As you mentioned before, without help from the outside, you can't change angular momentum, so a reduction in moment of inertia means faster rotation. Now, what exactly does an "8cm shift in the axis of rotation mean"? Possibly something to do with the diameter of the Chandler Wobble, but I can't say for sure. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites