lawrocket 3 #1 October 18, 2006 I heard an opposing counsel call himself a "man's man" today. It occurred to me that a "Man's Man" would, by definition, be gay, for he is possessed by another "Man." Saying you're a "Man's Man" is the equivalent of a man saying, "That's my man." Not that there's anything wrong with that, although I should probably no longer refer to other dudes as "My Man." It's like false advertising. Now, a "Lady's Man" would be a guy who has a significant other who is a Lady. So I guess I am a "Lady's Man." I am OWNED! My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Frenchy68 0 #2 October 18, 2006 What does that make Batman? "For once you have tasted Absinthe you will walk the earth with your eyes turned towards the gutter, for there you have been and there you will long to return." Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lawrocket 3 #3 October 18, 2006 I'd respond, but I wouldn't want to get banned for breaking the forum rules. My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Muenkel 0 #4 October 18, 2006 QuoteWhat does that make Batman? Simply put...Robin's man. And the jury is still out on the gender of Robin. Chris _________________________________________ Chris Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
angrypeppers 1 #5 October 18, 2006 The greatest superhero ever? BIFF! SMACK! POW!Burn the land and boil the sea, You can't take the sky from me. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cudlo 0 #6 October 18, 2006 interesting... so possession dictates sexual orientation.. hrm.. slaves were gay?_________________________________________ "People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid." - Kierkegaard Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Icon134 0 #7 October 18, 2006 wow... this post explains so much... Livin' on the Edge... sleeping with my rigger's wife... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jtval 0 #8 October 18, 2006 Lawrocket was correct. It would make him(BATMAN) a pedophile. Sure robin was in college but do you think Batman let him be a "caped crusader" without a few years of intense training?My photos My Videos Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
warpedskydiver 0 #9 October 18, 2006 QuoteLawrocket was correct. It would make him(BATMAN) a pedophile. Sure robin was in college but do you think Batman let him be a "caped crusader" without a few years of intense training? No wonder he didn't want to slide down Bruce Waynes Batpole anymore! I bet Alfred had to by alot of BPH(Bat Preperation H) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
