LongWayToFall 0 #276 April 24, 2011 Not gunna happen tonight. Monday, for sure. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
masterrig 1 #277 April 24, 2011 Bummer! Noone can say that the Canadiens aren't trying. Then too, they've always had a lot of try. I'd reallylike to see L.A knock-off San Jose in the series! Chuck Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CanuckInUSA 0 #278 April 24, 2011 QuoteNoone can say that the Canadiens aren't trying. I caught the end of the game plus the two OT periods. Definitely a highly contested affair. Both teams had their chances to win the game in the first OT, but lady luck wanted to see the game go into the 2nd OT period. I can't believe some of the things I am reading about the game (not here on this site). There are definitely some spoiled partisan fans out there. I doubt they are Leaf fans (Leaf fans are used to losing LOL) but some people are saying Horton's goal was a cheap goal, etc, etc, etc. Partisan morons. It was a shot from the point, a rebound resulted and a Boston player was in the right place at the right time to put away the rebound. That's hockey. Nothing cheap about that goal. Keep your stick on the ice and go to the net. That's what they have been telling kids for eons. BTW ... it ain't over until it's over. Go Habs Go. Try not to worry about the things you have no control over Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
masterrig 1 #279 April 24, 2011 QuoteQuoteNoone can say that the Canadiens aren't trying. I caught the end of the game plus the two OT periods. Definitely a highly contested affair. Both teams had their chances to win the game in the first OT, but lady luck wanted to see the game go into the 2nd OT period. I can't believe some of the things I am reading about the game (not here on this site). There are definitely some spoiled partisan fans out there. I doubt they are Leaf fans (Leaf fans are used to losing LOL) but some people are saying Horton's goal was a cheap goal, etc, etc, etc. Partisan morons. It was a shot from the point, a rebound resulted and a Boston player was in the right place at the right time to put away the rebound. That's hockey. Nothing cheap about that goal. Keep your stick on the ice and go to the net. That's what they have been telling kids for eons. BTW ... it ain't over until it's over. Go Habs Go. That comes with the territory... partisan-ism... conspiracy theories and so-on. What really bothers me is, with all the video and viewers able to replay games on their t.v.'s, they will relate what happened completely opposite to what really happened. I didn't watch the game but from what you say, it was a fair and square goal. That's hockey. As for the Habs, I really believe, they can pull it out and win the series. It's been too long! This is just a tough play-offs, throughout the League. It's all the parity brought about by Gary Bettman. I'm of the opinion, the salary cap is really messing things up throughout the League. I really do wish, Bettman would be replaced. I can't stand that little weasel with the Napoleonic complex. Chuck Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
masterrig 1 #280 April 24, 2011 That goal by Boston, last night, reminds me of the 'infamous' Brett Hull goal that beat the Red Wings in the play-offs a few years ago in extra over-time. To this day, Hull refuses to discuss it. He knew it, the refs knew it was a bad 'goal'. I think, the refs just wanted to end the game and go home. Too bad there was no 'review' back then. Chuck Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CanuckInUSA 0 #281 April 24, 2011 QuoteThat goal by Boston, last night, reminds me of the 'infamous' Brett Hull goal that beat the Red Wings in the play-offs a few years ago in extra over-time. To this day, Hull refuses to discuss it. He knew it, the refs knew it was a bad 'goal'. I think, the refs just wanted to end the game and go home. Too bad there was no 'review' back then. Chuck Well that depends on how you interpret the rules. There is no denying Hull's skate was in the crease. The rules at the time said "no skates in the cease". If you want to be strict, then yes the goal should not have been allowed. But from a hockey point of view, it was a goal. He kicked the puck to his stick and shot the puck in the net. Go back in any time in hockey history and this goal is allowed. It was only during this time frame where the league had this strict "no skates in the crease" rule where it was questioned. If anything good that came from that goal, was that the NHL came to their senses and modified the rule. Try not to worry about the things you have no control over Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
masterrig 1 #282 April 24, 2011 That is the best response I've heard in regard to that goal. Thank you! This past season, I have seen more interpretations of the 'crease rule'... especially against Holmstrom!Chuck Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
murrays 0 #283 April 24, 2011 Absolutely nothing wrong with Horton's goal. Habs were robbed by Thomas shortly before and in regulation a couple of times...most notably by Ryder I think it was who made a glove save on a int blank shot when Thomas was down and out. All I can hope for now is a Game Seven.-- Murray "No tyranny is so irksome as petty tyranny: the officious demands of policemen, government clerks, and electromechanical gadgets." - Edward Abbey Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
murrays 0 #284 April 24, 2011 Go Sabres! Up 1-0 early in the first!-- Murray "No tyranny is so irksome as petty tyranny: the officious demands of policemen, government clerks, and electromechanical gadgets." - Edward Abbey Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
masterrig 1 #285 April 24, 2011 I had to miss the game but I appreciate you telling of it. I hope there's a game-7, too and of course... the Habs come-out the winner of the series! Chuck Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
masterrig 1 #286 April 24, 2011 Tied-up... goin' to over-time. I just want to see the Sabres knock those bums off!!! Chuck Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
masterrig 1 #287 April 24, 2011 Well... Crap! They have one last shot at it! Chuck Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
murrays 0 #288 April 25, 2011 Like one of the announcers said...the Flyers are vampires, you have to put a stake through their heart to kill them. I hope Ryan Miller can play one of his super exceptional games and the Sabres can pull off the upset. Congrats to the Predators for winning their first ever playoff series. It was a very exciting game that I managed to watch most of. On a sad note, that may be the last game played by Teemu Selanne, one of the classiest and most exciting players of the last 20 years. He can still play...he had 6 goals in the series...but it could be the end of the road for him. Chicago-Vancouver tied at 2 in the second. Go Hawks!-- Murray "No tyranny is so irksome as petty tyranny: the officious demands of policemen, government clerks, and electromechanical gadgets." - Edward Abbey Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
masterrig 1 #289 April 25, 2011 Good for the Preds. That's probably who the Wings will face. I hope,the Wings can do better against them than they did in the regular season. Geeze... another over-time game. Chicago is headed that way. I'd really like to see Chicago put Vancouver away. We'll see! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CanuckInUSA 0 #290 April 25, 2011 Hawks win ... game #7 here we come. Try not to worry about the things you have no control over Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
masterrig 1 #291 April 25, 2011 Quote Hawks win ... game #7 here we come. Ya' beat me to it! Persistance, does pay off! Chuck Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
murrays 0 #292 April 25, 2011 Quote Quote Hawks win ... game #7 here we come. Ya' beat me to it! Persistance, does pay off! Chuck Looks like the Canucks have no choice but to start Luongo. I haven't heard but it sure looked like Schneider has a serious leg injury. After losing the start and then coming in to lose the game I wonder about his confidence. I've always felt Luongo was pver-rated and these playoffs haven't shown me anything to make me change my mind. Should be good one!-- Murray "No tyranny is so irksome as petty tyranny: the officious demands of policemen, government clerks, and electromechanical gadgets." - Edward Abbey Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
masterrig 1 #293 April 25, 2011 Quote Quote Quote Hawks win ... game #7 here we come. Ya' beat me to it! Persistance, does pay off! Chuck Looks like the Canucks have no choice but to start Luongo. I haven't heard but it sure looked like Schneider has a serious leg injury. After losing the start and then coming in to lose the game I wonder about his confidence. I've always felt Luongo was pver-rated and these playoffs haven't shown me anything to make me change my mind. Should be good one! Seems like, Luongo is good in short bursts but not the long-haul. The Blackhawks seem to have more for the long-haul. Tonight, Chicago didn't seem cohesive. Sloppy passes and give-aways but they pulled-out a win. They just might have the Canucks on their heels. Chuck Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ifell 0 #294 April 25, 2011 QuoteQuoteQuoteNoone can say that the Canadiens aren't trying. As for the Habs, I really believe, they can pull it out and win the series. It's been too long! Chuck Too long since what? They made to the 3rd round last year! Oh and I am pretty sure that Hull goal was vs. the Sabres in 1999, hell of a game! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites skybytch 259 #295 April 25, 2011 Quote Skybytch heckled me yesterday at the DZ, wearing her Sharks hat too. Ha ha. Take that girlfriend! I learned my lesson. No more heckling prior to playoff games. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites masterrig 1 #296 April 25, 2011 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteNoone can say that the Canadiens aren't trying. As for the Habs, I really believe, they can pull it out and win the series. It's been too long! Chuck Too long since what? They made to the 3rd round last year! Oh and I am pretty sure that Hull goal was vs. the Sabres in 1999, hell of a game! I was referring to the Habs winning The Cup. Also, that 'questionable goal was Dallas v Detroit in the 4th. round. Chuck Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites CanuckInUSA 0 #297 April 25, 2011 Quotethat 'questionable goal was Dallas v Detroit in the 4th. round. I thought the Hull goal you were talking about was the one in the finals, in OT, versus the Sabres, that won the Cup for the Stars. This is the one where by a fraction of an inch Hull's left skate was in the crease as he shot the puck into the net to win the Cup. From a pure hockey point of view I see no problem calling this a goal. But if one wants to strictly interpret the rules, Hull's skate was in the crease and the goal should have been called back. Definitely a controversial time in NHL history. Try not to worry about the things you have no control over Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites masterrig 1 #298 April 25, 2011 I have been searching for the goal Hull scored against the Wings that he will not talk about that won the Stars that series. It happened about the 3rd. over-time. The re-play showed it was not a goal and the ref called it a goal. I'm trying to find the year and series round. No luck yet. Hull did have a 'questionable' goal against Buffalo in 1999. Chuck Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites LongWayToFall 0 #299 April 26, 2011 Commence heckling. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites ifell 0 #300 April 27, 2011 Lots of heat and controversy tonight in Mtl as the habs force a game 7! Go Habs Go! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next Page 12 of 24 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0 Go To Topic Listing
skybytch 259 #295 April 25, 2011 Quote Skybytch heckled me yesterday at the DZ, wearing her Sharks hat too. Ha ha. Take that girlfriend! I learned my lesson. No more heckling prior to playoff games. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
masterrig 1 #296 April 25, 2011 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteNoone can say that the Canadiens aren't trying. As for the Habs, I really believe, they can pull it out and win the series. It's been too long! Chuck Too long since what? They made to the 3rd round last year! Oh and I am pretty sure that Hull goal was vs. the Sabres in 1999, hell of a game! I was referring to the Habs winning The Cup. Also, that 'questionable goal was Dallas v Detroit in the 4th. round. Chuck Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites CanuckInUSA 0 #297 April 25, 2011 Quotethat 'questionable goal was Dallas v Detroit in the 4th. round. I thought the Hull goal you were talking about was the one in the finals, in OT, versus the Sabres, that won the Cup for the Stars. This is the one where by a fraction of an inch Hull's left skate was in the crease as he shot the puck into the net to win the Cup. From a pure hockey point of view I see no problem calling this a goal. But if one wants to strictly interpret the rules, Hull's skate was in the crease and the goal should have been called back. Definitely a controversial time in NHL history. Try not to worry about the things you have no control over Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites masterrig 1 #298 April 25, 2011 I have been searching for the goal Hull scored against the Wings that he will not talk about that won the Stars that series. It happened about the 3rd. over-time. The re-play showed it was not a goal and the ref called it a goal. I'm trying to find the year and series round. No luck yet. Hull did have a 'questionable' goal against Buffalo in 1999. Chuck Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites LongWayToFall 0 #299 April 26, 2011 Commence heckling. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites ifell 0 #300 April 27, 2011 Lots of heat and controversy tonight in Mtl as the habs force a game 7! Go Habs Go! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next Page 12 of 24 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0
CanuckInUSA 0 #297 April 25, 2011 Quotethat 'questionable goal was Dallas v Detroit in the 4th. round. I thought the Hull goal you were talking about was the one in the finals, in OT, versus the Sabres, that won the Cup for the Stars. This is the one where by a fraction of an inch Hull's left skate was in the crease as he shot the puck into the net to win the Cup. From a pure hockey point of view I see no problem calling this a goal. But if one wants to strictly interpret the rules, Hull's skate was in the crease and the goal should have been called back. Definitely a controversial time in NHL history. Try not to worry about the things you have no control over Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
masterrig 1 #298 April 25, 2011 I have been searching for the goal Hull scored against the Wings that he will not talk about that won the Stars that series. It happened about the 3rd. over-time. The re-play showed it was not a goal and the ref called it a goal. I'm trying to find the year and series round. No luck yet. Hull did have a 'questionable' goal against Buffalo in 1999. Chuck Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LongWayToFall 0 #299 April 26, 2011 Commence heckling. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ifell 0 #300 April 27, 2011 Lots of heat and controversy tonight in Mtl as the habs force a game 7! Go Habs Go! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
