DiggerDan

Thought I was making that same point, but I guess that just proves how people will listen to anybody!

Nah. I say start low. That way you can really determine where the sweet spot is. You can't find that without digging out of the corner first.

Couldn't agree more! I had my doubts that she was going to be able to hold her off, but such strength and power from Paula in the closing miles to take all of the kick out of Wambi. Awesome to watch.

I like to start right at 697 feet, but vary that by 3.7 to 98.4 feet, depending on conditions. I think it is best to start low and see how it goes. Then raise the starting height of your turn if you find that you are too low.

Some chubby kid who looks like he is 12 and talks like he is 4? And this is actually a hit! http://myspacetv.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&videoid=12768890

She's just another nappy-headed ho!

Them ho's ain't even that nappy headed!

The Forerunner 205 and 305 are awesome! I live in a very residential area where my Forerunner 201 would lose signal quite often, but with my 205, I NEVER do. It is amazingly accurate and a great training tool with so much info and feedback. The new design is sweet, and the ability to have 4 different data screens displayed simultaneously is fantastic. But if you live in a city with tall buildings, then NO personal GPS will work very well. Spring for the 305. Even if you only use the HR monitor once in a great while, it is worth it at time of purchase for the small additional cost. The 205/305 are a must-have for any runner! Just way too much great info and motivation on your wrist for a small amount of money to not have one, IMO.

I hope the decision to seperate landing areas was made.

Well, I can count 2 times in my driving career that had I been on a motorcycle instead of in a car, I would probably have been killed. I don't like those odds.

But you calling me a "dick," I suppose, is fine.

Well thank you SO much for clearing that up! But I think we have already been over the WHY people say to label it NSFW. You just said the same thing again that I agrued with the first time. Thank God you are not a moderator! That is a SCARY thing to think about, getting banned and all!

Sad.

Wow, your girls are nice! When did you have the operation?

Well then, I would guess that about HALF of the posters on here have bad manners then. I am certainly not the first person to come up with the idea.

Did you have Windows 2.0 before that? I hope it is WAY better.

Anyone have it? Thoughts?

I don't know, but I really think you should label your thread NSFW because you used profanity. Somene could get fired over that!

Apparently, there is some unwritten rule where you have to make sure you disclose "NSFW" so that people don't get caught looking at stuff they shouldn't be at work. Yet, there is apprently NO unwritten rule that people should have to be responsible enough to not open links they are unsure of, or be surfing the Bonfire at work, even though they know the type of junk that is posted in the Bonfire on a daily basis.

But, but, just look at the way number 3 defies gravity!

Sure, no prob. What I find interesting is that if these people you are referring to, whom surf at work and could get fired if they look at something that is "NSFW," open links that they are not sure of. I mean, if you KNOW you are not supposed to look at certain things on the internet, I would think it would be a good idea not to open links in the Bonfire, here on dz.com, a forum and site that continually proves just how disgusting, crass, obnoxious and tasteless people can be on the internet. I mean, shit, seems to me that the Bonfire is really generally "NSFW." I hear what you are saying, but I just find it interesting. I personally think, the person surfing the internet in an environment where they could get in trouble for looking at certain things, really should police themselves. But that is just my opinion. All that said, I will never set such a "trap" again.

Nope, I guess I really don't have to label it NSFW. Wouldn't be NEAR as funny if I did.

I am having trouble deciding which of these 3 I like best. What do you think? 1, 2 or 3? NSFW

Nope, not you. Don't think we have ever crossed paths. But then again, if we were both off in a corner, we wouldn't.

Yeah, I remember someone pointing out one of the regular, cheesey posters on here to me at a boogie, and I was like, "Huh?? THAT is Mr. In-your-face, out-spoken, "cool guy" from dz.com??" He was off in a secluded area and looked like the total opposite of the social ladder in person then on here. I think everyone is a little different online. It's funny to see. I have met alot of people who are nowhere NEAR as out-spoken in person as they are behind a computer screen.