KidWicked

I have no idea. If you don't care about the subject, why are you replying? To make others think the same thing rather than argue aimlessly on the interwebz But some people are just born this way...it's in their nature to argue. It makes them feel good no matter how repulsivly wrong their actions are. Who are you to voice your opinion and attempt to change their sick mind? What, you mean like the quote in my sig? Coreece: "You sound like some skinheads I know, but your prejudice is with Christians, not niggers..."

LOL. Really? That's *all* there is to it? LMFAO Coreece: "You sound like some skinheads I know, but your prejudice is with Christians, not niggers..."

I'm guessing she'll take up golf so she can begin her search for the real killer. You know, I've been searching for an OJ reference in this case that I can use on my day job as a radio guy. That line may actually be worth doing. Awesome. You'll be doing your part to continue to promote the idea that radio shows like yours are an intellectual wasteland. Coreece: "You sound like some skinheads I know, but your prejudice is with Christians, not niggers..."

Why suppress your inner feelings of desire? Coreece: "You sound like some skinheads I know, but your prejudice is with Christians, not niggers..."

Great, that makes two of us. I wish others others saw the humor in it. Like I said, I applaud your confidence in publicly proclaiming your underlying bisexuality. Coreece: "You sound like some skinheads I know, but your prejudice is with Christians, not niggers..."

you posted a whopping two liner in that one. Consider me unimpressed, still. And suspicious that you're someone's ghost identity. Most of your posts are useless "+1" posts, or attack someone without offering any countering information. Consider you unimpressed? Oh no!! Coreece: "You sound like some skinheads I know, but your prejudice is with Christians, not niggers..."

pretty funny shit coming from you, who has never contributed to any thread. You posted 13 times in the thread on the cost of the Afghanistan war that I started. You started the Afghanistan war? Pretty impressive.

pretty funny shit coming from you, who has never contributed to any thread. You posted 13 times in the thread on the cost of the Afghanistan war that I started. is this an example of your contributions? Another pointless one liner? How is starting a thread which created a long discussion (and which I participated in) not contributing? Like I said, it was a thread in which you yourself posted several times. Can you now explain how your claim that I have "never contributed to any thread" is not false? Coreece: "You sound like some skinheads I know, but your prejudice is with Christians, not niggers..."

pretty funny shit coming from you, who has never contributed to any thread. You posted 13 times in the thread on the cost of the Afghanistan war that I started. Coreece: "You sound like some skinheads I know, but your prejudice is with Christians, not niggers..."

You're making it obvious how frustrated and upset you are, and the sense of powerlessness you feel. Coreece: "You sound like some skinheads I know, but your prejudice is with Christians, not niggers..."

I think it's pretty funny seeing you calling someone out about luck vs. skill, but of course that was my point in asking the question. Ban away! And I hope it makes you feel better about yourself. (...but I'm sorry, it won't.) Coreece: "You sound like some skinheads I know, but your prejudice is with Christians, not niggers..."

Uh huh. Would you like to try and refute any of his arguments or do you literally have nothing to contribute to this thread. Nothing to refute what he said. It's how he said it. We've done what we needed to do. Time to get out. Still makes you wrong. LOL, ok. Feel free to believe whatever you want to believe. Coreece: "You sound like some skinheads I know, but your prejudice is with Christians, not niggers..."

Flown your canopy into any trees lately? Coreece: "You sound like some skinheads I know, but your prejudice is with Christians, not niggers..."

You see a parallel between the civil rights movement and the war in afghanistan? Coreece: "You sound like some skinheads I know, but your prejudice is with Christians, not niggers..."

Agree, only if your corrupt asshats in Chicago are included or will they goon there way around this? Do you think the inclusion or exclusion of Chicago in such matters could possibly have any effect on the sheer size of the numbers that we're talking about? It would be less than a rounding error. Or did you just want to make a vaguely political jab? You strike me as someone who prefers to be told what to think. Coreece: "You sound like some skinheads I know, but your prejudice is with Christians, not niggers..."

Your mom should have hired you a math tutor. Blues, Dave When 10 years really does arrive maybe he'll post his 11 or 12 year thread When the post was first done, I remember thinking WTF the Afganistan war started before 9/11! I had to go and check the dates (Oct 01). Whether it's 10 years or 9, it doesn't refute his argument does it. No one in this thread has been able to do that so far. Coreece: "You sound like some skinheads I know, but your prejudice is with Christians, not niggers..."

Uh huh. Would you like to try and refute any of his arguments or do you literally have nothing to contribute to this thread. Coreece: "You sound like some skinheads I know, but your prejudice is with Christians, not niggers..."

Congrats! You have almost eclipsed the quote from you that's in my sig. But I have to say, I applaud your courage to admit to the world that you are bisexual. Coreece: "You sound like some skinheads I know, but your prejudice is with Christians, not niggers..."

Your claim that science is "all politics" is... amusing. Coreece: "You sound like some skinheads I know, but your prejudice is with Christians, not niggers..."

In the formative years of a child's development they may receive warm fuzzies or cold pricklies. If they are given an abundance of cold pricklies over warm fuzzies they will learn to accept negative attention as normal. I always figured it was from parents just straight out ignoring them and they do anything for attention. Pretty sad. Ad hominem. You're the sad one. Ummm. . .Duh? You really think this thread is worthy of some debate rules? There's no win with a twerpy response to a rule-break. How convenient for you! What a surprise. Coreece: "You sound like some skinheads I know, but your prejudice is with Christians, not niggers..."

And therein lies the big issue. The political issue. And, above all, the subjective issue. You think science is subjective? Coreece: "You sound like some skinheads I know, but your prejudice is with Christians, not niggers..."

In the formative years of a child's development they may receive warm fuzzies or cold pricklies. If they are given an abundance of cold pricklies over warm fuzzies they will learn to accept negative attention as normal. I always figured it was from parents just straight out ignoring them and they do anything for attention. Pretty sad. Ad hominem. You're the sad one. Coreece: "You sound like some skinheads I know, but your prejudice is with Christians, not niggers..."

You must feel very powerless in this discussion (presumably due to your inability to construct a compelling competing argument), because you feel the need to indulge in these retribution fantasies. Just over 400 bikes showing love and support-no Jim Browns or kidwickeds to state your opinions. sounds like lack of conviction on your part. No fantasy sweetheart, I just know how my world works. I'm sure it will be very comfortable for you, since there will be no dissenting opinions that contradict how you prefer to see the world. Coreece: "You sound like some skinheads I know, but your prejudice is with Christians, not niggers..."

So, are we invading Saudi Arabia next week? And that has what to do with success/failure in Afghanistan? We didn't go into Afghanistan in the name of human rights. We went there out of a matter of national security to hunt down terrorists in the name of making the world a safer place, which it has failed to do, especially for Afghans. To claim that removing the government in the name of human rights makes the mission successful is like claiming that we went to Vietnam because "Charlie don't surf"! The violence and discrimination against women in Afghanistan, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, and Iran have little to do with the government. It has to do with religion, tradition, sociology, and beliefs. Even installing a "democracy" won't change that because the government will simply reflect the social values of the people. Hence, how dare we claim that our definition of "human rights" is any better than anyone else's when we can't agree domestically on gay marriage, abortion, and the death penalty. It so much easier to define for others what's right and wrong when we can drop bombs on them when we can't even work it out for ourselves, peacefully. Very well said. Coreece: "You sound like some skinheads I know, but your prejudice is with Christians, not niggers..."

Well said. There has barely been an attempt to refute the claims made in the first post, presumably because people realize the futility of doing so. Coreece: "You sound like some skinheads I know, but your prejudice is with Christians, not niggers..."