dmcoco84

Big difference between a private company having data that I agree to do business with (subject to legally obtained warrants), like which he ridiculously describes (VISA), and what the Federal Government it ACTUALLY doing. And it is quite clear that no one on this board has been listening to Drake or Binney; NSA Whistle blowers. That entire interview is a slap in the face... And the administration has already done that which he states would be his "red line."

Oracle CEO Larry Ellison told CBS News’ Charlie Rose that he has no problem with the NSA’s massive surveillance programs. In fact, he said, the surveillance is “great” and “essential.” Douche Bag

Same here; Virginia. Not as big a pile as 17 trillion dollars.

How old are you, and where do you live? I'm very puzzled by you... ... and you are quite obsessed with "280 million".

You are right, which is why in those places people don't feel the need to do either of those things. Whatever... you are full of it. Like I said previously to a Canadian: I don't care about your country (other than for BASE)... Mind Your Business.

Additionally... WWII never would have happened, because Wilson wasn't President, so WWI never happened, and Hitler never would have happened... because no Wiemar Republic. And don't forget about the push for a Caliphate coming back in the middle east... no Barbary wars, so they got stronger too. However, at the same time, no guns, is different from no right to guns by non military...

You equate... "there is no such thing as peaceful freedom", toooo, everyone needs a gun?

uh... huh. Dude... that's ridiculous. Completely empty statement, and I do...

What?! And who has said everyone needs guns? I sure haven't... And, propaganda?

Han Solo's blaster >> Kirk's phaser. Especially the model that just looked like a small makeup box. Both Those Punks < < Phaser Rifle Picard > > Kirk

I'm sure you meant blasters. Let's not mix canons here. Your mom has a blaster. Phasers are better than blasters, but light sabers are cooler than phasers. Your cold hand comment was hilarious, btw.

Yeah, cause phasers were invented.

Reagan was a Progressive. Fuck Reagan... And the stupid BS you just posted.

lol

Tell that to the people in Luby's Diner. Or the students at VaTech. Or the folks at Hartford Dostributors in Mass. Or the victims of Fort Hood. Educate yourself. It'll save you embarassment. Agree totally. Thats why there should be 0 guns. Not just no AR-15s. Well said Kennedy. It would be a lot harder to hurt 71 people with a pointy stick or nunchucks. Until some crazy mofo goes MS-13 style with dual machetes or katanas (AFTER setting off IEDs)... could easily kill a shit load of people at close range in a dark theater; and with enough distance not to be tackled. But you're a Delusional-ist... oh well.

To each (State) their own...

Nataly... The reason you see this issue as you do, is because of your complete absence of the necessary foundation; the knowledge regarding American Foundational principles, and the principles of liberty. I'm not criticizing you... 6ish years ago, I was in the same sinking boat. It's ok... you, myself, nor anyone else is stupid for it, where in many cases, not learning that information was intentional by those controlling your/my education; like some of the massive lies I learned at Kempsville High School, which angers me greatly. You just need to be willing to learn... and use critical thinking. And I love the fact that you live in France now. If you have that desire, you need to read: As stated on this board before, "On Killing and On Combat" by Dave Grossman. - On Killing: The Psychological Cost of Learning to Kill in War and Society - On Combat: The Psychology and Physiology of Deadly Conflict in War and in Peace After you read these, there is a third book, that covers every issue regarding firearms that has been posted on this board... it too is written by Dave Grossman, but his name is not on the cover; so though he wrote about 98% of it, you won't find it by an amazon/google search. In addition, I stated that you clearly do not understand Limited Government and Federalism. You are not only wrong about the differentiation between a right, law, and privilege... but also, that bearing arms, is not a right. Self Defense, is a Natural Right... it is a self evidence truth, where the men of the convention later passed an amendment to ensure that bearing arms to protect against tyranny (AND ALL THE OTHER NEEDS satisfied with them), was never to be infringed upon. But like with my thread, "It is Time to Repeal the First Amendment", just like with the Second Amendment, the First is not necessary... the first amendment could be repealed with every single person in the USA agreeing, and freedom of speech would still be secure under the Constitution. Freedom of Speech... is a Natural Right. To understand this, you first need to read: - Two Treatises of Government Natural Rights are self evident truths under the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God. Without understanding these IDEAS, one can not understand the American system of government. Period. Even if you are an atheist, Natural Rights still exist... rights that come from our humanity... however Benjamin Franklin and George Washington 100% believed in God and that our rights come directly from God, where we then lend them to government to protect. The purpose of government is to protect those rights: "That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men" And if you haven't read it in my other posts... the Pursuit of Happiness, was changed from Property. Benjamin Franklin, a staunch Abolitionist, had Jefferson change it to prevent the south from claiming that their slaves were their "property." Slavery was NEVER a right, and Frederick Douglass, after he ACTUALLY read the Constitution, called it a Glorious Liberty document. Additionally... happiness, does not mean joy. I would also recommend reading the American Classic Series: - The Real Benjamin Franklin - The Real George Washington - The Real Thomas Jefferson When you are done... both by R.J. Pestritto: - American Progressivism: A Reader - Woodrow Wilson and the Roots of Modern Liberalism The USA began to become the "World's Policeman", under Teddy Roosevelt... the man who started the Progressive party and was the first Progressive President; a Republican. While FDR and Wilson, were in the other party... for, Progressivism is a cancer that has infected both parties... an ideology that is the absolute antithesis of Limited Government, based on Natural Law. Or, you can do like most others on this board: continue the D vs R game (even though Washington sternly warned us about parties, before those two even existed), only read things/books you already agree with, instead of reading everything you can find... make threads like this one, and continue to stand on the sinking boat. Yes... I need my AR-15. "You" have no right to take it from me. And hopefully sooner than later, we can dial back all the other Federal overreaches.

NECESSARY ... EVIL Yeah...................... government With the one we have, under the Constitution, is like no other.

Wraps up with a buncha climate change bull shit... and the last paragraph being: "We've got to get floods. We've got to get a hurricane to move up in our country and just saturate everything to replenish the aquifer," he said. "Because when the water is gone. That's it. We're gone." Well, you are in luck! Because climate change causes floods and hurricanes... so there will be one along in no time. Where then we can say climate change destroyed everything and we need to take action against climate change. Psst... Bull Shit Article.

Looks to me like you fucked up, bucko!

1) Three years of drought 2) DECADES of overuse 3) AND NOW... fracking. 4) Don't forget about climate change. Oh Fuck Off.

Awww, isn't that cute. Because none of the other bull shit you tried to present stuck... its now about too much water; this won't stick either. And now I'll read the article.

You clearly do not understand Limited Government and Federalism. Speed limits, are a State right... illegal Federally. However, when the Federal government did illegally established national speed limits, it was because of "shortages", not safety or speed dangers.

You just make that up? You have any ballistics data to back that up? Any statistical analysis of fatalities due to firearm or caliber types? Didn't think so. Oh come on, seriously? Do you think that guy who shot people in a cinema would have hit 71 people and killed 12 had he been armed with a glock instead of an AR-15? Really? Don't think so. Well, you think wrong. Sheriff Debunks Gun Magazine ‘Fallacies’ http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/03/01/sheriff-debunks-fallacies-surrounding-gun-magazines-in-this-viral-vid-plus-his-response-to-bidens-shotgun-advice/