FLYJACK

See, if you challenge or are critical, he blames the messenger not the message.. It is somehow my fault Vordahl has unique profile that no witness would have missed. I went through the same thing with Ulis and his Sheridan narrative, when I challenged it with evidence he called me a troll so that he could ignore me and avoid criticism. Olemisscub admitted he can't make sense of those particles in the McCrone spreadsheet. These guys will keep going on Vordahl no matter what and fizzle out just like Ulis and Sheridan.. unfortunately we have to endure it until that happens.

He has me on "ignore" to avoid criticism.. and it prevents him from resorting to personal attacks..

An assumption.. not a fact. This is the same thing Ulis did and it afflicts many people with suspects,, You build a house of cards based on assumptions and conjecture while ignoring contradictory facts. They conflate a hypothesis with fact... with a bias,, cherry picking random pieces to form a confirmational narrative.. It is human nature.

0.00001 % The patent connection is way overplayed, that said I would have pursued it just to check,, but there is nothing there. If that profile image is accurate that eliminates him right there..

One of these particles is not like the others.. The other two are close but don't match perfectly.. They don't even match the patent exclusively.

Carl isn't reliable. Carl said he lost contact with Reca/Peca for that time period. His info is either from Reca/Peca and made up or Carl made it up. You have lots of claims but no evidence. So, Reca/Peca left Mi when,, in 1965? right after the robbery or when? later?, and he left his wife and kid in Mi to flee to Wa.. when did he eventually return to Mi? What abut his wife and kid in Mi, did they re-unite? if so, when? What years was Reca/Peca in Wa after leaving his family in Mi? and you still have presented no evidence he knew of Cossey, knew Cossey personally or colluded with Cossey about the chutes despite claiming it over and over. These aren't difficult questions.

Your inability to answer is telling.. Again, what date did Reca leave his family in Mi and move to Wa,, and when did he move back. and other than the unreliable tapes what evidence do you have that Reca/Peca knew of Cossey, knew him personally or colluded with him with the chutes.

The bomb could have been any type of pyro.. not limited to flares. I have seen vintage road flares about 8" long.. but there are many types of flares.

This is where Gryder mistakenly got the chute modification was moving the handle from left to right.. Cossey never said that, he said the pull was modified to out and up. Further, Cossey was describing his own chute not Hayden's chute the one Cooper used.

I have done research that is why I am asking you, you have no problem spoon feeding the forum endless Reca/Peca nonsense. I am just asking for some facts this time. Your inability to answer is telling.. Again, what date did Reca leave his family in Mi and move to Wa,, and when did he move back. and other than the unreliable tapes what evidence do you have that Reca/Peca knew of Cossey, knew him personally or colluded with him with the chutes. Simple..

Nonsense.. there is nothing in that patent that indicates these particles (if alloys) are exclusive.. There was lots of high tech stuff going on in the 60's, industrial, military, electronics, NASA and weapons.. The patent does not prove exclusivity. That is a fallacy.

Six to eight inches.. size could be a flare, dynamite, a firework or ??

Report on the state of Titanium circa 1966... it wasn't that rare.. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/AD0801280.pdf Even the Boeing 727 used 650lb of Titanium...

At best, it may tell us something about a few of the particles.. that is my point. It is very limiting.. you think you can control for 500,000 particles.. most unidentified.

We disagree on the degree if usefulness in this case.. The particles are not like DNA.. which has one source,, the particle combinations and sources are virtually limitless and unknown. Controls are only as good as your ability to think them up.. There is no way to create adequate controls for over 100,000 identified and probably another 400,000 more unidentified particles deposited on a tie in the 60's over a 7 year period.. the controls you can come up with are extremely limiting and inconclusive. You keep repeating we need controls which is true,, but in this case it is not practical and has limited effect. Controls are effective when you know all the variables.. The biggest clue from this tie is the wide variety of particles.. it was not from a single environment.

How do you know, you can't.. controls are an assumption based on knowns. Controls here are very limiting.. there are too many combinations and potential sources.. You just can't create controls for a particle in the mid 60's.. you don't know what you don't know. This is the logical flaw Ulis has.. he claims he searched and the patent was the only source for those 3 particles.. His "control" is flawed because he assumes he has all the information needed, of course he doesn't. In regards to the tie particles in the 60's controls become subjective limited to assumptions.. they are not certain. Sure, desiring controls is ideal, but it just isn't practical in this case.

So far, I haven't found it as an ingredient for matches, Tom tested a period lighter and it was negative.. Controls are ideal but not practical.. there are over 100,000 particles on the stubs and those stubs don't even cover the entire tie,,, there may be 500,000 particles on the tie.. The particles and combinations are beyond any ability to implement controls.. far too many variables

I found lots of 95% Al, 5% Mg particles on the tie, this is called Magnalium and it comes in different ratio's but this ratio is softer and in powder form is primarily used in pyrotechnics, explosives, flares, rocket fuel.. In ratio's of more MG it is used to form airplane and auto parts. More Mg makes it more brittle. All these particles (this pic a sample, not all) indicate powder form exposure.. It may be from the "bomb".. flares or a firework.. Earlier, I had posted a match for many of the particles, a hand held sparkler.. It produces bright yellow white sparks. So, pyrotechnics is a big use, commercial, military or retail,, but I am looking for other uses..

Ulis has lost it as well.. he says he is applying science then builds an argument of conjecture and assumptions.. Gryder has just proved he is a fraud with that fake Cooper chute container.. The Reca/Peca narrative is completely ridiculous.. they don't even try to fit the evidence, make sense or be rational. It is a Vortex induced mass formation psychosis..

You still won't answer some of your claims.. that seems key to deception. Other than the unreliable tapes, what proof do you have that Reca/Peca either knew of Cossey, knew him personally or colluded with him. and when did Reca/Peca leave his family and go to Wa and when did he return to Mi.

Don't worry Slim,, it is not Cooper's container.. Gryder needed a slam dunk piece of evidence and he somehow found a container.. wherever he got it, it isn't the one Cooper used.. it doesn't match Hayden's and it doesn't match Cossey's false claim that it was his personal chute. I suspect Gryder may have planted it.. regardless, he got it wrong. Gryder pulling this nonsense really undermines the Cooper case in the minds of the public..

It can be rejected, but the only way to positively ID is if the canopy has the S/N 60-9707 Gryder's claim that the chute container was Cossey's and Cooper's is a mess.. I am beginning to believe he is scamming.. The chute container Gryder found has D-rings.. Hayden's did not. Cossey was mistaken, his personal custom chute wasn't used. You don't supply one custom chute and regular chute as a set of bailout rigs... Further, Cossey's pull customization claim was not moving handle left to right. It was out and up. Cossey claimed the chute was sage green nylon container/sage green nylon straps.. Cossey also claimed his chute did not have D-rings.. Those stitches look new.. So, the chute container Gryder claims he found doesn't match Hayden's container and it doesn't match Cossey's false claim. This is the container Gryder claims he found... it has D rings..

McCoy demanded fuel truck 100 ft from the nose, left side 2 drivers. Cooper demands 10 or 11 o'clock.. 1 driver.. The chute Gryder claims he found looks like it has D rings.. BUSTED

Gryder... part 2 Claims he found Cooper's NB8.. He didn't. Cossey never claimed his mod was moving the ripcord left to right and Cossey got the chute wrong.. spends half the vid on the killing of McCoy No, McCoy was NOT Cooper

You SAID Reca/Peca colluded with Cossey, where is your proof.. When did Reca/Peca live in Wa.. apparently he fled Mi after a 1965 robbery leaving his family.