mrshutter45

I don't like to toss the word liar around like you do. I simply find it hard to believe this could be remembered in such detail without any reason for recalling it. no trauma or anything to trigger it. If someone like that was really sincere they would contact the FBI vs an author of a book and talking about a movie?

Robert, you keep saying the movie is coming and then say it might not. you just said weeks ago it was going to be made in 2021 for the anniversary. a couple pages back you make a claim it might or might not be made. you are all over the board with the movie structure. how could people get on board for something years from now. will that child actor be available forever? it's more excuses at every turn. can we chip in to get this thing going?

you have been complaining about that show since it came out and here for several pages? (History documentary)

I just don't believe someone can remember something so irrelevant almost 50 years ago. I don't care what she is saying. we were run out of rooms constantly growing up. typically, you need reason for recall, especially that long ago. I have a very good memory. I use to work with my grandfather on televisions but couldn't tell you what brand one was on any given day. reluctant to be on camera could mean many things...the bomb has been well documented.

My complaints will be here and on my forum. shouldn't you be sending complaints to the production company Colbert worked with? more of that double standard thingy?

Don't try an pull the Marla Cooper story of not owning a television set to imply any funny stuff taking place. Marla stated in a interview that she didn't even own a TV when asked about things...

I'm talking about the notebook or notes from the sheriff. I should of said notes.

The stews are the only ones who seen it...didn't your witness "only get a quick glance" stews knew what they were looking at. That is not the correct description given by the witnesses. that whole book is full of error's. has people believing the planes flew at 7,000 feet as well. that was only at the start of the flight. Bernie Madoff was convincing too....

Robert, ....two rolls taped together is very small and not convincing in the least. put that in a briefcase and you will see. it's only five and a half inches long. it's not the point of being real it's the point of making it look real. you are constructing a firecracker lol. The color was stated the same as the uniforms. that's red. you are correct that most dynamite is brown. people believe more towards red from cartoons. fake or not it worked. Yes, I used R99's quote. I don't agree with his conclusions but one never knows. he's a pilot, skydiver and a aeronautical engineer to boot.

dynamite is 8 inches long. they said approx. 6 to 8 inches long and 8 sticks. quarters are two and three quarter of an inch long. three rolls would be needed times eight sticks. I think I calculated four per stick so I was off a little. that's still $1,525.01 in 1971. two rolls of quarters are five and a half inches. very short and not very convincing.. Robert, many people act sincere but are not..the whole thing doesn't pass the smell test as R99 always puts it..

That story is pure BS. as kids we were all ran out of rooms often. I can't recall where or when. the memory of this witness is astounding. she recalls something that really had no reason to recall and yet has perfect detailed memory. especially a memory involving seconds from decades past. making a bomb out of rolls of quarters is "ridiculous" as you like to say. rather expensive for a poor guy. it's over 2 grand to make that bomb lol. it would be flimsy, heavy and hard to keep it's shape and require a lot of tape that would of been noticed. much simpler ways to be creative if it was even fake to begin with. wood dowels, flares etc.

Just more distraction from Robert....Of course Tom wasn't pleased but it hardly makes him slanted.

ridiculous and slanted are two different words..not many believe Rackstraw was Cooper. only you believe just about everything is slanted...

Good points Mark but remember they raided there office because they are slanted

I didn't waste anything but time telling you about being wrong. I don't care what you do with the book. I told you what the right thing to do with the book. follow? the same will be told next year and the year after. you have been told since I've been involved in the case. way before the 54 page report. we had the same problem getting you to remove the inaccurate material off of other sites, newsvine was one...your website for another example.. My site has nothing to do with your book. just more distraction from the point..

I don't really care what you do with the book. I'm telling you what is right and wrong...do it in 10 years....makes no difference to me...

more excuses Robert, you claim to want to dump thousands on a party and then whine about a couple hundred.

You send the PM's and not me.....I responded to them. I just got tired of the broken record. you skew off topic even offline. the recent one was about the placard and you went off topic as usual. lets get that straight. you are making it out like I contacted you...it's more like you are the one interested in what I have to say or you wouldn't contact me in the first place

That's no excuse for an author to knowingly allow error's to be in a book for years. this is damage to your credibility. it doesn't matter what you did outside of the book. it's the book with the error's. waiting for a movie is no excuse either. So, I can say you rob banks on my forum and leave it there and post somewhere else you didn't? not everyone follows what happens after a book is published. not every person writes a review either. it's wrong anyway you look at it..you willingly allow false information to continue. You revise the same edition. you don't have to add anything. you fix what's broken or remove it...

You should of fixed them years ago...self admitted and complain about others?

He can't even leave when he says he's taking a break...usually, about 12-24 hours max..

Robert, isn't your movie about your book. one that's full of error's? you have already said you are in this for the money, so how are you any different?

The actual witnesses will have trouble remembering 40 years back. most people with suspects have perfect memory, detailed like yesterday I do believe if a picture of Cooper was shown it would trigger there memory...

Yes, I believe him. not everyone is a liar. what purpose does he have with his answer of not knowing. was he was lying and she did look at the photo's. which way you want this? You made a joke that backfired on you. it was pure malice in it's intent. I see we are now back to discussing other forums and people once again due to your comments... I heard minimum of three alerts. I even replied twice that you were blocked and still got alerts. First response of block.. "Sorry, but I put you on ignore in my PM's today after I posted. you are a broken record and I've grown tired of it. " Second response "sorry, all I see is the notification. I don't know why you keep posting a PM...." more notifications followed...

I asked Tom Colbert who was the exc-producer if pictures were shown to Tina. he replied that he didn't know. if anyone knew it would of been him. he was about as involved as one could get. it really doesn't matter because Tina would of watched the show. who wouldn't watch a program they were involved in or about a case they were involved in.