mrshutter45

Only you are getting ahead of themselves...

That's correct. the problem is you FAIL to follow the rules to begin with!!! AGAIN, a reminder that posts which are not related directly to the case will be removed. This isn't a place to go back and forth about personal details about personal beef or disagreements ?

Let me try again....this will not happen with you involved. it's going to start more problems vs help. it doesn't belong on here until it becomes reality.

"AGAIN, a reminder that posts which are not related directly to the case will be removed." How about announcing it when it happens a year from now?

None of this belongs on here either...

I think you should stick to camping. Bryan sends us emails often. the last one ended dated November 12, 2019 as follows... "Have a good day gentlemen. Bryan P.S. Not responding to Blevin's emails"

I suggest looking under camping or hiking forums/threads to get the best results in the Seattle area for next years event?

try following a policy? The last time I checked everyone does work together. however, there is one who doesn't get to work with others so he lashes out constantly trying to blame the world for HIS mistakes. If you look at the list of people Eric has for the conference it tells you the grade performance is hardly what that ONE person states. it's FULL. if 10 people show or 200 you will see that Eric succeeded and wasn't all talk or begging anyone. no deadline required. the "other" person will say he doesn't need anyone in Cooperland" and then ask for help, complete with a deadline. that's why he isn't asking on other sites. just here....he will never change....sad.

lol people are scared to ask about the forum, okay...you keep saying it doesn't bother you and yet here we are talking about my forum and breaking the rules because you can't keep your nose out of peoples business. This thread will NEVER function with you on the board gossiping like an old lady with nothing better to do... I also find it interesting all the "support" you get when you go camping and yet no pictures are shown. they email almost immediately after you announce it and yet we have crickets with the party. where is your public? should be a simple task with your following? we have been waiting years for that big show that blows all the other events away. better get going....

He's more upset than anyone because he can't see what's going on. that's the core of the problem right there

Robert, it's none of your business....I would be worried about all the false information flying around you have, that's what's damaging. you even sell bad information. I don't think you are in the position to tell people what is right or wrong... You don't like it, tough...been telling you that for years.

Thank god you don't own places like Quora. you would shut it down every other week completely. if you are to lazy to join then you really don't want to know. could you imagine places like Facebook doing something like that. the number one social media site shutting the whole world out? the only person I've had whining about it has a book full of self admitted false information. no login required but he does charge you for the inaccurate information. (insert whiny voice) I have to pay this and pay that to fix it. he won't pay it but he will take it

sounds like you should of posted it all over a while back when you first spoke of it. why only here.

support from who?

Also, you never answered who you are looking for to support your party. I thought you knew the public personally?

You answered the question perfectly. it's okay for you to go after other suspects "busy for days" looking for things to discredit them with and make fun of them. the heat turns your way and you get defensive and act like it's only you that gets sourced out. I don't need to look over anything Darren has on his site. I'm looking at what you have on yours, follow? I don't see any indications for me to ask Darren anything. Darren is not making any claims about anything, apples and oranges, as you say! Marla made claims and you went after her. Colbert makes claims and you went after him. Reca and others as well BUT don't do this to Robert Blevins? You have a book with error's and feel no need to correct them until 2030, 40 etc. the 54 page PDF has error's but another site sums parts of it up like bread crumbs on the internet to follow the truth lol. being excluded from my forum or Bruce's has zero impact on what you write surrounding Kenny? it's so much easier to say, you know what. I'm going to fix these problems. instead you feel above everyone and don't feel it's a valid point. lets not forget you wrote all over the place Kenny bought his lot for 10 bucks but you never said that lol.

Robert, this is no different than what you do to other suspects. except, you make articles about them, cartoons etc..I'm right here explaining the problems. I research the case. I research suspects and other things related to Cooper. that's what we all do? you seem to want to be excluded from this? or make it appear we are picking on you. it's been a problem since around 2013 when you insisted people verify things... Yes, it makes it harder when you have the misinformation out there and can't change portions of it due to being on sites by others. you have to start somewhere. the site you own is a good start. I had half of Colberts team on my forum during the show and a lot of heat came off that thread. I don't think any of them returned.

It's right here...if it's outdated then remove it...one is your site! https://www.adventurebooksofseattle.com/FinalReportChristiansen2015.pdf and here? http://www.americas-most-haunted.com/2018/03/22/has-the-d-b-cooper-case-finally-been-solved-talking-with-authorresearcher-robert-blevins-on-after-hours-amthe-criminal-code/

Robert, you claimed it here recently, one page back. it's in the 54 page report multiple times accessible online. I don't need an updated story about inaccurate info corrected elsewhere. you have error's all over the place. the book, sites, PDF's etc. Farflungs post was showing you have said this for years.

here you say it again and I have one of Farflungs creative Jpegs of you stating the house was paid in cash and the lot sold for 10 bucks...this was way back in 2014....

"I asked him how Christiansen, who made no more than $512 before taxes in a good month, could qualify to buy the house and an adjoining lot in 1972 for a total of ten dollars" Further down the document: "He also paid ten dollars to the Grimes couple for a lot adjoining the house." Really?

Robert, you have made that claim for years. are you really going to say you didn't?

that's exactly what the document is for. so you don't know how much someone paid for the property. it's none of your business unless you want to purchase it when it's for sale. the ten bucks mean squat nor does it imply it was sold for ten bucks as you have claimed since you read the document..the rest of the reasoning was explained multiple times.. Hello, anybody in there

The ability to make a post about Kenny purchasing a house for cash while including a mortgage is clear enough you haven't a clue what you are talking about. then posting the document of consideration during the sametime for 10 dollars is astoundingly clear. you continue to stick to the ten dollars. you just don't understand and I'm tired of showing the obvious as others pointed out. this is scary..

I don't know if you are Robert Blevins or a woman from Kansas? I can assume he paid $75 dollars or $200. you are trying to play off the fact of misunderstanding the document..