Missing AM tower, anyone?

[Colm 1]

Alright, which one of you degenerates is responsible for this?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2024/02/09/alabama-radio-station-tower-missing/

 

[kleggo 138]

useless since paywall.

but thanks anyway

[pchapman 261]

15 minutes ago, kleggo said:

useless since paywall.

but thanks anyway

A tip -- If you can turn off Javascript and refresh, most WaPo articles can be viewed. (Depending on the browser & operating system, that can be very longwinded to do, or easy to do with some browser extension.)

[JoeWeber 2,299]

8 hours ago, pchapman said:

A tip -- If you can turn off Javascript and refresh, most WaPo articles can be viewed. (Depending on the browser & operating system, that can be very longwinded to do, or easy to do with some browser extension.)

Absolutely. Of course the option of actually paying for desired content is always an option.

[gowlerk 1,912]

27 minutes ago, JoeWeber said:

Absolutely. Of course the option of actually paying for desired content is always an option.

Not really much of an option unless you are willing to subscribe. And I can't justify subscribing to every publication that people link to. There is no a la carte option.

[JoeWeber 2,299]

1 minute ago, gowlerk said:

Not really much of an option unless you are willing to subscribe. And I can't justify subscribing to every publication that people link to. There is no a la carte option.

Education is something worth paying for, if you've a mind. One big reason for the dearth of objective reporting is the lack of revenue received by the news agencies. But you know that. Disabling Javascript is a neat workaround that will also come to a screeching halt someday leaving you with what?

"Don't it always seem to go
That you don't know what you got 'til it's gone?"

[sfzombie13 307]

8 hours ago, JoeWeber said:

One big reason for the dearth of objective reporting is the lack of revenue received by the news agencies

yeah, that's the reason.